New Product range AIRTEC
#41
most of the product tests ive seen or read about that have been done, airtec usually fair very well often beating the more exspensive options (cue the M.A.D and spec r fanboys saying tests wernt done right lol)
#42
Never a more truer sentence said !!!!!!!always copying the best , yet people still seem to buy 2nd rate stuff , and then ask questions to see if it's still as good !!!!
It aint rocket science to work out why SPEC-R is the best .......
The top tuners ( MA Developments, Julian Godfrey and Joe at heart power )all use spec-r .
It aint rocket science to work out why SPEC-R is the best .......
The top tuners ( MA Developments, Julian Godfrey and Joe at heart power )all use spec-r .
ohh my dear sweet lord , im going to have go make another cuppa tea lol
this is hilarious ,
considering the spec r design cooler isnt there design !!! it was made by jenspeed !!
mark himself commented he tested one 7 years ago that ran bottom feed entry and exit feeds ,
so what exactly have they done to create a whole new cooler ??
turn it upside down pmsl !!
and on a sub note , im just tring to locate a pic from gatebil in 2005 , that ran a top feed ent /ex cooler like spec r's in a blue escos ......
i understand the mad /spec r crew are going to back there lads up ,
but id get the facts before fully slating other peoples work ect,
Sounds like a good idea James, seem like decent products too.
Can't believe that people are still arguing about copying. It's like saying you wish RS500 stlye coolers don't work because it's copying fords work.
At the end of the day who gives a fuck? It's the companies making the products problem, not mine or yours. We just benefit from choice and better prices. And moaning about 'one man band this, perfectionist that' is pointless too. Thats life in business.
Can't believe that people are still arguing about copying. It's like saying you wish RS500 stlye coolers don't work because it's copying fords work.
At the end of the day who gives a fuck? It's the companies making the products problem, not mine or yours. We just benefit from choice and better prices. And moaning about 'one man band this, perfectionist that' is pointless too. Thats life in business.
couldnt agree more mate ,
personally im not biased to a tuner at all , for me my car would be built with a part from every tuner in the uk if that tuners part does the job and is the most competively priced on the market ...
its been done to death in every other form of production and sales
some one undercutting someone else and then passing that product on to the customer is general practice ...
personally im happy that its starting to filter down to the cosworth market. for too long it seems the rs scene gets hit with " cossie tax " on parts , were other brands reap the benifit of cheaper performance parts ,
just my two cents worth .......
beef
#45
ohh my dear sweet lord , im going to have go make another cuppa tea lol
this is hilarious ,
considering the spec r design cooler isnt there design !!! it was made by jenspeed !!
mark himself commented he tested one 7 years ago that ran bottom feed entry and exit feeds ,
so what exactly have they done to create a whole new cooler ??
turn it upside down pmsl !!
and on a sub note , im just tring to locate a pic from gatebil in 2005 , that ran a top feed ent /ex cooler like spec r's in a blue escos ......
i understand the mad /spec r crew are going to back there lads up ,
but id get the facts before fully slating other peoples work ect,
couldnt agree more mate ,
personally im not biased to a tuner at all , for me my car would be built with a part from every tuner in the uk if that tuners part does the job and is the most competively priced on the market ...
its been done to death in every other form of production and sales
some one undercutting someone else and then passing that product on to the customer is general practice ...
personally im happy that its starting to filter down to the cosworth market. for too long it seems the rs scene gets hit with " cossie tax " on parts , were other brands reap the benifit of cheaper performance parts ,
just my two cents worth .......
beef
this is hilarious ,
considering the spec r design cooler isnt there design !!! it was made by jenspeed !!
mark himself commented he tested one 7 years ago that ran bottom feed entry and exit feeds ,
so what exactly have they done to create a whole new cooler ??
turn it upside down pmsl !!
and on a sub note , im just tring to locate a pic from gatebil in 2005 , that ran a top feed ent /ex cooler like spec r's in a blue escos ......
i understand the mad /spec r crew are going to back there lads up ,
but id get the facts before fully slating other peoples work ect,
couldnt agree more mate ,
personally im not biased to a tuner at all , for me my car would be built with a part from every tuner in the uk if that tuners part does the job and is the most competively priced on the market ...
its been done to death in every other form of production and sales
some one undercutting someone else and then passing that product on to the customer is general practice ...
personally im happy that its starting to filter down to the cosworth market. for too long it seems the rs scene gets hit with " cossie tax " on parts , were other brands reap the benifit of cheaper performance parts ,
just my two cents worth .......
beef
If you cant see what is diff from the spec r one to the jenspeed one then I must suggest you should have gone to spec savers
Mark
#46
#47
im sure they have,,, so we change our old design rs500 cooler to the latest fandangled model,, we lower our air temps by 3 degrees,,, and we gain,,,,, ummm 2 hp,,, well worth the 500 quid?
#48
No I have seen 30 to 40c reduction with the spec r cores at 500+hp.
Not tested one under 450hp to say on the reduction.
Mark
#49
so realistically until further testing is done at least 90% of us wont see the difference or feel the benifits of the, in my eyes overpriced spec r cooler? factor in the % of us that will only use it on the road and not track then even less of us need a spec r one and would be better off with the likes of airtec if it produces the numbers
#51
#52
#53
i had an airtec rad and cooler on my rs turbo and no complaints about the rad but the cooler was shit. when i drove the car hard the temp guage used to go up very high because the cooler seriously restricted airflow to the rad. when i changed the cooler this problem stopped completely and i could cain it all day
#54
so realistically until further testing is done at least 90% of us wont see the difference or feel the benifits of the, in my eyes overpriced spec r cooler? factor in the % of us that will only use it on the road and not track then even less of us need a spec r one and would be better off with the likes of airtec if it produces the numbers
Spec r can still make the old style RS500 cores but noone asks for them now,
20c is prob 10hp on a 330hp car so its up to the owner to say if its worth it for them.
Mark
#55
So your saying use a diff comp wheel to reduce airtemp when the 500 style cooler cannot cold it down,
I say fix the problem with the cooler and the onlly way you could drop it 40c with a turbo swap would mean fitting a GT42 to a GT30 car bit of a over kill.
Mark
#56
Without testing it would only be a guess based on what we see on the 330+hp cars but I would expect to see a 20c reduction,
Spec r can still make the old style RS500 cores but noone asks for them now,
20c is prob 10hp on a 330hp car so its up to the owner to say if its worth it for them.
Mark
Spec r can still make the old style RS500 cores but noone asks for them now,
20c is prob 10hp on a 330hp car so its up to the owner to say if its worth it for them.
Mark
#57
#58
so what temps did you see with an rs500 intercooler,, then after fitted the fandango?
#59
#60
#61
was pressure differential measured on both coolers? as thats one HELL of an improvement if DP was near as dam the same
#62
#65
That does not surprise me, their 100mm is more on the level of spec r
We did a basic comparison on temperature only on two engines running the same turbo and boost levels and peak temperatures were only a few degrees apart but the spec r seemed to cool back down slightly better. However this was the early pro twin 50mm cores I hear the new 100mm core is better
We did a basic comparison on temperature only on two engines running the same turbo and boost levels and peak temperatures were only a few degrees apart but the spec r seemed to cool back down slightly better. However this was the early pro twin 50mm cores I hear the new 100mm core is better
#67
i think to truely evaluate an intercooler you need the following information
inlet/outlet air temps plus ambient air temps
mass flow rate
inlet/outlet pressure (and pressure differential,)
a steady airflow rate at the intercooler
relative humidity
i think without knowing all these its hard to judge which is best.
does anyone agree with me or am i just being silly?
inlet/outlet air temps plus ambient air temps
mass flow rate
inlet/outlet pressure (and pressure differential,)
a steady airflow rate at the intercooler
relative humidity
i think without knowing all these its hard to judge which is best.
does anyone agree with me or am i just being silly?
#68
#70
#71
That's as maybe. If I purchased this kind of product and it needed to be bent/cut to make it fit I'd make it fuck back.
Last edited by MAD Ade; 05-01-2012 at 11:36 PM.
#72
#77
#78
But mine has a take off for a dump valve which i'm not sure is coming on them std
#79
i think to truely evaluate an intercooler you need the following information
inlet/outlet air temps plus ambient air temps
mass flow rate
inlet/outlet pressure (and pressure differential,)
a steady airflow rate at the intercooler
relative humidity
i think without knowing all these its hard to judge which is best.
does anyone agree with me or am i just being silly?
inlet/outlet air temps plus ambient air temps
mass flow rate
inlet/outlet pressure (and pressure differential,)
a steady airflow rate at the intercooler
relative humidity
i think without knowing all these its hard to judge which is best.
does anyone agree with me or am i just being silly?
#80