Adjustable cam pulley - any benefit?
S2 been of the road for a while.
Needs m.o.t'd & then set up. I picked up a piper adjustable cam pulley.
Is there any point in installing this?
Engine is standard 1600, balanced,stage 2 head,piper 285t2.
chipped ecu, pace chargecooler,Standard T3,uprated actuator running 15psi.
If it's worthwhile I'd rather install it before spending £150 getting
the car set up.
Needs m.o.t'd & then set up. I picked up a piper adjustable cam pulley.
Is there any point in installing this?
Engine is standard 1600, balanced,stage 2 head,piper 285t2.
chipped ecu, pace chargecooler,Standard T3,uprated actuator running 15psi.
If it's worthwhile I'd rather install it before spending £150 getting
the car set up.
Without one nothing can be done!
lol
Trending Topics
I dont agree Perry, when on a dyno you can adjust it to get the most out of your engine, or move the power band to where you would like it, if running a big turbo for example you might advance it a little to decrease spool up time.
Without one nothing can be done!
Totally untrue!!
lol
Without one nothing can be done!
Totally untrue!!
lolA good starting point is the cam manufacturer opening and closing events in any case.
Karlos always disagrees with me!
maybe because I am not English
Cheers
But in this case, as he is going for a dyno session and has a 285T2 he could benefit from a vernier... Although with only running a stock T3 both the cam and vernier are a little pointless IMO.
Bodybuilding
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
From: Cannot be identified by the information given.
karlos is a little like chip, if he knows better from experience then he will argue his case, so people who might be reading dont get the wrong info
Last edited by G2RSR; Apr 16, 2012 at 09:41 PM.
I think unless you are going to play with the advance/retard on a dyno then there's not a lot of point, you can set it up to where it 'should' be but i've found that even then they are never in the 'right' position for optimum performance.
Occasionally, you get a camshaft that's in the right place to start with even using a standard pulley, so therefore a vernier is not needed, but you don't know until you fit one and advance/retard and power run it on the dyno.
Karlos, I wouldn't say a cam and a vernier are pointless on a standard T3 rs turbo, sometimes they need a higher rev limit but there's still definately gaines to be had! you don't need boost for a higher peak power.
Camshafts shift peak power higher up in the rev range, revs = bhp.
Occasionally, you get a camshaft that's in the right place to start with even using a standard pulley, so therefore a vernier is not needed, but you don't know until you fit one and advance/retard and power run it on the dyno.
Karlos, I wouldn't say a cam and a vernier are pointless on a standard T3 rs turbo, sometimes they need a higher rev limit but there's still definately gaines to be had! you don't need boost for a higher peak power.
Camshafts shift peak power higher up in the rev range, revs = bhp.
Last edited by vroooom ptssssh; Apr 16, 2012 at 08:20 PM.
Karlos, I wouldn't say a cam and a vernier are pointless on a standard T3 rs turbo, sometimes they need a higher rev limit but there's still definately gaines to be had! you don't need boost for a higher peak power.
Camshafts shift peak power higher up in the rev range, revs = bhp.
Camshafts shift peak power higher up in the rev range, revs = bhp.
A stock cam is actually quite a balanced profile and fine for anything up to and around 250bhp.
But back to the original question... As he has it he might as well fit it as it costs nothing.
Just my thoughts anyway fella's!
Last edited by Karlos G; Apr 16, 2012 at 09:22 PM.
Thanks for the replies.
Bit dubious myself about the 285t2 on my engine but it was installed ten years ago and never driven the car since.
I actually have a stage 3 big valve head which has a power engineering cam
(sx 428 maybe) which would probably suit the car better if I could be arsed swapping it but will probably just keep it for a new engine I'm building.
Bit dubious myself about the 285t2 on my engine but it was installed ten years ago and never driven the car since.
I actually have a stage 3 big valve head which has a power engineering cam
(sx 428 maybe) which would probably suit the car better if I could be arsed swapping it but will probably just keep it for a new engine I'm building.
so with adjustable cam pulley and newmans cam if you retard you get less turbo lag and if you advance your turbo kicks in at higher rpm is this right????? or am i missing something?
Sorry to throw this up again
I got a burton pulley today off an eBay seller. My plan is to keep the cam standard unless its found to be knackered or can pick up a after market one cheap.
Is their any point installing it. For the moment she will be standard , I have a pace i/c, magnex exhaust and it will hàve a k & n panel. I will probably get a chip in it too
Cheers
I got a burton pulley today off an eBay seller. My plan is to keep the cam standard unless its found to be knackered or can pick up a after market one cheap.
Is their any point installing it. For the moment she will be standard , I have a pace i/c, magnex exhaust and it will hàve a k & n panel. I will probably get a chip in it too
Cheers
Sorry to throw this up again
I got a burton pulley today off an eBay seller. My plan is to keep the cam standard unless its found to be knackered or can pick up a after market one cheap.
Is their any point installing it. For the moment she will be standard , I have a pace i/c, magnex exhaust and it will hàve a k & n panel. I will probably get a chip in it too
Cheers
I got a burton pulley today off an eBay seller. My plan is to keep the cam standard unless its found to be knackered or can pick up a after market one cheap.
Is their any point installing it. For the moment she will be standard , I have a pace i/c, magnex exhaust and it will hàve a k & n panel. I will probably get a chip in it too
Cheers
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






