Ford Escort MKII 450hp N/A
19-04-2007, 03:41 AM
#1
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ford Escort MKII 450hp N/A
The engine is completely build in Greece.
Its a YB Cossie engine destroked to 1914cc. Its has custom rods, Supertech custom build pistons for compression up to 17:1. The crank is steel again custom made. Dry sump. Throttle bodies and exhaust again custom made. It uses stand alone engine management, the Haltech E8 with sequential injection. Of course there are a lot of other technical specs which are not published....
Dynosheet from a dynopack dynamometer
Maximum power is 412hp @ 11500 rpm και 28.18 kgr torgue @ 9700 rpm with MotoGP fuel.
Transmission is a Quafie dox box with Quafie diff...
Photos!
I think this is the most powerful naturally aspirated YB engine i know under 2 liters!!!
Enjoy!!!
Its a YB Cossie engine destroked to 1914cc. Its has custom rods, Supertech custom build pistons for compression up to 17:1. The crank is steel again custom made. Dry sump. Throttle bodies and exhaust again custom made. It uses stand alone engine management, the Haltech E8 with sequential injection. Of course there are a lot of other technical specs which are not published....
Dynosheet from a dynopack dynamometer
Maximum power is 412hp @ 11500 rpm και 28.18 kgr torgue @ 9700 rpm with MotoGP fuel.
Transmission is a Quafie dox box with Quafie diff...
Photos!
I think this is the most powerful naturally aspirated YB engine i know under 2 liters!!!
Enjoy!!!
Looks the tits on the mags, in the top pic
Trending Topics
19-04-2007, 06:28 AM
#8
PassionFord Post Troll
Originally Posted by Charlie Chalk
and these are BEEFY!
Doesn't the bloke that owns this car also own the laundrette in Eastenders?
19-04-2007, 07:30 AM
#12
Testing the future
Originally Posted by Graham S1
pure.fookin.sex. 
whats mounted on the left side of the rocker cover?
whats mounted on the left side of the rocker cover?
there are no fucking rockers 
19-04-2007, 07:42 AM
#14
Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Originally Posted by Graham S1
pure.fookin.sex.
whats mounted on the left side of the rocker cover?
whats mounted on the left side of the rocker cover?
there are no fucking rockers 
everyone knows what Graham meant
19-04-2007, 07:48 AM
#15
PassionFord Post Troll
Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Originally Posted by Graham S1
pure.fookin.sex.
whats mounted on the left side of the rocker cover?
whats mounted on the left side of the rocker cover?
there are no fucking rockers 
19-04-2007, 07:50 AM
#16
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fuel makes all the difference in the world. Anybody have any info on what is MotoGP fuel made of? The coating is standard anti-friction coating as in all quality pistons, like the ones in my Zetec turbo
pic here
pic here
19-04-2007, 08:09 AM
#17
Testing the future
Originally Posted by CossieRich
why be so pedantic everyone knows what Graham meant
everyone knows what Graham meant i don't think it's being pedantic (although i am about a lot of things), it's just calling something by it's proper name. you wouldn't call a piston a con rod would you?anyway, that's off topic shit
awesome escort
19-04-2007, 08:56 AM
#21
Advanced PassionFord User
Gareth,
Cos a turb car don't sound like one of these....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxPGFs7Ml34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC9sCw6hY4w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdYwclByOVo
And the 2 red escorts are a little less BHP than the Greek ones...both on slide injection though..
Cos a turb car don't sound like one of these....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxPGFs7Ml34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC9sCw6hY4w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdYwclByOVo
And the 2 red escorts are a little less BHP than the Greek ones...both on slide injection though..
19-04-2007, 10:28 AM
#24
DEYTUKURJERBS
Originally Posted by GARETH T
he could of just stuck a t4 on a standard yb and got a better torque graph!
i dont see the point in the engine
i dont see the point in the engine
has less low/mid performance than a turbo engine of the same peak power, but n/a always will have less, but in the powerband this car will feel totally in another world to drive.
19-04-2007, 10:40 AM
#26
Professional Waffler
Originally Posted by Stavros
Originally Posted by GARETH T
he could of just stuck a t4 on a standard yb and got a better torque graph!
i dont see the point in the engine
i dont see the point in the engine
has less low/mid performance than a turbo engine of the same peak power, but n/a always will have less, but in the powerband this car will feel totally in another world to drive.
a turbo engine would have better low/mid/top torque, the only thing it would lack is in revs,,, but this isnt a problem with the correct gearbox
19-04-2007, 10:44 AM
#28
DEYTUKURJERBS
Originally Posted by GARETH T
Originally Posted by Stavros
Originally Posted by GARETH T
he could of just stuck a t4 on a standard yb and got a better torque graph!
i dont see the point in the engine
i dont see the point in the engine
has less low/mid performance than a turbo engine of the same peak power, but n/a always will have less, but in the powerband this car will feel totally in another world to drive.
a turbo engine would have better low/mid/top torque, the only thing it would lack is in revs,,, but this isnt a problem with the correct gearbox
maybe its built to class regs?
or maybe, like most cars, he is doing it as he can.
19-04-2007, 10:45 AM
#30
Professional Waffler
Originally Posted by Stavros
Originally Posted by GARETH T
Originally Posted by Stavros
Originally Posted by GARETH T
he could of just stuck a t4 on a standard yb and got a better torque graph!
i dont see the point in the engine
i dont see the point in the engine
has less low/mid performance than a turbo engine of the same peak power, but n/a always will have less, but in the powerband this car will feel totally in another world to drive.
a turbo engine would have better low/mid/top torque, the only thing it would lack is in revs,,, but this isnt a problem with the correct gearbox
maybe its built to class regs?
or maybe, like most cars, he is doing it as he can.
19-04-2007, 10:50 AM
#31
Jeebus
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GARETH T
Originally Posted by Stavros
Originally Posted by GARETH T
he could of just stuck a t4 on a standard yb and got a better torque graph!
i dont see the point in the engine
i dont see the point in the engine
has less low/mid performance than a turbo engine of the same peak power, but n/a always will have less, but in the powerband this car will feel totally in another world to drive.
a turbo engine would have better low/mid/top torque, the only thing it would lack is in revs,,, but this isnt a problem with the correct gearbox
19-04-2007, 11:54 AM
#34
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SE London
Posts: 4,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome car, but 211lb/ft of torque is a HELL of a lot for a 1.9 litre N/A engine.... is that even feasible?
I'm not questioning that there's clearly loads of development work gone into it, and it's a very impressive lump, but I've always been under the impression that even on a normally aspriated full race engine with £££££££££££s of development work, over 100lb/ft per litre is simply not going to happen.
I'm not questioning that there's clearly loads of development work gone into it, and it's a very impressive lump, but I've always been under the impression that even on a normally aspriated full race engine with £££££££££££s of development work, over 100lb/ft per litre is simply not going to happen.
19-04-2007, 01:12 PM
#37
Regular Contributor
Originally Posted by Markb_s1
Awesome car, but 211lb/ft of torque is a HELL of a lot for a 1.9 litre N/A engine.... is that even feasible?
I'm not questioning that there's clearly loads of development work gone into it, and it's a very impressive lump, but I've always been under the impression that even on a normally aspriated full race engine with £££££££££££s of development work, over 100lb/ft per litre is simply not going to happen.
I'm not questioning that there's clearly loads of development work gone into it, and it's a very impressive lump, but I've always been under the impression that even on a normally aspriated full race engine with £££££££££££s of development work, over 100lb/ft per litre is simply not going to happen.
