Technical help Q & A Got A technical problem with you car? Keep it in here where the techies hang out and we will try to solve it for you!!

Ideal intercooler pipework diameter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 11:02 AM
  #1  
r44flyer's Avatar
r44flyer
Thread Starter
15000
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default Ideal intercooler pipework diameter

Hi all,

Although I have a Rover, and not a Ford, I was wondering if anyone could please help me with this query.

I am wondering if I would be creating any problems, flow wise, by using 2" ID pipework instead of 2.5" for the pipework run between turbo and throttle body. The car will be making circa 220bhp with a T28 (200SX) turbo, with 2x 2WD Cosworth intercoolers welded together to give a dual pass front mount.

Will 2" pipework flow enough for my requirements, or is it definitely necessary to use 2.5"? I'm not convinced the 'bigger is always better' argument applies here, if 2" is good enough. I already have the whole run in 2" ready to go on the car but need to know if I need to go to the expense of upgrading the whole lot to 2.5".

Thanks for the help.

Jim
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 05:37 PM
  #2  
SafeChav's Avatar
SafeChav
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,798
Likes: 1
From: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
Default

Like anything where air flow is involved the smaller it is the more restrictive it can be. But again, like anything, its only as good as its weakest link, so if anything else in the path has a smaller diameter than 2.5" its pointless.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 06:25 PM
  #3  
r44flyer's Avatar
r44flyer
Thread Starter
15000
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Makes sense.

The smallest restriction is in fact the compressor outlet, which is slightly less than 2". ID increases at intercooler to 2.5" on inlet and outlet, but not again until TB.


Jim
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #4  
foreigneRS's Avatar
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,597
Likes: 24
From: W. Sussex
Default

SafeChav not true. fluid dynamics ae very complicated, and the resistance to flow depends on the length as well as the cross sectional area, radius of bends, changes in cross sectional area, surface roughness of the pipes and much more

all it will mean though, is that if you want 2 bar boost at the throttle body or plenum or wherever you're going to measure it with your gauge or whatever, the more pressure drop between there and the compressor there is, the harder the compressor has to work.

if you make the compressor work harder, you make the compressed air hotter, which makes your intercooler more work to do.

everything is a compromise though
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #5  
SafeChav's Avatar
SafeChav
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,798
Likes: 1
From: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
Default

foreigneRS, i have to admit after posting that i did think about it again and remember about the factors like the length of the restriction, but realistically at the sort of power he is aiming for its not going to be that critical, IMO
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #6  
r44flyer's Avatar
r44flyer
Thread Starter
15000
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

I'm hoping to keep pipe runs as short as possible in comparison to standard, and hope to try and use at least the longest of the standard boost pipes (IC>TB).

Using 2x cossie intercoolers should offer a good gain over standard, plus a T28 will reduce intake temps further... so yes, everything is a compromise.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
abz474
Cars for Sale
9
Nov 1, 2015 06:53 PM
Fudgey
General Car Related Discussion.
21
Sep 30, 2015 06:19 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34 PM.