Todays RR Graph
Todays RR Graph
Heres todays graph for you all to take the P out of lol
At least we can read it now thanks to my Brother
Graph from PE last year
Steve
At least we can read it now thanks to my Brother
Graph from PE last year
Steve
Last edited by cossie4i+; Apr 1, 2012 at 08:57 PM.
Trending Topics
Regular Contributor
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: magor, south wales
i love the RR result threads.... because the figure is lower or higher than you expected does that make the car bad or great???
i ve learnt to ignore the figures mainly a willy waving comp and judge a car on how it performs on the road.
either way thats ALOT of power in a rwd sierra.
i ve learnt to ignore the figures mainly a willy waving comp and judge a car on how it performs on the road.
either way thats ALOT of power in a rwd sierra.
i love the RR result threads.... because the figure is lower or higher than you expected does that make the car bad or great???
i ve learnt to ignore the figures mainly a willy waving comp and judge a car on how it performs on the road.
either way thats ALOT of power in a rwd sierra.
i ve learnt to ignore the figures mainly a willy waving comp and judge a car on how it performs on the road.
either way thats ALOT of power in a rwd sierra.
Steve
Regular Contributor
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: magor, south wales
is the power figure that important?? if so get the op to put the ambient air temp sensor into a cup of tea.
imo unless the same rollers arfe used to gauge what difference new mods haved made you'll always get different results, with different operators, rollers etc etc
get to brunters and do a 0-100 or 30-130 or top speedn you'll soon know where the car is power wise.
love it though
imo unless the same rollers arfe used to gauge what difference new mods haved made you'll always get different results, with different operators, rollers etc etc
get to brunters and do a 0-100 or 30-130 or top speedn you'll soon know where the car is power wise.
love it though
Happily retired
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 238
From: Hampshire
i love the RR result threads.... because the figure is lower or higher than you expected does that make the car bad or great???
i ve learnt to ignore the figures mainly a willy waving comp and judge a car on how it performs on the road.
either way thats ALOT of power in a rwd sierra.
i ve learnt to ignore the figures mainly a willy waving comp and judge a car on how it performs on the road.
either way thats ALOT of power in a rwd sierra.
Steves figures are about right for the engine Spec the previous figures to coin Jimbo 'was bollix' & Steve knows that.
Really Rod im under the impression that torque figures are accurate but bhp is a simple untrustworthy calculation of torque ! the fact remains the car made more torque than last time at powers so its more powerful the end ! I agree the recent figures were a tad larger than life 
but cant take jimbo seriously tbh if its scs built or mapped it is correct if ita anyone else its bollocks reminds me of the old bruce reed day's ! got nothing o say and saying to loud
but cant take jimbo seriously tbh if its scs built or mapped it is correct if ita anyone else its bollocks reminds me of the old bruce reed day's ! got nothing o say and saying to loud
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 129
From: Lincs.
Last edited by GVK.; Apr 1, 2012 at 11:14 PM.
Its made on the rollers what the engine is capable of making. Steve you have a fast car but I wish you had gone the GT30 route like i had. With your flowed head and decent inlet you would have seen more if thats what you wanted.
Plus it scares you so all is good
Plus it scares you so all is good
Last edited by CossieRich; Apr 2, 2012 at 07:02 AM.
Really Rod im under the impression that torque figures are accurate but bhp is a simple untrustworthy calculation of torque ! the fact remains the car made more torque than last time at powers so its more powerful the end ! I agree the recent figures were a tad larger than life but cant take jimbo seriously tbh if its scs built or mapped it is correct if ita anyone else its bollocks reminds me of the old bruce reed day's ! got nothing o say and saying to loud
but cant take jimbo seriously tbh if its scs built or mapped it is correct if ita anyone else its bollocks reminds me of the old bruce reed day's ! got nothing o say and saying to loud 
Nice figures steve that's more like it
Really Rod im under the impression that torque figures are accurate but bhp is a simple untrustworthy calculation of torque ! the fact remains the car made more torque than last time at powers so its more powerful the end ! I agree the recent figures were a tad larger than life but cant take jimbo seriously tbh if its scs built or mapped it is correct if ita anyone else its bollocks reminds me of the old bruce reed day's ! got nothing o say and saying to loud
but cant take jimbo seriously tbh if its scs built or mapped it is correct if ita anyone else its bollocks reminds me of the old bruce reed day's ! got nothing o say and saying to loud Not strictly true. Jimbo didnt rubbish my figures.
He had the balls to say what a lot were thinking about making 545bhp on a T38 turbo. Way too high a figure.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rsguy
General Car Related Discussion.
44
Sep 29, 2015 03:29 PM