dynapack v dyno dynamics ? FAO chip, mad, msd, nms ...........
#41
Happily retired
Since this thread is back up mine made 809bhp on DD Rollers about 30 down on the Dyno figure. Im happy with that. Thats within 3.6 % .
Will run it again with the new GTX Turbo & a shot of Nitrous in the new year & this time they will have the latest straps to try & hold it down.
Will run it again with the new GTX Turbo & a shot of Nitrous in the new year & this time they will have the latest straps to try & hold it down.
#43
10K+ Poster!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Since this thread is back up mine made 809bhp on DD Rollers about 30 down on the Dyno figure. Im happy with that. Thats within 3.6 % .
Will run it again with the new GTX Turbo & a shot of Nitrous in the new year & this time they will have the latest straps to try & hold it down.
Will run it again with the new GTX Turbo & a shot of Nitrous in the new year & this time they will have the latest straps to try & hold it down.
once the sup is sorted i intend on getting it run on a dd, not on my 888s though !
#44
10K+ Poster!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
mine was run on tdis made 760 last time, the confusion comes when people start adding 17% to the wheel figures, this gives a over inflated flywheel figure, add 9 - 10 % is far more realistic imo, or just stick with the wheel figure.
#45
Happily retired
It was done at a RR road day so calculated fly. The 800+bhp Capri there on the same day made 770bhp & he was not happy most were getting 30ish brake down on what they thought they had , I think the figure was about right.
#46
The confusion comes when people start quoting dyno figures, of any kind lol.
#47
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
If you have time read this.........
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=398130
As far as im concerned dyno figures are a can of worms. How the car/engine performs matters so much more then a figure.
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=398130
As far as im concerned dyno figures are a can of worms. How the car/engine performs matters so much more then a figure.
#48
Happily retired
#49
10K+ Poster!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
i want to see a dd dyno with the supra but will have to put my pirellis back on as im 100% confident it will tear the 888s to shreds on a tyre dyno.
#50
The confusion lies because idiots will believe any number they want to believe. Whether it is right or wrong, high or low.
Or in the case of American dyno's, mega high or very high.
#51
Happily retired
Believe me Steve i am no idiot . We dynoed in public with a mags chosed expert in attendance on a rivals engine Dyno where favours were not going to happen . No secret squirel or non showing of Dyno Graphs at MAD .
#52
Doesnt matter whether a 2yr old child has drawn the graph, or a drunken heroin addict. Put a graph on an internet forum along with some well written rubbish and there is a wide audience who will believe it's true. Even more so if they are selling something shiny to back it up.
#53
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rotherham
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To the thread.
I find the Dyna packs read about 10% high. This is because;
a, you haven't got the tyres running on the rollers IMO one of the biggest factors.
b' the weight of the wheel.
DD's run a calculation based method, this only applies in shootout 44 mode where the ramp rate is static, obviously if the ramp rate changes you cannot calculate loses from the wheel weights etc.
No methods are 100% accurate, If the dyno has a rundown test at least if you change something like the wheel weights this can be added.
Just something simple like how the car is strapped down or how the RPM is scaled can make a huge difference to the power/torque.
I find the Dyna packs read about 10% high. This is because;
a, you haven't got the tyres running on the rollers IMO one of the biggest factors.
b' the weight of the wheel.
DD's run a calculation based method, this only applies in shootout 44 mode where the ramp rate is static, obviously if the ramp rate changes you cannot calculate loses from the wheel weights etc.
No methods are 100% accurate, If the dyno has a rundown test at least if you change something like the wheel weights this can be added.
Just something simple like how the car is strapped down or how the RPM is scaled can make a huge difference to the power/torque.
#54
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
To the thread.
I find the Dyna packs read about 10% high. This is because;
a, you haven't got the tyres running on the rollers IMO one of the biggest factors.
b' the weight of the wheel.
DD's run a calculation based method, this only applies in shootout 44 mode where the ramp rate is static, obviously if the ramp rate changes you cannot calculate loses from the wheel weights etc.
No methods are 100% accurate, If the dyno has a rundown test at least if you change something like the wheel weights this can be added.
Just something simple like how the car is strapped down or how the RPM is scaled can make a huge difference to the power/torque.
I find the Dyna packs read about 10% high. This is because;
a, you haven't got the tyres running on the rollers IMO one of the biggest factors.
b' the weight of the wheel.
DD's run a calculation based method, this only applies in shootout 44 mode where the ramp rate is static, obviously if the ramp rate changes you cannot calculate loses from the wheel weights etc.
No methods are 100% accurate, If the dyno has a rundown test at least if you change something like the wheel weights this can be added.
Just something simple like how the car is strapped down or how the RPM is scaled can make a huge difference to the power/torque.
#55
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rotherham
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really cant imagine that the 11 an 24 in that should be so far apart.
I know this is an over simplification, but working on the basis that the 4wd has 3 diffs and a box, and the fwd has 1 diff and a box.
11 = d + g
24 = 3d + g
24 - 11 = (3d + g) - (d + g)
13 = 2d
6.5 = d
Which would kind of imply that it thinks that you would lose more power through a diff than through a gearbox?
If you run similar numbers with the 15 and 21 which IIRC the DD uses, its a lot more sensible at the end of it!
I know this is an over simplification, but working on the basis that the 4wd has 3 diffs and a box, and the fwd has 1 diff and a box.
11 = d + g
24 = 3d + g
24 - 11 = (3d + g) - (d + g)
13 = 2d
6.5 = d
Which would kind of imply that it thinks that you would lose more power through a diff than through a gearbox?
If you run similar numbers with the 15 and 21 which IIRC the DD uses, its a lot more sensible at the end of it!
Diff 5% gearbox 6%.
However, I'm sure DD know you cannot loose all that power per extra diff, i'm sure its more down to weight of the drivetrain as well. I.e. prob, shafts, discs, these would play a bigger roll in the acceleration test. When doing a "static" pull you remove the inertia forces, and then just have the actual tyre and gearbox losses which I imagine aren't anywhere near.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wheelwizardrefurbs
Technical help Q & A
8
18-09-2015 08:59 PM