Old Mar 9, 2010 | 07:28 PM
  #28  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by opposite lock
i see the point about the 2 maps. I was thinking you,ll have a lower boost setting combined with the ign settings to be more fuel friendly with say 95 ron fuel. Ive never been worried about it but it does state ideas like this on emerald site. Im not keen on 'in car boost adjustors TBH , id rather it set .
I guess a few people will very interested in this thread, so Chip is the ecu 'shitty' from my point of view? Its such a big blow when this is seen being said and can perhaps put people off for no GOOD reason , not havin a digg just purely for the forum , taken to Daves, K3,d you agree thats a good move? Im only putting it across like this as my guess is most people reading this will be non mapping people pretty much just after the result at the end of the day. However i personaly like ALL views but can get tricky sometimes to see through mist and where your at and coming from. Your a top pro mate and 100% take on board what you say.
CheeRS Mike

If you want to run 95 ron and then 97+ron it would be recomended for the ecu to have knock control,
As you will not have a clean tank of 97+ and the engine can experiance dett thought this if the map was run for good power on it.

Mark
Reply