I know it have bin tested with a zetec head on a cvh, with bad results.
but what do u call that?

cetec? ctec? cet?

 

twat

 

zecrap?

 

 

 

its just like the people who came up with the ideea of "zvh"

 

Ever thought why no-ones bothered then? lol

Wouldn't be cost or power effective conversion mate

 

Who has actually done this?

 

I no its a stupid question

 

As there is very little differences between the zetec and the CVH apart from the head to block mating faces, i can't see why a zetec head on a CVH shouldn't produce some decent power.

 

Would be even more missions than doing a ZVH though.......all those oil returns missing from the back side!

IMHO anyone who even wasted their time fitting a zetec head on a CVH (PROPERLY) must have money to burn.

 

I might do it for a laugh one day. Would be an interesting project.

 

Would there really be any point in it or anything to prove though

And what bore size would you go for?

 

Probably no point. I'd just have a set of rods and a crank made to the CVH geometry. That would be easier.

Bore size, fuck knows...I said I might try it one day, not that I am drawing up plans to do it!!!

 

can i get a copy of those plans

 

a waist of time and money

 

Well shullup then