To get BIG BHP on low boost...
11-04-2005, 08:54 PM
#41
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steve...i say Neils head was the problem......what do YOU say?
Please educate me..as you are the Guru
I am worried about my one as it wernt done by a Cossie specialist.
Please educate me..as you are the Guru
I am worried about my one as it wernt done by a Cossie specialist.
11-04-2005, 09:11 PM
#42
DEYTUKURJERBS
Neils head isnt a problem, deliberate, look how good his powerband is.
Small port maybe, relativley mild cams maybe, but on purpose, to give the car a good powerband.
Huge ports and wilder cams wouldve gave the same power at less boost, but shite powerband.
IMHO you go for as mild a cam and small a port as possible for the power you want, providing you spec the compression etc to take the boost needed, thats the way for a nice engine.
Small port maybe, relativley mild cams maybe, but on purpose, to give the car a good powerband.
Huge ports and wilder cams wouldve gave the same power at less boost, but shite powerband.
IMHO you go for as mild a cam and small a port as possible for the power you want, providing you spec the compression etc to take the boost needed, thats the way for a nice engine.
11-04-2005, 09:18 PM
#43
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here you go Phil and old PF thread for you to look at. 
Tuned by SIMON NORRIS @ Norris designs.
632 bhp YB ONLY 2.0 litres running NO MORE than 2.0 bar at ANY time.
Tuned on the same engine dyno that MAD use.
https://passionford.com/forum/viewto...er=asc&start=0
Tuned by SIMON NORRIS @ Norris designs.
632 bhp YB ONLY 2.0 litres running NO MORE than 2.0 bar at ANY time.
Tuned on the same engine dyno that MAD use.
https://passionford.com/forum/viewto...er=asc&start=0
11-04-2005, 09:44 PM
#48
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chimp...i keep fooking saying..I KNOW FUCK ALL ABOUT ANY ENGINE.
I am really dense as you say/know i am...hence the daft questions...do you think i care
We cant all be guru's who were born with engine knowledge.
I am really dense as you say/know i am...hence the daft questions...do you think i care
We cant all be guru's who were born with engine knowledge.
11-04-2005, 09:46 PM
#49
Phil, you switch between one minute claiming you are designing this revolutionary new engine thats going to turn the tuning world on its head, and then the next minute you dont even know the basics, its all a bit jekyl and hyde dont you think?
11-04-2005, 09:48 PM
#50
DEYTUKURJERBS
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Phil, you switch between one minute claiming you are designing this revolutionary new engine thats going to turn the tuning world on its head, and then the next minute you dont even know the basics, its all a bit jekyl and hyde dont you think?
karl used to say somthing a lot which is 100% true quite a bit...
engines need to be specced as a whole, picking bits from various engine specs doesnt make a good engine
11-04-2005, 09:54 PM
#51
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have never claimed shit
Hence all the questions... i thought you knew,as you are intelligent aint you? ...I take many peoples advice and make my own descision...i admit i have mucho experience of what works and dont on a YB thru experience and not theory...but i still dont know shit......like you Chip...you claim to known alot when you dont know much about the YB..we are very much alike..except i actually have a YB and many things and not just just a Repmobile..i actually beleive you have nothing!
Hence all the questions... i thought you knew,as you are intelligent aint you?
...I take many peoples advice and make my own descision...i admit i have mucho experience of what works and dont on a YB thru experience and not theory...but i still dont know shit......like you Chip...you claim to known alot when you dont know much about the YB..we are very much alike..except i actually have a YB and many things and not just just a Repmobile..i actually beleive you have nothing!
11-04-2005, 09:56 PM
#52
Originally Posted by Itsmeagain
karl used to say somthing a lot which is 100% true quite a bit...
engines need to be specced as a whole, picking bits from various engine specs doesnt make a good engine
11-04-2005, 10:33 PM
#53
Norris Motorsport
Phil,
Neils engine has a very high flow head but has mild cams timed in for midrange response to give a power band that is as useable as possible. The big issue with making top end power for Neil is the 2wd manifold and PJ intermediate wastgate pipe (good strong piece of kit but not ideal for high rpm power) so going for Neils setup is ideal if you are keeping with the 2wd manifold as Neil has done.
Neils engine has a very high flow head but has mild cams timed in for midrange response to give a power band that is as useable as possible. The big issue with making top end power for Neil is the 2wd manifold and PJ intermediate wastgate pipe (good strong piece of kit but not ideal for high rpm power) so going for Neils setup is ideal if you are keeping with the 2wd manifold as Neil has done.
11-04-2005, 11:05 PM
#55
Phil, you can see most of my current cars here, if you "believe i have nothing"
https://passionford.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=114356
If you are into any doubt as to wether any of those vehicles are mine then let me know which one and ill point you at proof of it.
https://passionford.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=114356
If you are into any doubt as to wether any of those vehicles are mine then let me know which one and ill point you at proof of it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Indyrs
General Car Related Discussion.
8
04-12-2022 12:39 PM