165bhp clio williams vs standard clio 200?
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,428
Likes: 4
From: Wiltshire, Bath, chippenham area!
tell you what.. them old williams' are a pretty impressive old school hot hatch!
can be pretty quick too! I'd say it would be closer between the two than you might initially think..
can be pretty quick too! I'd say it would be closer between the two than you might initially think..
Have a gander here. Evo recommend them very highly.
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evol..._williams.html
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evol..._williams.html
Trending Topics
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 2
From: Leicester
My brother in law had the 197 and out of the 172 & 182 it was the slowest due to the weight. It never felt that quick so i dont imagine the 200 feels very quick either.
When I had a williams 3 and a 182 cup at the same time the Williams was more fun, performance was similar between them, but being a 15 year old renault the williams felt a bit fragile. The new clio200 is heavier than the 182 cup so wouldnt be much quicker (if any), but its a much bigger car better daily driver.
My Williams had a lot done to it - chip, exhaust, induction kit, Ao48's, brakes shocks bushes had all been replaced etc so it was a really good example - a good Williams is a really quick little car, loads of grip, really goes well above 4,000 revs and the seats are nice low unlike the later cars where you feel like you are sitting on top of it rather than in it.
My Williams had a lot done to it - chip, exhaust, induction kit, Ao48's, brakes shocks bushes had all been replaced etc so it was a really good example - a good Williams is a really quick little car, loads of grip, really goes well above 4,000 revs and the seats are nice low unlike the later cars where you feel like you are sitting on top of it rather than in it.
Last edited by rallycross; Mar 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








