General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

GT3076R vs GT3071R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28-07-2013, 04:18 PM
  #1  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default GT3076R vs GT3071R

I have turned of my GT3076R today, because my wastegate is blown away..

Now im thinking to change against the 3071 to get a better response,
so at the moment i need nearly 4000 rpm to get the full power.

But i dont know if the difference is big enough to justify buying a new Turbo?

Has anyone experience to the tell me how much rpm difference is between
these turbos to get full boost?
Old 28-07-2013, 04:28 PM
  #2  
crazycage
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
crazycage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: merseyside
Posts: 4,995
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I would swap to a borgwarner efr 7064, would mean a new manifold tho
Old 28-07-2013, 06:20 PM
  #3  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have never seen a Cosworth with Borgwarner Turbo..
Old 28-07-2013, 06:41 PM
  #4  
Sonic Boom
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Sonic Boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Solihull near Birmingham
Posts: 5,640
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brocker
I have never seen a Cosworth with Borgwarner Turbo..
They are abit few and far between Rod's got one fitted to his.

As for the original question how much power do you want to make?

Rich
Old 28-07-2013, 06:55 PM
  #5  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brocker
I have never seen a Cosworth with Borgwarner Turbo..
There are more than a few, Full boost 3400rpm and 500ftlb at 3800rpm on a RR.

Mark
Old 28-07-2013, 07:18 PM
  #6  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have 420hp on my gt3076r, and i would like to have the same power but with better response..

I heard some good things about the borgwarner, but i never see one in germany on a cosworth and have no idea which modification, changes are necessary to fit them..

I know it was some work to fit the gt3076r, i had to make a other oil return, other water connections and oil inlet..
Old 28-07-2013, 07:45 PM
  #7  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I would simply swap to a 3071 or the billet variant as it will be a direct swap
Old 28-07-2013, 08:57 PM
  #8  
Sonic Boom
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Sonic Boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Solihull near Birmingham
Posts: 5,640
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

As Jonny says strap on a GTX3071 you'll get a better responce and keep the power level you want.
Rich
Old 28-07-2013, 09:17 PM
  #9  
Canada1
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Canada1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 789
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

What turbine housing does your GT3076R have on it?
The turbine (or hotside) is what will determine spool characteristics.

The GT3076R could be ordered with .63, .82, and 1.06 AR turbine housings.
The 1.06 being way too big IMO.
Old 28-07-2013, 10:09 PM
  #10  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have the .72 Cosworth Style housing.. Before them i had a .63 but it was to smal, the boost goes up to more the 2 BAR with full opened Wastegate
Old 28-07-2013, 10:14 PM
  #11  
Fast Guy
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Fast Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 1,529
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brocker
I have 420hp on my gt3076r, and i would like to have the same power but with better response..
What boost are you running? That's quite low power for a gt3076r and easily achievable on a gt3071r.
Old 28-07-2013, 10:29 PM
  #12  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had 420hp at 1,5 Bar, but drove 1,7-1,8 most time.. My Engine is allmost standart,
thats the reason for little less power
Old 29-07-2013, 06:20 AM
  #13  
BRAMMER
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (23)
 
BRAMMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The North
Posts: 9,665
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I've got an internal gated GT3076r and this is how mine works, mines not a standard engine

Name:  RollingroadD900JKLGT30pb_zpsf669f8fd.jpg
Views: 819
Size:  80.9 KB
Old 29-07-2013, 06:44 AM
  #14  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I havent a Dynosheet of my car, but i was on enginedyno and had 420HP there.

At the moment im thinking about to change to a 3071 or a Borgwarner, but i dont know the difference at responce and have no idea how tedious it is to mount the borgwarner.

Or i repair my 3076 and swap in the winterbreak..??

Your car revs up to 8.000 rpm??
Old 29-07-2013, 08:05 AM
  #15  
rsmark86
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (3)
 
rsmark86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bracknell
Posts: 5,686
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

My old engine made full boost faster than yours with a gt35r .82

But I had fully ported head and cams specc'd to suit the turbo, I honestly think that is what your missing

A cosworth head becomes very restrictive at the power level you are at and you really need at least a inlet cam change, and a decent inlet of some sort


Also what ecu are you running and is it a live mapped car or a chipped standard ecu, all these things will matter at that power
Old 29-07-2013, 08:24 AM
  #16  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a Live mapped L8.
Old 29-07-2013, 11:27 AM
  #17  
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
 
scoooby slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: st neots cambridgeshire
Posts: 10,211
Received 415 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsmark86
My old engine made full boost faster than yours with a gt35r .82

But I had fully ported head and cams specc'd to suit the turbo, I honestly think that is what your missing

A cosworth head becomes very restrictive at the power level you are at and you really need at least a inlet cam change, and a decent inlet of some sort


Also what ecu are you running and is it a live mapped car or a chipped standard ecu, all these things will matter at that power

are you saying you had a gt35 on a 2.0 yb making full boost before 4000 rpm ?
Old 29-07-2013, 11:34 AM
  #18  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

GT30..

I never say something about a GT35
Old 29-07-2013, 02:00 PM
  #19  
BRAMMER
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (23)
 
BRAMMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The North
Posts: 9,665
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brocker

Your car revs up to 8.000 rpm??
8200 so i believe

Originally Posted by rsmark86
My old engine made full boost faster than yours with a gt35r .82

But I had fully ported head and cams specc'd to suit the turbo, I honestly think that is what your missing

A cosworth head becomes very restrictive at the power level you are at and you really need at least a inlet cam change, and a decent inlet of some sort


Also what ecu are you running and is it a live mapped car or a chipped standard ecu, all these things will matter at that power
Mark are you commenting on my car or Brockers?

Originally Posted by scoooby slayer
are you saying you had a gt35 on a 2.0 yb making full boost before 4000 rpm ?
Originally Posted by Brocker
GT30..

I never say something about a GT35
scoooby slayer is referring to Marks comment
Old 29-07-2013, 02:04 PM
  #20  
cossiedave
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
cossiedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in me garage working on the cossie
Posts: 1,735
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brocker
I have never seen a Cosworth with Borgwarner Turbo..
Where you been to there's a few on cossies now and work well
Old 29-07-2013, 02:29 PM
  #21  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I heard only here from cossis with borgwarner, but i didnt find a lot about it, specialy how to fit etc.

In germany i never heard about a cossi with borgwarner..
Old 29-07-2013, 03:18 PM
  #22  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If the EFR makes a big difference at the responce i could thinking about a swap in Winter, but then i need more Infos about them and how to fit..

At saturday i was on the Nordschleife, my setup feels well at the road, but at the racetrack its not funny to wait for the power after the corners.. Here is a Video from Saturday, but i didnt drive attaking because it was really hot, i had 130°C Oiltemp and didnt drive the track for 2-3 years..


Old 29-07-2013, 03:43 PM
  #23  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Or will be the EFR 7163 a better option?
Attached Thumbnails GT3076R vs GT3071R-efr7163vs706417bar.jpg  
Old 29-07-2013, 04:40 PM
  #24  
LHD220Turbo
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
 
LHD220Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: swindon, wiltshire
Posts: 10,654
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Mark Shead has done a few YB's with the BW turbo's. From what i can gather you'd be mad to consider anything but a BW.

They are not cheap but worth it for the better repsonse/ spool. unsure what is required to fit the BW, but i believe they do a internally gated one.

hopefully someone who's got a BW fitted can answer your questions
Old 29-07-2013, 04:52 PM
  #25  
Gazzonator
Gary Krishna
iTrader: (9)
 
Gazzonator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire.
Posts: 4,029
Received 66 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

I've got a GT3076.82 on my saph at the moment which isn't running yet but from what I've been hearing about these Borg-Warner turbos, I'm quite tempted to have a go with one of those instead.
Old 29-07-2013, 04:59 PM
  #26  
BRAMMER
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (23)
 
BRAMMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The North
Posts: 9,665
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I'm sure someone said your looking at Ł4k+ to get one fitted and running which is a big difference

Here's one of Justins graphs for his

Name:  B88A5603-D046-4782-A459-4D1CF5540154-627-0000004C6F918469_zpsb303badf.jpg
Views: 752
Size:  77.3 KB
Old 29-07-2013, 05:20 PM
  #27  
Canada1
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Canada1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 789
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Hello Brocker,

You have full boost by 4000 rpm. That doesn't seem too out of line for a 400+ HP 2 liter engine.
Did you want full boost by 3000 or lower rpm?
I am not sure full boost by 3000 rpm on a 400+ HP 2 liter is possible?
Maybe someone else can comment.
Old 29-07-2013, 05:28 PM
  #28  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

TBH I cannot see why if you already have a very good setup you would want to change ? Even more so if you haven't even finished getting your current setup working ?!

There is no denying that the BW appears to be a great turbo but its not exactly a direct fit so costs a lot and I really do feel people under estimate the real world performance you can get from a GT or GTX turbo, more power than most can handle and probably more torque than your transmission can take anyway
Old 29-07-2013, 06:19 PM
  #29  
Sonic Boom
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Sonic Boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Solihull near Birmingham
Posts: 5,640
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonnyBravo
TBH I cannot see why if you already have a very good setup you would want to change ? Even more so if you haven't even finished getting your current setup working ?!

There is no denying that the BW appears to be a great turbo but its not exactly a direct fit so costs a lot and I really do feel people under estimate the real world performance you can get from a GT or GTX turbo, more power than most can handle and probably more torque than your transmission can take anyway
I really like my GTX3076 it produces 590bhp and 578 ft/lb of torque, if I had the money i'd like to fit a BW but as said it's the best part of 4 grand with the cost of the turbo, twin scroll manifold and two external wastegates.

Cost wise i'd stick with what you have or maybe down size to a GTX3071 to give you better spool up.

Rich
Old 29-07-2013, 06:30 PM
  #30  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sonic Boom
I really like my GTX3076 it produces 590bhp and 578 ft/lb of torque, if I had the money i'd like to fit a BW but as said it's the best part of 4 grand with the cost of the turbo, twin scroll manifold and two external wastegates.

Cost wise i'd stick with what you have or maybe down size to a GTX3071 to give you better spool up.

Rich
Using a internal gated EFR would take 30% off that cost.

Mark
Old 29-07-2013, 06:32 PM
  #31  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BRAMMER
I'm sure someone said your looking at Ł4k+ to get one fitted and running which is a big difference

Here's one of Justins graphs for his

There is a good graph of a 7064 making 521hp and 535ftlb on the Escort site.
It makes 500ftlb at 3800rpm.

Mark
Old 29-07-2013, 06:45 PM
  #32  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I dont know how you reach 4K..

The BW cost only a little more than the GT, i looked for the
EFR7064 with twinscroll and internal WG, bevause i heard the twinscroll spools better
and i would prefer a internal WG. The only negative i see at this setup is the .92AR what could be to big
for good responce?

With T3 manifold its a .83AR, its still bigger then my GT with .72AR, no idea if its still better for the responce?

Ok, i will need a other manifold, no idea how much this cost, i never looked for one,
but i dont know if something else is needed?

Im quit happy with my power, ok maybe i will raise it up to high 400hp
later, but i would like to have better responce with the same power level..

Last edited by Brocker; 29-07-2013 at 06:49 PM.
Old 29-07-2013, 06:52 PM
  #33  
Gazzonator
Gary Krishna
iTrader: (9)
 
Gazzonator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire.
Posts: 4,029
Received 66 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

How would a GTX3071 compare to a GT3076? What's the benefits over the latter?
Old 29-07-2013, 07:09 PM
  #34  
Brocker
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If i read the compressor maps correct, the GTX should have a worser responce as the GT
Old 29-07-2013, 07:16 PM
  #35  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brocker
I dont know how you reach 4K..

The BW cost only a little more than the GT, i looked for the
EFR7064 with twinscroll and internal WG, bevause i heard the twinscroll spools better
and i would prefer a internal WG. The only negative i see at this setup is the .92AR what could be to big
for good responce?

With T3 manifold its a .83AR, its still bigger then my GT with .72AR, no idea if its still better for the responce?

Ok, i will need a other manifold, no idea how much this cost, i never looked for one,
but i dont know if something else is needed?

Im quit happy with my power, ok maybe i will raise it up to high 400hp
later, but i would like to have better responce with the same power level..
Forget about the size diff on twin scroll, The .92 on the internal gate is a bit on the small side,
You have to add the cost of a manifold as well as the turbo.

Mark
Old 29-07-2013, 07:18 PM
  #36  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brocker
If i read the compressor maps correct, the GTX should have a worser responce as the GT
The GTX is a worse turbo than the GT3071/76.

Mark
Old 29-07-2013, 10:12 PM
  #37  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

What makes you say that Mark ? is this engine specific as the one my mate has on a 2.5l Skyline is very impressive.
Old 30-07-2013, 06:58 AM
  #38  
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
 
scoooby slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: st neots cambridgeshire
Posts: 10,211
Received 415 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonnyBravo
What makes you say that Mark ? is this engine specific as the one my mate has on a 2.5l Skyline is very impressive.
I think mark just means response mate, ive not had a gtx yet only a gt but ive read a lot that the gtx versions make more power but always at the cost of response.
and the op seems to be looking for response mainly.
Old 30-07-2013, 09:54 AM
  #39  
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
J1mbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JonnyBravo
What makes you say that Mark ? is this engine specific as the one my mate has on a 2.5l Skyline is very impressive.
On a yb they are pretty aweful, surge badly and don't come on particularly amazing.
Old 30-07-2013, 09:56 AM
  #40  
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
J1mbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BRAMMER
8200 so i believe



Mark are you commenting on my car or Brockers?





scoooby slayer is referring to Marks comment
I would be seriously considering dropping that rev limit. At 7850 we have had lifters pump up and clip valves I don't even take my own engine to an 8200 rev limit on long rods, cps and solid lifters


Quick Reply: GT3076R vs GT3071R



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.