twin towers
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by abdr500
its sad realy but thats happeing every day around the world terroist are killers and we know who the terrorist are tony blair and mr bush
I watched it and those people on board had some guts....must have been driven by adrenanline and determination! RIP
#10
Originally Posted by abdr500
Lee Reynolds
you fool i hope they all rest in peace to all that was in the plane this has got to stop but it wount if blair and bush carry on the way they are
you fool i hope they all rest in peace to all that was in the plane this has got to stop but it wount if blair and bush carry on the way they are
#12
Originally Posted by abdr500
Lee Reynolds
you prat you belive what you want but bottom line is bush and blair should not be in powere
you prat you belive what you want but bottom line is bush and blair should not be in powere
Yeah yeah! This has been done to the death on PF so i aint going into it with you! Plus i have read a lot of your past posts and your intelligence level is far too low down for me to come!
#17
Originally Posted by abdr500
its sad realy but thats happeing every day around the world terroist are killers and we know who the terrorist are tony blair and mr bush
Abdr500,might I ask what nationality you are,please ??
Jayen4.
#18
Irritating c........
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,265
Likes: 147
From: The Dark Side of the Moon...
Originally Posted by abdr500
thats cool because im not realy intrested you no nothing about my intelligence
Whilst I am no supporter of the Bush/Blair way, the fact remains that 9/11 happened BEFORE the Brits and Yanks went to war on Iraq. So it is virtually impossible for the 9/11 tragedy to have been as a result of the Blair/Bush leadership. The 9/11 attacks had nothing to do with us Brits anyway, and to be fair it had very little to do with Bush either - it had to do with the way the Americans had treated the Afghans and Islams in the past, and was an attack motivated by religious war.
So stop following the crowed and trying to sound like you know what you are talking about and find out the facts first, before shooting your gob off on a subject you know very little about
#19
Lee Reynolds
As Jeremy Clarkson said in an article, invading Iraq after 9/11 had about as much sense as if America had attacked China after Pearl Harbour
Sadamn was an evil dictator but he didn't support terrorism I agree removing sadamn was a good thing, I just don't like the way it was rushed, we were lied too so we would suport our leaders (45 min warning crap) evan Bush himself said that the information they had was wrong. I have begun to wonder if this "information" ever did exist.
Occupying countrys in this sort of way, does nothing but enhance the anti-west feeling in Arab countrys and thus breeds terrorism. Just look at how the IRA gain support after bloody Sunday
As Jeremy Clarkson said in an article, invading Iraq after 9/11 had about as much sense as if America had attacked China after Pearl Harbour
Sadamn was an evil dictator but he didn't support terrorism I agree removing sadamn was a good thing, I just don't like the way it was rushed, we were lied too so we would suport our leaders (45 min warning crap) evan Bush himself said that the information they had was wrong. I have begun to wonder if this "information" ever did exist.
Occupying countrys in this sort of way, does nothing but enhance the anti-west feeling in Arab countrys and thus breeds terrorism. Just look at how the IRA gain support after bloody Sunday
#21
Originally Posted by Chipperx2
Lee Reynolds
As Jeremy Clarkson said in an article, invading Iraq after 9/11 had about as much sense as if America had attacked China after Pearl Harbour
Sadamn was an evil dictator but he didn't support terrorism ?
As Jeremy Clarkson said in an article, invading Iraq after 9/11 had about as much sense as if America had attacked China after Pearl Harbour
Sadamn was an evil dictator but he didn't support terrorism ?
WTF???? he terrorised his own people! So how do you get that? Seriously where are you guys educated?
#24
Terrorising your own people does not mean you support terrorism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist
(Last 2 lines of the second paragraph.)
Sadamn had an Army so therefore cannot be called a terrorist
If you want a slagging match on academic achievments, then I bet I beat you
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist
(Last 2 lines of the second paragraph.)
Sadamn had an Army so therefore cannot be called a terrorist
If you want a slagging match on academic achievments, then I bet I beat you
#25
Originally Posted by Chipperx2
Terrorising your own people does not mean you support terrorism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist
Sadamn had an Army so therefore cannot be called a terrorist
If you want a slagging match on academic achievments, then I bet I beat you
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist
Sadamn had an Army so therefore cannot be called a terrorist
If you want a slagging match on academic achievments, then I bet I beat you
He was a terroist! End of! No matter how some people like to word it....he was!
Academic acheivments mean nothing to me mate, experience counts and youre still a kid!
#28
Originally Posted by abdr500
Jayen4
what are you then and even if you told me it will mean shit to any one as you cannot tell so dont wast your time
what are you then and even if you told me it will mean shit to any one as you cannot tell so dont wast your time
#29
Originally Posted by abdr500
Jayen4
what are you then and even if you told me it will mean shit to any one as you cannot tell so dont wast your time
what are you then and even if you told me it will mean shit to any one as you cannot tell so dont wast your time
#30
To you if means nothing, but in some fields it means alot, you were the one who asked where I was educated?
As for Sadamn he never attacked America,not once unless they were invading his country, I agree its proberly better in thelong run that he was removed, but don't kid yourself as too the motives behind the war in Iraq, it was nothing to do with terrorism. Bush doesn't give a shit about terrorising people or he wouldn't advocate torture and keeping people locked up for years without trial in Cuba.
Open your eyes too the millions of lies, its all about money and power, same old keeping the rich, rich, and the poor opressed.
As for Sadamn he never attacked America,not once unless they were invading his country, I agree its proberly better in thelong run that he was removed, but don't kid yourself as too the motives behind the war in Iraq, it was nothing to do with terrorism. Bush doesn't give a shit about terrorising people or he wouldn't advocate torture and keeping people locked up for years without trial in Cuba.
Open your eyes too the millions of lies, its all about money and power, same old keeping the rich, rich, and the poor opressed.
#31
.
we shouldnt be fighting amoungst ourselves, we shoud stay together to help stop this and bulling which this is a form of,
if anybody think what happened on9/11 is right please do not post here then, and keep it yourself
if anybody think what happened on9/11 is right please do not post here then, and keep it yourself
#35
Originally Posted by Chipperx2
To you if means nothing, but in some fields it means alot, you were the one who asked where I was educated?
As for Sadamn he never attacked America,not once unless they were invading his country, I agree its proberly better in thelong run that he was removed, but don't kid yourself as too the motives behind the war in Iraq, it was nothing to do with terrorism. Bush doesn't give a shit about terrorising people or he wouldn't advocate torture and keeping people locked up for years without trial in Cuba.
Open your eyes too the millions of lies, its all about money and power, same old keeping the rich, rich, and the poor opressed.
As for Sadamn he never attacked America,not once unless they were invading his country, I agree its proberly better in thelong run that he was removed, but don't kid yourself as too the motives behind the war in Iraq, it was nothing to do with terrorism. Bush doesn't give a shit about terrorising people or he wouldn't advocate torture and keeping people locked up for years without trial in Cuba.
Open your eyes too the millions of lies, its all about money and power, same old keeping the rich, rich, and the poor opressed.
Doesnt matter what Blair and Bush do, or should i say the uk and America, they will still attack us as they did in NY and London..period! I mean look at us, we give them homes, jobs, money and they bomb us!
#38
Originally Posted by abdr500
Lee Reynolds
you dont know what your talking about .dont wast your time on this post
you dont know what your talking about .dont wast your time on this post
#40
we are debating the legality of the War in Iraq etc, nothing to do with the attacks on 9/11, speaking as someone whos been to the top of one of them back in 2000 I would never support the attacks or evan begin to forgive the madmen that did it.
What I was saying that the links to it and the regime in Iraq at the time were non-evident and were fabricated as to decive the public into supporting the war using the most powerful weapon- fear and distrust
What I was saying that the links to it and the regime in Iraq at the time were non-evident and were fabricated as to decive the public into supporting the war using the most powerful weapon- fear and distrust