Ooops, maybe no F1 GP race this weekend?????
Only just seen this on the AOL sport pages:
Minardi team boss Paul Stoddart claims Formula One teams will boycott this weekend's season-opening Australian Grand Prix unless Ferrari back down over their refusal to allow his team to use last season's car.
Financial constraints mean Minardi have not been able to make the necessary re-design to comply with new regulations on aerodynamics and they approached fellow competitors to seek approval to use last season's model. Only Ferrari have refused to consent and Stoddart will make one last plea to try to ensure Minardi's participation in their home grand prix.
However, he said if his bid was unsuccessful there was a threat to Sunday's race in Melbourne, commenting: "Put it this way, if Minardi's wheels do not turn this weekend they will not be the only ones."
"The Group of Nine (made up of all F1 teams bar Ferrari) is pretty strong and there is an agreement between everyone except Ferrari.
"I would hope Jean Todt sees sense but who knows? Ferrari have acted unilaterally outside of all the other teams in recent weeks.
"As a last resort, and I mean last resort, there is always the option of the High Court to challenge the legality of the regulations.
"But on this, the 10th anniversary of the Melbourne Grand Prix, I would not want to be the one to spoil the party," he added.
Minardi team boss Paul Stoddart claims Formula One teams will boycott this weekend's season-opening Australian Grand Prix unless Ferrari back down over their refusal to allow his team to use last season's car.
Financial constraints mean Minardi have not been able to make the necessary re-design to comply with new regulations on aerodynamics and they approached fellow competitors to seek approval to use last season's model. Only Ferrari have refused to consent and Stoddart will make one last plea to try to ensure Minardi's participation in their home grand prix.
However, he said if his bid was unsuccessful there was a threat to Sunday's race in Melbourne, commenting: "Put it this way, if Minardi's wheels do not turn this weekend they will not be the only ones."
"The Group of Nine (made up of all F1 teams bar Ferrari) is pretty strong and there is an agreement between everyone except Ferrari.
"I would hope Jean Todt sees sense but who knows? Ferrari have acted unilaterally outside of all the other teams in recent weeks.
"As a last resort, and I mean last resort, there is always the option of the High Court to challenge the legality of the regulations.
"But on this, the 10th anniversary of the Melbourne Grand Prix, I would not want to be the one to spoil the party," he added.
the divide between ferrari and the rest is getting even bigger. their domination at the top wont last forever and wouldnt like to be them when it all goes wrong. think they have to learn to win and lose gratefully!!
twocers!
twocers!
Originally Posted by MadMac
Ferrari
Good on the other teams backing minardi up

OK, if all the other teams refuse to race on Sunday, then Ferrari only have to get their two cars on to the grid, complete the race distance and get maximum points......The result would have to stand ??? As Ferrari would not have broken any rules/regs........
Trending Topics
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,428
Likes: 4
From: Wiltshire, Bath, chippenham area!
they could just park their cars blocking the track and pitlane!
Ferrari would be a bit fooked then!
Hope the race goes ahead, its not like minardi are a top running team anyway.
so why should it bother Ferrari so much.
Ferrari would be a bit fooked then!
Hope the race goes ahead, its not like minardi are a top running team anyway.
so why should it bother Ferrari so much.
Originally Posted by Doug Stirling
Jean Todt is complete arse
TO be honest i wish they wouldnt keep changing the rules in F1. becuase of this i am losing interest!!! and now im not bothered if i dont see any races. imo let F1 progress by its self and Ferrari will soon be nock of the top
TO be honest i wish they wouldnt keep changing the rules in F1. becuase of this i am losing interest!!! and now im not bothered if i dont see any races. imo let F1 progress by its self and Ferrari will soon be nock of the top
I'm hoping to have Sky Plus by the time the next season to record it, is on so I can watch most of it in FF and only watch it for the interesting parts... ie when shumi crashes... pause, repeat A, repeat B and watch over and over again
I so wish they would just intorduce sucsess balast to the cars. I think that would even it up a bit.
I so wish they would just intorduce sucsess balast to the cars. I think that would even it up a bit.
Red Bull are also protesting against Minardi so it looks as though Minardi are fooked. they can either make the last minute aerodynamic alterations, which would at least allow them to make the grid or to withdraw untill the new car is built.
I sympathise with minardi BUT rules are rules... no one would let ferrari race if they said 'sorry the alterations we need to make dont fall within our budget, but can we race anyway'
rules are rules
It's now got to the point where rule changes are being introduced that limit the amount of money the big teams can spend (tyres/engine) to try and make F1 more accessible to the likes of Minardi... this is just going to hold back the development of the cars.
If the big teams are prepared to spend huge sums of money to advance technology then surely they should be encouraged to do so - not held back.
I say remove all the 'spend-less' rules and let Ferrari and the other big teams continue to spend their huge budgets. Let them go back to using turbos too... then we'll be able to gain from the advancements...
Seems people just want to see him crash or Ferrari in general to fail.
Do you remember 10 years ago how bad Ferrari were? They rarely finished a race!!
Mclaren had their day in the 80s, do you forget that as well!!
I love watching f1 and motor sport in general and love watching Schumacher and have huge respect for how he can drive and the brilliant team he drives for!!
I dont think the other teams are that far behind in terms of technology so maybe if Schumacher drops his level a bit this season then it be a close one!
About these rules, I feel sorry for minardi but as says above rules are rules and im sure the new red bull team had it very hard this year as well but they have managed to get a car out and you never know it may be competitive.
Cant wait for the season to start.
Do you remember 10 years ago how bad Ferrari were? They rarely finished a race!!
Mclaren had their day in the 80s, do you forget that as well!!
I love watching f1 and motor sport in general and love watching Schumacher and have huge respect for how he can drive and the brilliant team he drives for!!
I dont think the other teams are that far behind in terms of technology so maybe if Schumacher drops his level a bit this season then it be a close one!
About these rules, I feel sorry for minardi but as says above rules are rules and im sure the new red bull team had it very hard this year as well but they have managed to get a car out and you never know it may be competitive.
Cant wait for the season to start.
all I know is they have been mega busy building the new car, I have no idea on development off the top of my head
but It doesnt change what I said , the rules are changed for everyone
but It doesnt change what I said , the rules are changed for everyone
Originally Posted by Dave^
nah - just get rid of all the electronics......Shuey'd soon be struggling......

Alonso might though!
As for Minardi. Tough Shit.
Say Arsenal play some amateur team in a football match. Will Arsenal only be allowed 5 players whilst the other team can have 50?
Theres a reason Minardi are rubbish. Lack of sponsorship hence lack of money. They have ALWAYS unperformed. And they've been going donkeys years. (1985 was the teams first F1 race) Longer than Jordan, who, for their sins have won a few races since he started out in F1 in 1991.
I dont care if Minardi go out of business to be honest. (Feel for the workers admittedly) Tell me what they add to the "show" Tell me why they need to be there if they cant afford to be?
This isnt a charity, this is a big business based on being the fastest within the given rules.
Going to have to disagree with you here on the Minardi deal....
If you look at performance/money, Minardi are the hands-down winners.
They get 95% of the performance for about 20% of the money compared to the top teams.
I don't really care for the politics in F1 and it has gotten a bit boring with all the stupid rule changes (all the way back to when Max thought it was a brilliant idea to use grooved tires) but this latest round shows how complete an idiot Max is.
All the rule changes/mods are being forced in the name of 'safety' and to 'slow the cars down' but how safe is using one set of tires per DAY on each race weekend.
The guy says SAFETY out of his mouth and then pulls the new rules out of his ASS
If you look at performance/money, Minardi are the hands-down winners.
They get 95% of the performance for about 20% of the money compared to the top teams.
I don't really care for the politics in F1 and it has gotten a bit boring with all the stupid rule changes (all the way back to when Max thought it was a brilliant idea to use grooved tires) but this latest round shows how complete an idiot Max is.
All the rule changes/mods are being forced in the name of 'safety' and to 'slow the cars down' but how safe is using one set of tires per DAY on each race weekend.
The guy says SAFETY out of his mouth and then pulls the new rules out of his ASS
shame that really coz even tho they have a small budget they keep on racing and every now and then the do get in the points, trust ferrari to bloody object when the rest of the teams see no problem with it
I think it just ferrari being a bit childish, apparently minardi have had a few things to say about ferrari over the winter so they are doing it just out of spite. If the other teams (maybe except red bull) can agree to it then ferrari shouldn't object as they are least likely to be challenged by them (jordan obviously have no problem and the minardis could beat them if last year is anything to go by), if anything it could benefit them as they (ferrari) wouldn't have to lap them as many times if their car (minardi) was a little bit quicker
As we seem to be making comparisons to football then think of it this way, chelsea with 10 men would still beat a team in a lower division with 11 men, they could probably do it with 9!!!!
Anyway if we lose another team then we'll be down to nine and 18 cars and we dont want that, i remember the days when they had between 30 and 40 cars trying to get onto a grid of 26 and pre-qualifying had to take place before the proper qualifying could happen.
Anyway looking forward to sunday and MS getting beaten by McLaren and Renault
As we seem to be making comparisons to football then think of it this way, chelsea with 10 men would still beat a team in a lower division with 11 men, they could probably do it with 9!!!!
Anyway if we lose another team then we'll be down to nine and 18 cars and we dont want that, i remember the days when they had between 30 and 40 cars trying to get onto a grid of 26 and pre-qualifying had to take place before the proper qualifying could happen.
Anyway looking forward to sunday and MS getting beaten by McLaren and Renault
Originally Posted by EscortWRC
They get 95% of the performance for about 20% of the money compared to the top teams.
Its unfair to penalise a team because they havent got the money to do it. Its not like they are going to get an advantage over the other teams is it
I'd have to agree with Stoddart (like it matters....) on the new rules being implemented unilaterally as being 'illegal' based on the concorde agreement. Therefore, the 2004 spec cars should be deemed legal in 2005.
The FIA claims that the new rules are in the interest of 'safety' yet require only one set of tires PER DAY......the word 'oxymoron' comes to mind here.
Yet again, Max tries to kill his own cash cow......IDIOT
Bring back slicks
Bring back turbos
Bring back active suspension
The FIA claims that the new rules are in the interest of 'safety' yet require only one set of tires PER DAY......the word 'oxymoron' comes to mind here.
Yet again, Max tries to kill his own cash cow......IDIOT
Bring back slicks
Bring back turbos
Bring back active suspension
nah - just get rid of all the electronics......Shuey'd soon be struggling......
PMSL at that quote
Schuey was around way before electronics took over in f1, if they where to be banned schuey would benefit the most
PMSL at that quote
Schuey was around way before electronics took over in f1, if they where to be banned schuey would benefit the most
Originally Posted by MadMac
Its unfair to penalise a team because they havent got the money to do it. Its not like they are going to get an advantage over the other teams is it 
Ah ha. But you see the new 05 rules were desgined to reduce aerodynamic efficiency. Raise the front wing 50mm and bring the rear wing foward, this was to cut overall by around 25%. Same as the one set of tyres per race rule. Reduce mechanical grip towards the end of the event.
Now most of the bigger teams have clawed back nearly all of that in their designs for this year. However the mid field teams wont have. As Horner (RBR) said what happens when Minardi out score his team with a car thats not subject to the same rules?
Each point is worth $Xm dollars next year so what happens when Minardi get more money next year than say Midland or RBR. Will those 2 teams be allowed to run 05 cars in 06?
Makes even more of a mockery of the sport because its very obviously unfair.
Im no fan of Stoddart, he seems to have a big book titled "Why my team is shite and always will be" instead of another called "Raising your Game : How to succeed in F1"
Minardi has '05 aero parts on hand, but they have not been tested so they're not sure what they have.
The rule changes were forced down the teams throats very late, so it stands to reason with long lead time items that some changes would not be possible to make the schedule for teams with less resources.
I think Todt is scared that they are not going to be dominant this year and is afraid of even Minardi for some reason. I hope McLaren, BAR, and Renault hand them their lunch. I like Rubens, but the rest of the Ferrari gang is a bunch of arrogant pricks.
The rule changes were forced down the teams throats very late, so it stands to reason with long lead time items that some changes would not be possible to make the schedule for teams with less resources.
I think Todt is scared that they are not going to be dominant this year and is afraid of even Minardi for some reason. I hope McLaren, BAR, and Renault hand them their lunch. I like Rubens, but the rest of the Ferrari gang is a bunch of arrogant pricks.



