Pro`s and Con`s of low comp
#1
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: berkshire
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
rebuilding my engine in the very near future and was wondering about whether or not to got for low compression pistons?possibly a set of these:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-COSWORTH-W...QQcmdZViewItem
i assume i can still run standard cams with these aswell?
any help or advice appreciated.cheers in advance
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-COSWORTH-W...QQcmdZViewItem
i assume i can still run standard cams with these aswell?
any help or advice appreciated.cheers in advance
![Big Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
#3
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
...really depends on your mapper.
I personally only ever run 7.8-1 minimum whatever BHP i aim for..tried lower but drivability suffers...but then mine is only a road car..i guess if your tracking it lo comp is the answer....but not 6.9-1 low
Yes you can still run std cams with those pistons..but by the looks of the cutouts you could run 14's,16's...
I personally only ever run 7.8-1 minimum whatever BHP i aim for..tried lower but drivability suffers...but then mine is only a road car..i guess if your tracking it lo comp is the answer....but not 6.9-1 low
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
![Big Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Yes you can still run std cams with those pistons..but by the looks of the cutouts you could run 14's,16's...
#4
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
...really depends on your mapper.
I personally only ever run 7.8-1 minimum whatever BHP i aim for..tried lower but drivability suffers...but then mine is only a road car..i guess if your tracking it lo comp is the answer....but not 6.9-1 low
Yes you can still run std cams with those pistons..but by the looks of the cutouts you could run 14's,16's...
I personally only ever run 7.8-1 minimum whatever BHP i aim for..tried lower but drivability suffers...but then mine is only a road car..i guess if your tracking it lo comp is the answer....but not 6.9-1 low
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
![Big Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Yes you can still run std cams with those pistons..but by the looks of the cutouts you could run 14's,16's...
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
#6
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: berkshire
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
prob going for stage 3.they will be going in a 4x4 engine so it will be 7.5/1 CR.will a lower compression ratio cause more turbo lag or worse throttle response or any other detrimental effects?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PRO-LINE MOTORSPORT
General Car Related Discussion.
5
28-09-2015 09:54 PM