When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
General Car Related Discussion.To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.
ro'd done it numerous times
martin's done it although i'm not sure how many times
martin has said enough
rod is going to go for a bit more than the 206.something he's already done
other than that, there was dave who nearly had it but has now bought an evo and some chap who reckons he'll do it for around Ł10k
I remember reading about that in FastFord. It certainly made a mess!
If you read about the damage then you would have known whether an Escos had achieved 200mph or not as it was part of the same feature Your initial post suggests otherwise
Originally Posted by Evey
Anyone cracked it?
I know of a white saph (M. A. developments?) but have any other Cosworths? Any EsCos?
I'll search next time then, I need to search for Jaffa cakes as a tag yes?
Just how many Fords have tried/achieved 200mph
Its just the general package, its not just a power race, but suspension, aerodynamics, and the like. Tyres etc.
I thought it would be a good base for a discussion, I was wrong
as a rough guide, to do it in a saff cosworth you will need 700bhp to achieve it, this can either be done with a big turbo or nitrous or a combination of both.
suspension wont make much difference but being lower to the floor helps aero, just taking the wing mirrors off will be fine.
Tyres should be fine but then as you see with martin, get a bad tyre and it goes very wrong.
my thread talks about 200mph a fair bit if it helps
will the Reyland Esc cos be out on track again this year??
very little mentioned about it for a while now..
Seems ages since I last saw it at combe in the summer...
will the Reyland Esc cos be out on track again this year??
very little mentioned about it for a while now..
Seems ages since I last saw it at combe in the summer...
It didn't get much use last year but all being well it will be around more this year, its just sitting there waiting to be used.
You mean Mr. Tarry.....He's the old fruit with the White Saph MadRod on here
Then there is MR. Hadland, Martin's Escort cracked 200mph without Nos (unlike Rod)
Rod's had done 200 both on and off nitrous long before Martin's did, but it was never officially timed off the gas as obviously all the record breaking runs were done on gas, Rod being a stickler for the rules never quotes any times other than official ones, but it has done it, so your comment is very inaccurate as it implies his car hasnt done it, which of course it has.
Rod's had done 200 both on and off nitrous long before Martin's did, but it was never officially timed off the gas as obviously all the record breaking runs were done on gas, Rod being a stickler for the rules never quotes any times other than official ones, but it has done it, so your comment is very inaccurate as it implies his car hasnt done it, which of course it has.
201 OFF 210 ON are unofficial times recorded, best official time off gas is 183.2 back in 2002 & 206.08 on set in 2005. The 206.0 set in the damp shows how weak that official record is as accleration was terrible below 175 on that day & gas used only iover 185 we only used 1.4miles of the runway.
Probably worth doing a run off the gas officially timed when you are out next just for the sake of shutting up all the saddos who are forever bitching about it using gas, lol
I had over 200mph out of the Mondeo on a private track years ago, can I mention that as an un-offical speed?
You can do whatever you want, you can say you did 300 if you like, but it obviously wont change the facts about Rod's car, and IMHO its pretty sad to imply you think they arent accurate unless you actually believe Rod is a liar and im sure you know him better than that!
You can do whatever you want, you can say you did 300 if you like, but it obviously wont change the facts about Rod's car, and IMHO its pretty sad to imply you think they arent accurate unless you actually believe Rod is a liar and im sure you know him better than that!
My remark was not supposed to cast doubt on Rods efforts, it was a tongue in cheek kind of remark. As usual chipalata you jumped in both feet first!
My remark was not supposed to cast doubt on Rods efforts, it was a tongue in cheek kind of remark. As usual chipalata you jumped in both feet first!
If you read my reply, I said that I am sure you know rod better, so my comment wasnt aimed at you specifically, more at others who are making similar comments without them being tongue in cheek.