General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

FAO tuners & engine builders or anyone in the know.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25-09-2012, 06:01 PM
  #1  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default FAO tuners & engine builders or anyone in the know.

Basically I want your views and opinions on how and what's needed to run a low lagg turbo to 44psi or more... And what engine and components to use or need so the air consumed is used.... As I'm wanting to build/ have built a engine to this spec.... Any help or advise please.
Old 25-09-2012, 06:05 PM
  #2  
JamesH
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (21)
 
JamesH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: .
Posts: 10,807
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

What engine and turbo will probably help
Old 25-09-2012, 06:31 PM
  #3  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,945
Received 259 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

A rather random way to spec an engine....I want to run 44psi ?

Now that is just weird. Is there any reasoning behind it ?

Engine internals or spec is less of an issue than fuel used, intercooling, turbocharger and of course ecu tuning etc etc
Head gasket sealing will need well taken care of as well. And the usage of the engine will matter. Is it for short blasts, or do you want to run at full throttle all day ?

But crank, rods, pistons etc hardly matter as long as they are good quality.
Old 25-09-2012, 06:37 PM
  #4  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JamesH
What engine and turbo will probably help

That's what I'm asking mate.
Old 25-09-2012, 06:38 PM
  #5  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
A rather random way to spec an engine....I want to run 44psi ?

Now that is just weird. Is there any reasoning behind it ?

Engine internals or spec is less of an issue than fuel used, intercooling, turbocharger and of course ecu tuning etc etc
Head gasket sealing will need well taken care of as well. And the usage of the engine will matter. Is it for short blasts, or do you want to run at full throttle all day ?

But crank, rods, pistons etc hardly matter as long as they are good quality.

Car will only be occasionally run as its for my 3dr.

For the odd blast... I just want to build or have built a very high boost low lag engine.

Last edited by Rsmat; 25-09-2012 at 06:39 PM.
Old 25-09-2012, 06:40 PM
  #6  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,945
Received 259 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_matt
That's what I'm asking mate.
Didnt sound like it ?

Why not state what you intend to use the car for, what sort of power/torque you want to achieve, what sort of budget you have. Is it purely for racing, or road use ? Will you be using race fuel, or pump fuel ?

Asking to spec an engine for 44psi boost is just weird.
Old 25-09-2012, 06:48 PM
  #7  
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 7,707
Received 237 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

44psi is 3bar.
Ran 2.9bar on my MAD 500bhp engine using a t4 back in 1743. Think mine runs 2.8bar on a GTX4202 so either of those could be tadded up to 3 bar im sure think i also ran 2.9 bar on a GT4094 & A GT4210 so lots of choice there now if only you would drop the criteria of low lag . As a matter of interest we ran 4bar down Brunters & it made a bloody mess of the head gasket when the waste gate pipe came off.
Old 25-09-2012, 06:57 PM
  #8  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Didnt sound like it ?

Why not state what you intend to use the car for, what sort of power/torque you want to achieve, what sort of budget you have. Is it purely for racing, or road use ? Will you be using race fuel, or pump fuel ?

Asking to spec an engine for 44psi boost is just weird.

Oh right I thought the bit that said what's needed covered that...

It will be pump fuel and for my pleasure only on the road.

Why is it wierd... Everyone wants something including yourself so are you wierd aswell ?... Sorry it's probably me as I am confusing lol...

ROD I don't want lagg full stop mate... If you could have your turbo coming in a little lower you probably would right..?

Rod do you mind telling me your full spec that you had at 500 please mate.
Old 25-09-2012, 07:09 PM
  #9  
Steve Cooper
PassionFord Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: essex
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RS_matt
Oh right I thought the bit that said what's needed covered that...

It will be pump fuel and for my pleasure only on the road.

Why is it wierd... Everyone wants something including yourself so are you wierd aswell ?... Sorry it's probably me as I am confusing lol...

ROD I don't want lagg full stop mate... If you could have your turbo coming in a little lower you probably would right..?

Rod do you mind telling me your full spec that you had at 500 please mate.
it is a little strange, why not just get it built to perform at the level you want? if it makes the power you are looking for with no lag what difference does it make if your running 1 bar or 3 bar?
Old 25-09-2012, 07:17 PM
  #10  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Cooper
it is a little strange, why not just get it built to perform at the level you want? if it makes the power you are looking for with no lag what difference does it make if your running 1 bar or 3 bar?

I'm not going to chase power all im wanting is 44psi or more a turbo that will at least half last out and a engine that will take and consume the air... I couldnt care if I only got 300bhp and 400ftlb... It's not about that for me it's about boost.

Last edited by Rsmat; 25-09-2012 at 07:18 PM.
Old 25-09-2012, 07:23 PM
  #11  
Big Will_
Borg Warner EFR Equipped!
 
Big Will_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the unit, building a 450bhp Time Attack Focus!
Posts: 5,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Matt,

Boost pressure is a measure of restriction in the engine, for example, if you ported the cylinder head on an engine that was running 34psi and changed nothing else, then I would expect that engine to be running maybe 28psi afterwards as it would flow better.

Turbochargers have an efficiency range where the air they are compressing comes out efficiently, i.e a large quantity of air at a given temperature. When the turbocharger exceeds this efficiency range, the air coming out is significantly hotter and cannot be regulated as well by your intercooler. You tend to find that bigger turbos need to run higher boost pressures to enter this efficiency window, i.e a T3 turbo is efficient between 14psi and 20psi, yet a GT42R is efficient between 38psi and 48psi (for example).

Saying that you want a small turbo to run massive boost pressures will probably not actually result in a faster car. Running a T34 at 44psi will generate very high air charge temperatures, the resulting reduction in oxygen content will limit the power production and on the dyno, it will most likely not give you a gain in power.

Your peak cylinder pressures will however increase significantly, especially around peak torque, this is more likely to highlight weaknesses in head gasket integrity.

In summary mate, the key to making your car faster is to increase the engine efficiency rather than just the boost pressure
Old 25-09-2012, 07:27 PM
  #12  
fraser9764
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (3)
 
fraser9764's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,070
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

What do you want a specific boost level? That is weird.
What is it you actually want? Power, torque, a massive kick in the back when it comes on boost?.
What's this about an engine that can consume the air? What air? You realise that there is a massive difference in air flow between a t3 at 44 psi and a GT40 at 44psi?
Old 25-09-2012, 07:37 PM
  #13  
Turbosystems
Super Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
Turbosystems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: home
Posts: 12,849
Received 50 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fraser9764
What do you want a specific boost level? That is weird.
What is it you actually want? Power, torque, a massive kick in the back when it comes on boost?.
What's this about an engine that can consume the air? What air? You realise that there is a massive difference in air flow between a t3 at 44 psi and a GT40 at 44psi?
fookin train drivers
compound charging is what you require
or a viper 8.3 litre v10 twin turbo you might want to forget the 44 psi of boost though

Last edited by Turbosystems; 25-09-2012 at 07:41 PM.
Old 25-09-2012, 07:40 PM
  #14  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Big Will_
Matt,

Boost pressure is a measure of restriction in the engine, for example, if you ported the cylinder head on an engine that was running 34psi and changed nothing else, then I would expect that engine to be running maybe 28psi afterwards as it would flow better.

Turbochargers have an efficiency range where the air they are compressing comes out efficiently, i.e a large quantity of air at a given temperature. When the turbocharger exceeds this efficiency range, the air coming out is significantly hotter and cannot be regulated as well by your intercooler. You tend to find that bigger turbos need to run higher boost pressures to enter this efficiency window, i.e a T3 turbo is efficient between 14psi and 20psi, yet a GT42R is efficient between 38psi and 48psi (for example).

Saying that you want a small turbo to run massive boost pressures will probably not actually result in a faster car. Running a T34 at 44psi will generate very high air charge temperatures, the resulting reduction in oxygen content will limit the power production and on the dyno, it will most likely not give you a gain in power.

Your peak cylinder pressures will however increase significantly, especially around peak torque, this is more likely to highlight weaknesses in head gasket integrity.

In summary mate, the key to making your car faster is to increase the engine efficiency rather than just the boost pressure

Cheers will that's cleared a lot up for me....

Originally Posted by fraser9764
What do you want a specific boost level? That is weird.
What is it you actually want? Power, torque, a massive kick in the back when it comes on boost?.
What's this about an engine that can consume the air? What air? You realise that there is a massive difference in air flow between a t3 at 44 psi and a GT40 at 44psi?

I wanted 44psi just wanted more boost for a lot more kick....

The reason I put consume is because mine surged at 38psi but didn't at 36.. So at 38 wasn't the engine not consuming the air ? Choking etc..?
Old 25-09-2012, 07:42 PM
  #15  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosystems
fookin train drivers
compound charging is what you require
or a viper 8.3 litre v10 twin turbo you might want to forget the 44 psi of boost though


How about a billet wheel and 55 housing and more booost and a new engine lol...
Old 25-09-2012, 07:43 PM
  #16  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I'm confused aswell. Strangest engine critiria I've heard.
Old 25-09-2012, 07:44 PM
  #17  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I see your struggling with surge, and what it is. MANY on here have the wrong idea as I found out on a recent thread.
Old 25-09-2012, 07:47 PM
  #18  
Big Will_
Borg Warner EFR Equipped!
 
Big Will_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the unit, building a 450bhp Time Attack Focus!
Posts: 5,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Matt, if it was surging, then that is the turbo producing more air than the engine can consume. The boost pressure backs up and opposes the rotation of the compressor wheel, as a result you get a torsional loading on the shaft which can cause failure.

The reason you can achieve a big 'spike' as a peak boost and then see a reduction through the engine speed range is the efficiency change. At 4000rpm the engine is less efficient than at 6000rpm, the increase in efficiency at higher engine speeds means the boost is consumed by the engine which reduces the boost pressure seen in the plenum.
Old 25-09-2012, 07:52 PM
  #19  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I hate the term the turbo is producing air that the engine can't consume. Surely that would just raise inlet pressure? (if under the stall line I add)
It's the turbine not producing enough torque
Old 25-09-2012, 07:55 PM
  #20  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
I'm confused aswell. Strangest engine critiria I've heard.
You know me Gareth I'm wierd as Fook....

Originally Posted by GARETH T
I see your struggling with surge, and what it is. MANY on here have the wrong idea as I found out on a recent thread.
I read it mate...and I'm still thick...

Originally Posted by Big Will_
Matt, if it was surging, then that is the turbo producing more air than the engine can consume. The boost pressure backs up and opposes the rotation of the compressor wheel, as a result you get a torsional loading on the shaft which can cause failure.

The reason you can achieve a big 'spike' as a peak boost and then see a reduction through the engine speed range is the efficiency change. At 4000rpm the engine is less efficient than at 6000rpm, the increase in efficiency at higher engine speeds means the boost is consumed by the engine which reduces the boost pressure seen in the plenum.
I see so is it impossible to get a good 44psi boost spike our of a new turbo engine setup ?
Old 25-09-2012, 07:58 PM
  #21  
Big Will_
Borg Warner EFR Equipped!
 
Big Will_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the unit, building a 450bhp Time Attack Focus!
Posts: 5,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
I hate the term the turbo is producing air that the engine can't consume. Surely that would just raise inlet pressure? (if under the stall line I add)
It's the turbine not producing enough torque
Yes, but if the compressor wheel rotation wasn't being opposed by excessive pressure, the turbine wouldn't need greater torque to rotate it...

If the engine efficiency was high enough to consume the given boost, then that resistance wouldn't be encountered, so surge can be reduced by reducing the target boost pressure at that given engine speed condition or by increasing the intake swallowing.
Old 25-09-2012, 08:01 PM
  #22  
Big Will_
Borg Warner EFR Equipped!
 
Big Will_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the unit, building a 450bhp Time Attack Focus!
Posts: 5,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_matt

I see so is it impossible to get a good 44psi boost spike our of a new turbo engine setup ?
It all depends what your target power figure is, what turbocharger you need to use to achieve that and whether there is anything beneficial to running such a boost spike...

You can get a 'kick in the back' without running huge spikes. Huge spikes have a nasty habit of finding the next weakest component in your engine or transmission!
Old 25-09-2012, 08:12 PM
  #23  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Big Will_
Yes, but if the compressor wheel rotation wasn't being opposed by excessive pressure, the turbine wouldn't need greater torque to rotate it...

If the engine efficiency was high enough to consume the given boost, then that resistance wouldn't be encountered, so surge can be reduced by reducing the target boost pressure at that given engine speed condition or by increasing the intake swallowing.
You are correct of cause, but people think its souly a compressor issue.
You could say if the turbine was slightly bigger it would produce enough torque and all will be fine. As you know there's a larger picture going on than most people think.
Old 25-09-2012, 08:15 PM
  #24  
Big Will_
Borg Warner EFR Equipped!
 
Big Will_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the unit, building a 450bhp Time Attack Focus!
Posts: 5,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
You are correct of cause, but people think its souly a compressor issue.
You could say if the turbine was slightly bigger it would produce enough torque and all will be fine. As you know there's a larger picture going on than most people think.
Yes mate. Sadly the common misconception is that the smallest turbine housing gives the fastest spool up and the biggest compressor wheel gives the best power. In fact, it creates a horribly mismatched turbo!

I think people now are starting to accept that a 0.82 AR exhaust housing is actually superior to a 0.63 AR on a GT3076 for example, its a shame that its taken this long for the internet to accept this fact!
Old 25-09-2012, 08:17 PM
  #25  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Big Will_
It all depends what your target power figure is, what turbocharger you need to use to achieve that and whether there is anything beneficial to running such a boost spike...

You can get a 'kick in the back' without running huge spikes. Huge spikes have a nasty habit of finding the next weakest component in your engine or transmission!


Well I've drawn myself to a blank because I'm not chasing power... I just wanted something different like lots of boost lol....maybe I should stick with what I have as it has a big kick at 36psi on a T34.48
Old 25-09-2012, 08:28 PM
  #26  
pani_k
PassionFORD Member
iTrader: (1)
 
pani_k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to try clear a bit of confusion, I think in your head you were going along the lines of running a relatively average sized turbo with plenty of low end punch and then winding it up to 40psi+ to achieve good power yet have little lag although it appears things don't work that way, or at least that's how I interpreted what you were asking.
Old 25-09-2012, 08:38 PM
  #27  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pani_k
Just to try clear a bit of confusion, I think in your head you were going along the lines of running a relatively average sized turbo with plenty of low end punch and then winding it up to 40psi+ to achieve good power yet have little lag although it appears things don't work that way, or at least that's how I interpreted what you were asking.


Bang on mate... Cheers
Old 25-09-2012, 08:40 PM
  #28  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Compressor effieciency would be shit mate!
Old 25-09-2012, 09:38 PM
  #29  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,945
Received 259 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
I hate the term the turbo is producing air that the engine can't consume. Surely that would just raise inlet pressure?
It will raise inlet pressure....except the same pressure still controls the wastegate so boost will remain as normal.

Other than that though, this thread HAS to be a wind up ?
Old 25-09-2012, 09:45 PM
  #30  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
It will raise inlet pressure....except the same pressure still controls the wastegate so boost will remain as normal.

Other than that though, this thread HAS to be a wind up ?

Why does it have to be a wind up... I'm dead seriouse... I was under the illusion that if I can run 36psi on literally a standard engine... Sure with a new uprated engine and different turbo I could run 44psi..!

So stop with all your technical shit I can't understand and keep it in thick mans terms so I can understand please...
Old 25-09-2012, 09:51 PM
  #31  
fraser9764
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (3)
 
fraser9764's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,070
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
It will raise inlet pressure....except the same pressure still controls the wastegate so boost will remain as normal.

Other than that though, this thread HAS to be a wind up ?
Another confusing statement
How can boost remain the same but inlet pressure rise? What is boost if it is not inlet pressure compared to atmospheric pressure.

Last edited by fraser9764; 25-09-2012 at 09:55 PM.
Old 25-09-2012, 09:56 PM
  #32  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,945
Received 259 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_matt
Why does it have to be a wind up... I'm dead seriouse... I was under the illusion that if I can run 36psi on literally a standard engine... Sure with a new uprated engine and different turbo I could run 44psi..!

So stop with all your technical shit I can't understand and keep it in thick mans terms so I can understand please...

OK. If you build an engine that is capable of running 44psi of boost reliably on standard pump fuel, it will be terrible low down, and I still doubt you'd ever trust it to be reliable.

Or a better way. You could build a 1000cc engine that runs 44psi and makes 400bhp.
Or you could build a 4000cc engine that makes 400bhp at 1psi. ( although obviously you'd never build a turbo setup to use 1psi )

Now which would be better ? Clearly the larger engine with no boost.

Boost is the last thing you want on any engine. In an ideal world you want to use the least amount of boost possible to make the most amount of power over the widest rpm range.
But as engine size is limited, we are forced to use things like turbochargers to make the extra power we want from those small engines.

So what you really want is a bigger capacity engine, a small-medium sized turbo running moderate boost and highish compression to give a very responsive setup with a wide spread of power.

You absolutely do not want to run 44psi.

Of course the other option and it would be more expensive, but give a wide spread of power and instant throttle response to feel like a larger engine. Supercharge it.
Old 25-09-2012, 10:19 PM
  #33  
v man
Zee Germans are coming
 
v man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: dunstable beds
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Fuck it mat

Wind it up

If it goes bang so what just build another

Well that's what I did in my series 2 many years ago and it was the best afternoons driving I've ever had

Old 25-09-2012, 10:20 PM
  #34  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,945
Received 259 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fraser9764
Another confusing statement
How can boost remain the same but inlet pressure rise? What is boost if it is not inlet pressure compared to atmospheric pressure.
Boost is never static. It is always rising/falling whether you can actually see it or not. That's why the wastegate is always varying it's opening. Again, it isnt a simple open or closed as it regulates flow in order to regulate boost.

There is nothing confusing about it.
Old 25-09-2012, 10:21 PM
  #35  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by v man
Fuck it mat

Wind it up

If it goes bang so what just build another

Well that's what I did in my series 2 many years ago and it was the best afternoons driving I've ever had


We use to pull the actuator pipe off and smoke the estate in my old rst lol.....
Old 26-09-2012, 09:53 AM
  #36  
fraser9764
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (3)
 
fraser9764's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,070
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Boost is never static. It is always rising/falling whether you can actually see it or not. That's why the wastegate is always varying it's opening. Again, it isnt a simple open or closed as it regulates flow in order to regulate boost.

There is nothing confusing about it.
What on earth are you on about?
You said inlet pressure rises but boost stays the same.
This is what I said was confusing as 'boost' is just differential pressure between atmospheric and inlet.
Old 26-09-2012, 10:01 AM
  #37  
CossieRich
Did Someone Mention TUV
iTrader: (1)
 
CossieRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 17,169
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Boost rules and breaks things
Old 26-09-2012, 10:22 AM
  #38  
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Not sure what your budget is Matt but going bigger capacity is the way forward, go 2300cc with a turbo that's not too big and you will have low lag. Trouble with the YB is that it's too small, just remove it and fit 6.0 LS2, job jobbed.
Old 26-09-2012, 10:33 AM
  #39  
pani_k
PassionFORD Member
iTrader: (1)
 
pani_k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Or twin turbo?
Old 26-09-2012, 11:22 AM
  #40  
Rsmat
300+

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Cheers guys.


Quick Reply: FAO tuners & engine builders or anyone in the know.



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:22 AM.