Dingy

Anyone.....

COMEDY DAN

Which thread.......?

The tyre thread that went a bit pear shaped?

CossieRich

iTrader: (1)

Dingy,

did your post involve:

Rolling Roads
Rod
Mark
Ahmed
anyone to do with MAD
Arse Dyno

If so that is why it was removed

Mike Rainbird

iTrader: (3)

Steve,
Just checked and it is in the Sin Bin. However, whoever did it did not state who it was (as they are supposed to), nor the reason why. Having read it, I am mystified as to why it was sin-binned rather than at worst, should have been put in "Mis-palced Dummy" forum. Obviously with it being a requirement to explain the reasons behind the move, I will find out.

CossieRich

iTrader: (1)

Mike,

Just move it back in here. Its bound to be an amusing thread if the Ding-a-ling is involved

Mr RS500

iTrader: (6)

Because your a gimp dingle ,,lol,,

Mike Rainbird

iTrader: (3)

That's not the way we do things . I will find out the reasoning behind the move first - as once explained - I may agree with it .

FYI the thread was just bemoaning the woes that he has had with his gearbox .

CossieRich

iTrader: (1)

rofl i love this place sometimes

Stu @ M Developments

iTrader: (12)

Ive just looked too and there is swearing in the title Mike.

Maybe you should read the rules.

Mike Rainbird

iTrader: (3)

I didn't read the title, I just read the content .

Perhaps you should read the rules as well, as the mod should put in who moved it and why .

Stu @ M Developments

iTrader: (12)

I wrote the rules Mike, i have no need to read them... and nobody questioned the mod being wrong for not putting why, although in this case its so obvious its a mute point.

CossieRich

iTrader: (1)

ohhhhhhhhhhh i say. Handbags are out

Mike Rainbird

iTrader: (3)

They should still apply to you . Also, I think binning it because he wrote "fooking" in the title is a bit extreme . No wonder I didn't spot it .

Stu @ M Developments

iTrader: (12)

Eh? They do apply to me. What are you talking about now Mike?

Mike Rainbird

iTrader: (3)

I thought you were suggesting that you moved it, but didn't put down that it was you and the reason why .

Should this one go too - is obvious that it is a swear word (as much as "fooking" anyway? )

https://passionford.com/forum/showthread.php?t=236180

CossieRich

iTrader: (1)

lol

JamesH

iTrader: (21)

I think what Mike means if you moved it!

Mike, you'll get the sack soon

Dingy

There is no swearing in the title stu.

Stu @ M Developments

iTrader: (12)

Really? Where do i possibly suggest that?

Its Not your day for reading threads properly then is it Mike?

Dingy

PMSL I didn't mention any names or slag anyone off....

Can you actually Read ?

Mike Rainbird

iTrader: (3)

I see, so you're "assuming" the reason for the move .

Dingy

AM offended by this title

https://passionford.com/forum/general-car-related-discussion/236181-is-there-any-gays-here.html

Does this get removed ?

Even the BBC allows swearing of sorts LOL

Christian and Beccy

iTrader: (14)

Man, there's some sexual tension going on in here.

Turbosystems

iTrader: (5)

looks like we have a severe case of
PMT pre mike tension
PST pre stu tension
PDT pre dingy tension
let the biatch slapping commence

ESCYSCOTT

iTrader: (1)

why didn't the mod just edit the title??

ESCYSCOTT

iTrader: (1)

Is that you coming out Dingy?

Stu @ M Developments

iTrader: (12)

I wrote the rules.
Topic in question contradicts the rules.
Topic has been binned.

Assumption? I just assume the webteam are doing their Job as it is quite rightly in the Bin, where as you on the other hand just seem to be trying to cause trouble in public for some reason instead of just saying "Sorry Steve, I missed the title, thats almost certainly why it is in the Bin, please word your titles more carefully in future to avoid this happening".

Topic Closed.

Stu @ M Developments

iTrader: (12)

If you are offended by the discussion of Gay topics in Public, please feel free to voice your concerns to a moderator, or use the report function.

Mike Rainbird

iTrader: (3)

Stu,
I honestly wouldn't have viewed "Fooking" as a swear word. I would see it the same as "Fecking", which doesn't seem to be considered one either.

You can turn it round to anything you like .

Stu @ M Developments

iTrader: (12)

So if Caitlin started writing "Fooking" on her school books, you and Jen would be fine with that yeah?

Bollocks Mike. Or at least, i hope its Bollocks as i had you down as better parents.

Rules are Rules. End of discussion. people have even started topics this week with regards the amount of swear words visible on teh home page, its getting ridiculous and needs sorting.