General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

What would a standard focus 1.6 do the 1/4 mile in ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16-12-2005, 09:33 PM
  #1  
Benni
Ban[B][/B]ned
Thread Starter
 
Benni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Pool.
Posts: 34,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default What would a standard focus 1.6 do the 1/4 mile in ?

An RS does it in 14.5 seconds so i reckon my 1.6 would do it in about 20 What do you think ?
Old 16-12-2005, 10:35 PM
  #2  
Ex-Finesse
PassionFord Regular
 
Ex-Finesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Medway / Maidstone, Kent
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A 100ps (I think ) 1.6 can do them in 17 dead! Was done at Santa pod, with video evidence!

I was amazed at the time, as 17 dead is a good 1.8 escort time!!

Under 17.5 is good going
Old 16-12-2005, 11:28 PM
  #3  
AndyRST
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
AndyRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FPMSL @ 17 sec dead for a 100bhp 1.6

A ST170 will only manage a 16- 16.5 sec and has 70bhp gain, a higher rev limit and alot more torque than a 1.6. Wake up and smell the coffee pal, infact theres a 400+ bhp RST forsale on Ebay, if you think a 1.6 does a 17 sec 1/4 then you'll believe that RST is 400bhp and a bargain
Old 16-12-2005, 11:32 PM
  #4  
Benni
Ban[B][/B]ned
Thread Starter
 
Benni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Pool.
Posts: 34,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The rev Range on an ST Is no better than any other focus...
Old 16-12-2005, 11:33 PM
  #5  
MichaelG
Too many posts.. I need a life!!

 
MichaelG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyRST
FPMSL @ 17 sec dead for a 100bhp 1.6

A ST170 will only manage a 16- 16.5 sec and has 70bhp gain, a higher rev limit and alot more torque than a 1.6. Wake up and smell the coffee pal, infact theres a 400+ bhp RST forsale on Ebay, if you think a 1.6 does a 17 sec 1/4 then you'll believe that RST is 400bhp and a bargain
LOL i aint heard "wake up and smell the coffee PAL" in yeeeeeeeeeears!!
Old 16-12-2005, 11:38 PM
  #6  
Ex-Finesse
PassionFord Regular
 
Ex-Finesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Medway / Maidstone, Kent
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyRST
FPMSL @ 17 sec dead for a 100bhp 1.6

A ST170 will only manage a 16- 16.5 sec and has 70bhp gain, a higher rev limit and alot more torque than a 1.6. Wake up and smell the coffee pal, infact theres a 400+ bhp RST forsale on Ebay, if you think a 1.6 does a 17 sec 1/4 then you'll believe that RST is 400bhp and a bargain
What can I say...

We had a massive argument on Escort Evolution about this.. but it is true. There is video proof.

Also, please remember 1/4mile times are heavily down to the driver. Many ST170 times are in the 16s, but there are some in the 15s. Obviously the better drivers.

My 2.0L escort (135bhp) did a 15.73 @ Santa Pod. As a 1.6, it did a 17.90

Don't treat me like an idiot - I know that "400bhp" RST is B/S.

My mate has the video, I could probably get the link if u really wanted me to, but how about you accept the fact i'm not lying??
Old 16-12-2005, 11:45 PM
  #7  
Benni
Ban[B][/B]ned
Thread Starter
 
Benni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Pool.
Posts: 34,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey...I didnt wanna start an argument lads.If he says he seen it do it in 17s then it must of He has no reason to lie really.
Old 16-12-2005, 11:49 PM
  #8  
Ex-Finesse
PassionFord Regular
 
Ex-Finesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Medway / Maidstone, Kent
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Spot on fella! It's not my car, I'm not trying to sell it, so why would I lie?!

Awesome time though

Just to add, it was standard bar some massive tailpipe.
Old 17-12-2005, 12:11 AM
  #9  
Benni
Ban[B][/B]ned
Thread Starter
 
Benni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Pool.
Posts: 34,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice... Will take mine down to the pod sometime i hope and see what it does.... I know TDCI's do it around the same as a 2.0 focus
Old 17-12-2005, 12:37 AM
  #10  
Kapritwin1
15000
 
Kapritwin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL it is my 1.6 focus in question.

http://www.escortevolution.co.uk/for...howtopic=55452

I did it in 17sec dead I did it @ the start of this year @ santa pod with the car being completley standard engine wise.
Its a bit late but I should have the report sheet that I got from the day and I could detail the diffrent stages of the run if anyone was interested.

Shaun
Old 17-12-2005, 12:48 AM
  #11  
AndyRST
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
AndyRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FPMSL, yeah ok im wrong. With 50+ runs over the 4 yrs i been doing RWYB's and the countless others i have attended supporting other RS Owners i know nothing about what it takes to run a good 1/4 and what sort of power makes what sort of times @ Santa Pod
Old 17-12-2005, 12:49 AM
  #12  
rsnissan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
 
rsnissan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyRST
FPMSL, yeah ok im wrong. With 50+ runs over the 4 yrs i been doing RWYB's and the countless others i have attended supporting other RS Owners i know nothing about what it takes to run a good 1/4 and what sort of power makes what sort of times @ Santa Pod
sounds sooooooooooo convincing
Old 17-12-2005, 12:50 AM
  #13  
Kapritwin1
15000
 
Kapritwin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The orginal post but the vids no longer are hosted Might be able to find it 2morow.

http://www.escortevolution.co.uk/for...40251&hl=Santa
Old 17-12-2005, 12:53 AM
  #14  
Kapritwin1
15000
 
Kapritwin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyRST
FPMSL, yeah ok im wrong. With 50+ runs over the 4 yrs i been doing RWYB's and the countless others i have attended supporting other RS Owners i know nothing about what it takes to run a good 1/4 and what sort of power makes what sort of times @ Santa Pod
Good for you fella youve had much more practise than I have but I can only tell you what I did, I have no reason to bul11shit its what I did.
Old 17-12-2005, 12:59 AM
  #15  
AndyRST
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
AndyRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsnissan
Originally Posted by AndyRST
FPMSL, yeah ok im wrong. With 50+ runs over the 4 yrs i been doing RWYB's and the countless others i have attended supporting other RS Owners i know nothing about what it takes to run a good 1/4 and what sort of power makes what sort of times @ Santa Pod
sounds sooooooooooo convincing
Well would you believe a car with around the same weight, 70 less bhp, longer ratio gearbox through 3rd, 4th and 5th making it slower accelerating (as the ST170 has close ratio 6 spd box) would be between 0.5 - 1 sec slower over 1/4 mile ? and that this is all dependant on the driver?

BTW Ben yeah i would estimate that a std 1.6 focus would complete the 1/4 in around 18-19 secs. Also i believe the ST170 has steel rods and because of that a higher rev limit of 7200 rpm (or 7400 rpm with a bluefin) than other Focus's inc the RS
Old 17-12-2005, 01:03 AM
  #16  
AndyRST
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
AndyRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kapritwin1
Originally Posted by AndyRST
FPMSL, yeah ok im wrong. With 50+ runs over the 4 yrs i been doing RWYB's and the countless others i have attended supporting other RS Owners i know nothing about what it takes to run a good 1/4 and what sort of power makes what sort of times @ Santa Pod
Good for you fella youve had much more practise than I have but I can only tell you what I did, I have no reason to bul11shit its what I did.
Fair enough, you have a "sepcial" 1.6 there then

Just out of interest how many other 17 sec runs have you done with this std 1.6 focus ?
Old 17-12-2005, 01:14 AM
  #17  
Kapritwin1
15000
 
Kapritwin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My times Ive had for santa pod are

17.773 @78.25
17.336 @78.54
17.567 @79.36
17.404 @79.38
17.384 @79.49
17.340 @79.10
17.113 @80.08
&
17.093 @80.64 <-- This is what people class as a 17sec dead.

And as they say the proof is in the pudding



























If you look @ the date it was at the start of the year. It had no mods not even a filter or the stupid large tail pipe it now has.

I got a 17.1 something @ a recent RWYB day but didnt get the slip as I only had one run and it was stupid busy as it was after a big jap fest type thing.
Old 17-12-2005, 01:17 AM
  #18  
AndyRST
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
AndyRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well im looking for a "special" 1.6 std focus now then
Old 17-12-2005, 01:23 AM
  #19  
Kapritwin1
15000
 
Kapritwin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyRST
Well im looking for a "special" 1.6 std focus now then
I cant work out if your being funny or what now lol.

Im not a huge santa pod fan only went up as my mate had a MR2 and he wanted to try it out.

Anyway im getting rid of it as I know its not a fast car and ive never said it was and im not gonna get it to go any faster so im selling up for a ERST or simialr.
Old 17-12-2005, 01:34 AM
  #20  
AndyRST
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
AndyRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 17-12-2005, 11:16 AM
  #21  
Benni
Ban[B][/B]ned
Thread Starter
 
Benni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Pool.
Posts: 34,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well him saying it did it in 17 seconds was enough for me
Old 17-12-2005, 12:38 PM
  #22  
James-W
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
James-W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ben with you driving it would be in the tens.
Old 17-12-2005, 01:03 PM
  #23  
zippyobrien
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
zippyobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: reading
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

(as the ST170 has close ratio 6 spd box)[/quote]

i was under the impression that the st170 didnt have a close ration box at all, when i went in one i felt the gears were far to streched out and that the car could be alot quicker with better ratios

fair play on the 17 sec pass, only 3 secs slower than alot of rs turbos with twice the power, TOP RESULT
Old 17-12-2005, 01:14 PM
  #24  
focusv8
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
focusv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 4,771
Received 86 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Some times here:

http://ffoc.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.ph...dc8246c2112d9b
Old 17-12-2005, 01:18 PM
  #25  
Daviet
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Daviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Scotland,Edinburgh
Posts: 4,463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

andy his maybe isnt special its maybe yours thats "special"
Old 17-12-2005, 01:37 PM
  #26  
Oranoco
Professional Waffler
 
Oranoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HertFORDshire
Posts: 25,425
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zippyobrien
17 sec pass, only 3 secs slower than alot of rs turbos with twice the power
3 seconds in ź mile terms is a lifetime
Old 17-12-2005, 01:57 PM
  #27  
croppy
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
croppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: southampton
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not being funny but why r u arguing over a few seconds and why in the first place would u wanna try 1/4 mile run's in a standard 1.6 car
Old 17-12-2005, 02:33 PM
  #28  
focusv8
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
focusv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 4,771
Received 86 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by croppy
not being funny but why r u arguing over a few seconds and why in the first place would u wanna try 1/4 mile run's in a standard 1.6 car
A difference of a one hundredth of a second means win or loose, fastest or slowest,,, seconds really matter.

Time of a standard car is just as important as a modded car.

I did over 80 runs with my "Standard car".
Old 17-12-2005, 02:37 PM
  #29  
Kapritwin1
15000
 
Kapritwin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Watford
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by croppy
not being funny but why r u arguing over a few seconds and why in the first place would u wanna try 1/4 mile run's in a standard 1.6 car
Like I said I only went down as a mate had his MR2 and didnt wanna go by himself so I thought I might give it a go.

I agree with the comment that 3secs is a lifetime on a 1/4mile because the other car is going so much faster and you cant do anything about it, thats why its for sale as its to slow, lol.

We wernt arguing just having a nice conversation about it. lol
Old 17-12-2005, 03:17 PM
  #30  
DUDE_SWEET_FRST
Advanced PassionFord User
 
DUDE_SWEET_FRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: BURTON ON TRENT
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just goes to show, people try to shoot you down, and still continue when you have proven them wrong
Old 17-12-2005, 04:25 PM
  #31  
Ex-Finesse
PassionFord Regular
 
Ex-Finesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Medway / Maidstone, Kent
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by croppy
not being funny but why r u arguing over a few seconds and why in the first place would u wanna try 1/4 mile run's in a standard 1.6 car
Because it's fun? Sitting on the line does get your adrenline going!

Also, it's a good base to see how much quicker cars with modded engines are over standard.

Have you ever done one?
Old 17-12-2005, 06:47 PM
  #32  
Benni
Ban[B][/B]ned
Thread Starter
 
Benni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Pool.
Posts: 34,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree with ex-finnese... It is all good fun modified or not... And i cant wait to go down and give mine a blast
Old 17-12-2005, 09:07 PM
  #33  
James
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South West
Posts: 5,224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DUDE_SWEET_FRST
just goes to show, people try to shoot you down, and still continue when you have proven them wrong
lmao, sooo true!

i think you will find the 1.6 engine is better designed in almost everyway possible than the 1.8/2.0 focus's. It's an all alloy block so is going to be lighter than the others & the ST 6 speed is apprently very short so you're always changing gear=not good for the old 1/4 mile times.

Parents used to have one, can't remeber whether it was 1.4 or 1.6 but it had enough poke in it, more than the 1.8 duratec they have now anyways.
Old 17-12-2005, 10:55 PM
  #34  
AndyRST
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
AndyRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James
i think you will find the 1.6 engine is better designed in almost everyway possible than the 1.8/2.0 focus's. It's an all alloy block so is going to be lighter than the others & the ST 6 speed is apprently very short so you're always changing gear=not good for the old 1/4 mile times.
FPMSL @ 1.6 being a better designed engine Im gonna tell Ford that i want a 1.6 fitted in my focus cos its a better design than my 2.0l 16V ST170 engine

how is a 6 speed box with close ratios worse for 1/4? If it improves the acceleration in 2nd, 4rd, 4th and 5th how can it be bad for 1/4 mile times ?
Old 17-12-2005, 10:58 PM
  #35  
Benni
Ban[B][/B]ned
Thread Starter
 
Benni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Pool.
Posts: 34,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dunno...Maybe you loose time with all the gear changes lol
Old 17-12-2005, 11:19 PM
  #36  
Cossie Sean
big floppy donkey dick
 
Cossie Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rouse Sport heaven ;)
Posts: 4,514
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

instead of timing equipment,
on the non-ST/RS focus, we normaly use a calander to measure performance times
Old 17-12-2005, 11:25 PM
  #37  
Cossie Sean
big floppy donkey dick
 
Cossie Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rouse Sport heaven ;)
Posts: 4,514
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyRST
Originally Posted by James
i think you will find the 1.6 engine is better designed in almost everyway possible than the 1.8/2.0 focus's. It's an all alloy block so is going to be lighter than the others & the ST 6 speed is apprently very short so you're always changing gear=not good for the old 1/4 mile times.


how is a 6 speed box with close ratios worse for 1/4? If it improves the acceleration in 2nd, 4rd, 4th and 5th how can it be bad for 1/4 mile times ?
i didnt read this full post,
with a 6sp box i`d imagine you`d loose time due to gearchanges??!!! fords figures may be a little optimistic IMO
the small engines focus/fiestas are fookin revvy little cnuts!
propper zetec engined foci` seem slugish in comparison, hence why the polices use yamaha powered foci arround the north east.
Old 18-12-2005, 12:06 AM
  #38  
AndyRST
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
AndyRST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i bet the time it takes to change gear is easy made up by the fact the engine is able to rev faster and therefore inscrease speed faster
Old 18-12-2005, 07:54 AM
  #39  
croppy
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
croppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: southampton
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ex-Finesse

Have you ever done one?
as soon as my 450bhp engine is fitted in my 3door and run in set up on full power then surely i'm gonna but with 400--450 it'll be worth it


Old 18-12-2005, 08:09 AM
  #40  
James
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South West
Posts: 5,224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cossie Sean
Originally Posted by AndyRST
Originally Posted by James
i think you will find the 1.6 engine is better designed in almost everyway possible than the 1.8/2.0 focus's. It's an all alloy block so is going to be lighter than the others & the ST 6 speed is apprently very short so you're always changing gear=not good for the old 1/4 mile times.


how is a 6 speed box with close ratios worse for 1/4? If it improves the acceleration in 2nd, 4rd, 4th and 5th how can it be bad for 1/4 mile times ?
i didnt read this full post,
with a 6sp box i`d imagine you`d loose time due to gearchanges??!!! fords figures may be a little optimistic IMO
the small engines focus/fiestas are fookin revvy little cnuts!
propper zetec engined foci` seem slugish in comparison, hence why the polices use yamaha powered foci arround the north east.
Exactly.


Quick Reply: What would a standard focus 1.6 do the 1/4 mile in ?



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:53 AM.