General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

My Engine specs...please help!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2005, 04:08 PM
  #1  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default My Engine specs...please help!

...right as i am going Grp A type replica i think i want to go rally style engine...my new unit is 7.9-1 comp ratio with big ported head and big cams...what power did a grp a run?????I am happy to run 4 greys and anti lag on the T34 .63 with my engine mods how do i get say 500ft lb and 300bhp?...I take it restrictor...if you derestrict i assume the torque comes down...i want blistering 0-60 times like the real rally car not interested in top end....
Old 08-11-2005, 04:16 PM
  #2  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

500lb ft would kill the gearbox with one press of the pedal .

Drop the final drive to 3.9 and get engine converted to "Billabong" spec (will STILL need a big tooth gearkit) .
Old 08-11-2005, 04:19 PM
  #3  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mike...nope i want a full rally type spec well as close as the grp a cars....does the restrictor get you the torque?

Come on pf give me your knowledge

I want 0-60 in 3 secs in the wet and whatever a rally car goes top end!

Transmission aint an issue will all be sorted.
Old 08-11-2005, 04:20 PM
  #4  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Why will a restrictor gain you anything at all?

Im not 100% it wont, but cant see how it can at all.
Seems like a myth to me.

Rally engines are so torquey due to engine spec, not the restrictor.
Unless a rectrictor cures compressor surge which is what enables the cars to run 3.5bar+ or whatever mad boost spike they run, which is of course what gives you torque.

Id love to REALLY know, all i hear is rumours.
Old 08-11-2005, 04:20 PM
  #5  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator
PassionFord Gold Member (Male)
Official PassionFord Trader
Administrator
iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Skim a lump off the head to get the compression back to something sensible, run 40psi peak and keep the restrictor to stop even you making an arse of your power goal, that will put you in the ballpark.
Old 08-11-2005, 04:21 PM
  #6  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

how do you imagine that a restrictor gives you more torque?

absolutely clueless
Old 08-11-2005, 04:22 PM
  #7  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

you gotta look at how power and torque is connected
Old 08-11-2005, 04:24 PM
  #8  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Phil,
I have been driven in a rally car with restrictor on the road and they are PANTs. Do NOT go down this route, you WILL be dissappointed. Power tails off so much at top end that it feels like a parachute has been deployed . You certainly will not want 4.4 diffs .

I'm serious about Bill's engine - TRY it, it WILL blow your mind .
Old 08-11-2005, 04:27 PM
  #9  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
how do you imagine that a restrictor gives you more torque?

absolutely clueless
To allow rediculous boost peaks without surge thus getting the torque?

...clueless is better than being German in my book!
Old 08-11-2005, 04:28 PM
  #10  
Disabled Account
Banned
 
Disabled Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Phil,
I have been driven in a rally car with restrictor on the road and they are PANTs. Do NOT go down this route, you WILL be dissappointed. Power tails off so much at top end that it feels like a parachute has been deployed . You certainly will not want 4.4 diffs
Mike, were some of the rally engines also very low compression....like 6.8:1 ? I noticed in the Cosworth catalogue that they do 6.8: 1 comp pistons....
Old 08-11-2005, 04:30 PM
  #11  
allsteel
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
allsteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North EAST
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rally motors were running high compressions,around the 9 mark and had small ports in the head.Big ports for power,small ports for torque.Oh and a nice drop of 102 octane fuel.
Old 08-11-2005, 04:31 PM
  #12  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Doug,
That was the TOURING cars, the rally cars run massive high compression to compensate for the lack of boost at the top end that the restrictor dictates. The Grp A cars were running 9.5:1, which increased to over 10:1 for the "world" engines.
Old 08-11-2005, 04:31 PM
  #13  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

so now you can read other peoples replies and repeat them parrot fashion you're an engine guru?
Old 08-11-2005, 04:32 PM
  #14  
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Porkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Drop the final drive to 3.9 .
One of the best mods I ever did to my car. Transformed it

and you should have bought my freshly rebuilt bigtooth box. That was a Steal at Ł2500!
Old 08-11-2005, 04:33 PM
  #15  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

...will a T34 DO 40psi?.....

Mike i think i would retain std gearing as i know what you mean about 4.44!!!

Billys engine is just like my old T38 specced one but maybe a little quicker...so bgeen there done that and will agree VERY fast...BUT if i restrict it as Stu says on a .63 then massive torque but say 18psi at top end for the 300ish bhp....then i cant blow it up thru no fuel top end NOT that i have ever done that
Old 08-11-2005, 04:35 PM
  #16  
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Porkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why not drop the Final drive Phil? Its a great great mod
Old 08-11-2005, 04:38 PM
  #17  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

German bloke you laughed at a restricter making more torque We should be laughing at YOU If it allows higher boost to be sort then surely it makes more power?

Ok so i need smaller ports...got that here SO i could do this to my EEC4 engine thats done 37k miles...8-1 ish P8...then put the GT35 on the other engine when this pisses me off
Old 08-11-2005, 04:39 PM
  #18  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Phil,
For short periods, but I'm sure like the rally teams you'll replace it regularly anyway .

If you want the PUNCH and aren't interest in top speed, go to the 3.9 diffs .

If you think that would make a nice road engine, you're living in a dream world. Listen to what I said about having been in the car thus equipped (I'm talking about an Ex-Ford works car as well - one that cost Ł250k to build ). My sapphire which only had 385bhp would have MURDERED it on anything other than a rally stage or really tight twisty track. I was so dissappointed with the performance it was unreal (obviously the handling was on a different planet, but on track, it's power and gearing would have hampered it beyond belief).
Old 08-11-2005, 04:39 PM
  #19  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

...when you say difference Porkie in what way...just quicker accelration?
Old 08-11-2005, 04:41 PM
  #20  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Phil,
Sharpens up the response and because it shortens the gears, reduces the feeling of the lag .
Old 08-11-2005, 04:41 PM
  #21  
Disabled Account
Banned
 
Disabled Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
Why not drop the Final drive Phil? Its a great great mod
As above Phil........I went to 3.9 step-off and rear diff on my road/trackday Saph and will be doing the same to the Es Cos.......TOTALLY transforms the car (especially if you are running 18's).....you then realise how "silly" tall geared our Cossie's are with the standard final drive (3.6)......and 5th becomes a gear that is now usefull (i.e. not just for motorway cruising)
Old 08-11-2005, 04:41 PM
  #22  
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Porkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

keeps you on boost more, gears are closer, car feels punchier and much more usable. I really can't see any downside.

It also gives your gearbox an easier life

TOP TOP TOP mod

I NEVER used 5th on track... and hardly touched 4th before I changed to 3.9 drive.

Now I have a 5 speed box insted of a 3 speed!
Old 08-11-2005, 04:43 PM
  #23  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah but Mike i think my spec now just stage 3 is lovely with all that grip....so all i'd be doin is upping the torque...ok it will suddenly drop off but only to what it is now....its just that shove from corners that a 40psi sike wouyld do nicely..LOL...remember i can do this to the current engine allowing the other engine to be big power
Old 08-11-2005, 04:43 PM
  #24  
ian sibbert
Advanced PassionFord User
 
ian sibbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lancaster, Lancs
Posts: 1,859
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

11:1 and even higher on the focus enignes....I only wish we could run unrestricted....might have a chance against a 6R4 latest grp'a' cars with a T34 runs about 310 with approx 600 lbs/ft of torque....2.5 bar of boost....there is alot to consider in the specs when you look at grp'a' rally engines, wrc engines and good track car engines.....they are massively different....
Old 08-11-2005, 04:44 PM
  #25  
Spiky
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Spiky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bosch-Man


i got a 3.9 rear diff for an esc cos here if ya need one
Old 08-11-2005, 04:46 PM
  #26  
NUTS RuS
15K+ Super Poster!!
iTrader: (35)
 
NUTS RuS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vimto Land Nr Warrington, Cheshire
Posts: 15,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rally engines make USELESS road car engines.

Why on earth would anyone want one in a road car ??

It would need rebuilding every 1000 miles
Old 08-11-2005, 04:47 PM
  #27  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

stage three,,, new final drive and step of gears would be an amazing road car
Old 08-11-2005, 04:48 PM
  #28  
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Porkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Totally agree Gareth

Also a stunning and usable track car, HUGE fun, very fast without being a big budget, scary power, silly running costs monster.
Old 08-11-2005, 04:48 PM
  #29  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Why would it need rebuilding every 1000 miles then? Your only giving it the torque level of a 500bhp motor and dont they go for 20k plus miles?
Old 08-11-2005, 04:50 PM
  #30  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Phil,
I can only advise you not to do it, at the end of the day it is down to you.

I used to run a 34psi spike and hold only 26psi - my car would eat a T3/4 every 3 months . Pushing a T3/4 to 40psi is asking for trouble IMO. Don't forget that even the Grp A turbos were running maram shafts etc, and the WRC cars were running IHIs that are Ł6k a pop .

300bhp in an Escort feels slow as fuck . I'm telling you now, you WILL regret it .
Old 08-11-2005, 04:50 PM
  #31  
ian sibbert
Advanced PassionFord User
 
ian sibbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lancaster, Lancs
Posts: 1,859
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Tony is right in effect as the parts in a rally engine are 'lifed'....
Old 08-11-2005, 04:50 PM
  #32  
Disabled Account
Banned
 
Disabled Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
Totally agree Gareth
We ALL agree - BUT Phil's not taking any notice
Old 08-11-2005, 04:51 PM
  #33  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

...whats step off gears?

So an Escos std is 0-60 in 5.8 secs for large turbo what would a:-

320bhp stage 3 do 0-60

and

320bhp with monte torque say 500ft lb do 0-60

with this 3.9 rear diff on

In your opinion?
Old 08-11-2005, 04:53 PM
  #34  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The gearbox / diffs would explode first .
Old 08-11-2005, 04:53 PM
  #35  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
Mike...nope i want a full rally type spec well as close as the grp a cars....does the restrictor get you the torque?

Come on pf give me your knowledge

I want 0-60 in 3 secs in the wet and whatever a rally car goes top end!

Transmission aint an issue will all be sorted.
you need a MUCH higher CR, the restrictor doesnt help with torque, it merely limits BHP, so if you take it out you have the same torque low down but more BHP up top.
Old 08-11-2005, 04:55 PM
  #36  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
Mike...nope i want a full rally type spec well as close as the grp a cars....does the restrictor get you the torque?

Come on pf give me your knowledge

I want 0-60 in 3 secs in the wet and whatever a rally car goes top end!

Transmission aint an issue will all be sorted.
you need a MUCH higher CR, the restrictor doesnt help with torque, it merely limits BHP, so if you take it out you have the same torque low down but more BHP up top.
And a melted engine, as the restrictor means single figure boost by 7k, which ALLOWS this high compression. Without the restrictor the boost would have to be backed off or forced to have the same boost curve as you have with the restrictor with air injectors.
Old 08-11-2005, 04:57 PM
  #37  
ian sibbert
Advanced PassionFord User
 
ian sibbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lancaster, Lancs
Posts: 1,859
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
The gearbox / diffs would explode first .


In my experience even an R&D gearbox cant take lots of torque for long....youd need a minimum of an FFD or X-trac transmission to acheive wot ur after....
Old 08-11-2005, 04:57 PM
  #38  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

what do you care about times phil,, your never going too have it timed

ive been in a few cars equipted with 3.9 final drives and they drive very very well

i do plan one day to have a go at 4.4 final drive in my car

you need step of gears for your transfer box because you cant really change the final drive ratio of the front diff so you do it in the transfer case
Old 08-11-2005, 04:58 PM
  #39  
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Porkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Step off gears and chain are what make the front diff a 3.9 ratio mate. You just need to change the CWP at the back.... OR buy Spikys
Old 08-11-2005, 04:58 PM
  #40  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mike your such a killjoy......do you tell your kid stuff like that..."DONT peddle to fast or you WILL snap the chain due to too much force thru a weak link"

Just answer the question assuming its been beefed up Anyway i thought Grp N cars were nearly std was they just std torque too?


Quick Reply: My Engine specs...please help!



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 AM.