General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Power Limit on Standard Internals(Cosworth YB)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15-08-2009, 09:36 AM
  #1  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Power Limit on Standard Internals(Cosworth YB)?

What sort of power could you have an engine from say a sapph Cosworth running at on standard internals before it would be classed as unsafe?
Old 15-08-2009, 09:57 AM
  #2  
andrewg
PassionFord Post Troll
 
andrewg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ayrshire
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

prob rpms that make it weak point

550 is prob average
Old 15-08-2009, 10:01 AM
  #3  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cheers. Didn't think it would be as much as that!
Old 15-08-2009, 10:02 AM
  #4  
andrewg
PassionFord Post Troll
 
andrewg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ayrshire
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

there will be tuners that will prob run over 600 on standard internals
Old 15-08-2009, 10:23 AM
  #5  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Are you referring to standard unmachined standard compression pistons as well andrewg?
And what about the head? Surely you dont mean standard there?

Last edited by Chip; 15-08-2009 at 10:47 AM.
Old 15-08-2009, 10:40 AM
  #6  
TurboShed
Cossiemodo
 
TurboShed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am VERY interested in any discussion about how much power and how, can be got out of standard compression. When I had my engine rebuilt, I regretted staying with standard compression, because I thought I was limited to 400bhp. Am I wrong?
Old 15-08-2009, 10:52 AM
  #7  
Staffi
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Staffi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Don't be nosey
Posts: 21,194
Received 107 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

550-600 Andrew?? i always assumed it was way below that, more around 400-450 max, shows what i know
Old 15-08-2009, 10:54 AM
  #8  
Staffi
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Staffi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Don't be nosey
Posts: 21,194
Received 107 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Surely the Block too would be struggling at the above power levels?? well 205 anyway
Old 15-08-2009, 11:16 AM
  #9  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was meaning totally standard engine in every way. Only bolt on mods etc and mapping to increase the power.
Old 15-08-2009, 11:20 AM
  #10  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan_D
I was meaning totally standard engine in every way. Only bolt on mods etc and mapping to increase the power.
Do you want it driveable or just a big peak figure, cause I have a turbo for sale that would definately see you over 500bhp on a totally standard engine, but it probably wouldnt be doing much below 6-7Krpm, then just a quick squirt of big power upto the limiter at say 8K and when you changed gear it would be off boost again and shit, but would get you a big figure.

In terms of good driveable power, on standard cams etc still, I would say low 400s on a GT3071 is the best power you will get whilst still being nice to drive.
Old 15-08-2009, 11:27 AM
  #11  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, I'd want it do be driveable as opposed to making a peak figure. I don't actually have a Cosworth, I was just curious, although I'm looking at building a track day car soon and a Cosworth is one of the possibilities.

The other is building a classic shape Impreza with the Newage running gear, and they are something I'm fairly familiar with, hence asking this question on here.
Old 15-08-2009, 11:33 AM
  #12  
andrewg
PassionFord Post Troll
 
andrewg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ayrshire
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

when he said limit i was thinkin about parts that need to be uprated before they break!
Old 15-08-2009, 11:35 AM
  #13  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andrewg
when he said limit i was thinkin about parts that need to be uprated before they break!
That is what I meant.
Old 15-08-2009, 12:09 PM
  #14  
cozzie4d
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
cozzie4d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Holland
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd say a standard head won't go much further then 400 to 430bhp.
that would be the weakest link then
Old 15-08-2009, 12:13 PM
  #15  
pete mcrash
saff is working!!!...atm
iTrader: (1)
 
pete mcrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fishburn sex shop...co.durham
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cozzie4d
I'd say a standard head won't go much further then 400 to 430bhp.
that would be the weakest link then
......cossierich did 450+ on a std head (with cam)....
Old 15-08-2009, 12:15 PM
  #16  
cossie daz
Advanced PassionFord User
 
cossie daz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: gatwick
Posts: 1,923
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pete mcrash
......cossierich did 450+ on a std head (with cam)....
you beat me to it
Old 15-08-2009, 12:16 PM
  #17  
dave cos4x4
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (5)
 
dave cos4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 26,872
Received 30 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

mine did 430 on a standard engine.
Old 15-08-2009, 12:18 PM
  #18  
pete mcrash
saff is working!!!...atm
iTrader: (1)
 
pete mcrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fishburn sex shop...co.durham
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dave cos4x4
mine did 430 on a standard engine.
.......then ya crashed it..................
Old 15-08-2009, 12:32 PM
  #19  
TurboShed
Cossiemodo
 
TurboShed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cozzie4d
I'd say a standard head won't go much further then 400 to 430bhp.
that would be the weakest link then
You mean it wouldn't flow enough, or that something would break?
Old 15-08-2009, 12:42 PM
  #20  
cozzie4d
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
cozzie4d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Holland
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd say play it "safe" and don't go over 400bhp
Old 15-08-2009, 12:45 PM
  #21  
BRAMMER
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (23)
 
BRAMMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The North
Posts: 9,665
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip

In terms of good driveable power, on standard cams etc still, I would say low 400s on a GT3071 is the best power you will get whilst still being nice to drive.
Chip i've been meaning to pm you regarding these turbo's - this is something i want to change over the winter so if you could pm me what the prices are and do you recommend internal or external gate??
Old 15-08-2009, 12:47 PM
  #22  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andrewg
when he said limit i was thinkin about parts that need to be uprated before they break!
Agreed then, strength wise the crank and rods are well proven at 600bhp, and the standard pistons are physically strong enough for that even if most people prefer to lower the CR.
Old 15-08-2009, 12:48 PM
  #23  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan_D
Yes, I'd want it do be driveable as opposed to making a peak figure. I don't actually have a Cosworth, I was just curious, although I'm looking at building a track day car soon and a Cosworth is one of the possibilities.

The other is building a classic shape Impreza with the Newage running gear, and they are something I'm fairly familiar with, hence asking this question on here.
Get the scooby mate, it will be a far better trackday car on a sensible budget.

Just look at the rear suspension setup on the two cars!
Old 15-08-2009, 01:57 PM
  #24  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I already know that I could have a 400bhp Impreza which I could drive to and from trackdays/events, it would be that reliable when done right. So maybe it is the better option? The whole reason behind going for Newage running gear would be for strength/reliability, as the drivetrain is well known to be able to stand up to 500bhp, whereas the Classic drivetrain is the complete opposite: soft as shite!

Last edited by Alan_D; 15-08-2009 at 02:01 PM.
Old 15-08-2009, 02:31 PM
  #25  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

You could just use a complete newage car, far less hassle and they arent mega money anymore.
Old 15-08-2009, 02:39 PM
  #26  
fuzzy
14000+ post superhero
 
fuzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: upside down in a field
Posts: 17,459
Received 490 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

surely 400bhp will be reliable in any engine done right? its the done right part that most fail on.
Old 15-08-2009, 02:49 PM
  #27  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
You could just use a complete newage car, far less hassle and they arent mega money anymore.
Want a classic as they are a bit lighter.
Old 15-08-2009, 04:04 PM
  #28  
pete mcrash
saff is working!!!...atm
iTrader: (1)
 
pete mcrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fishburn sex shop...co.durham
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan_D
Want a classic as they are a bit lighter.
....and a better looking car.........
Old 15-08-2009, 05:11 PM
  #29  
col cos1
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (5)
 
col cos1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: edinburgh
Posts: 6,977
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i couldnt get more than 360ish@wheels out of standard head on greys
Old 15-08-2009, 06:43 PM
  #30  
600bhp escos
BANNED
BANNED
 
600bhp escos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: horsham
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

std engine with just bolt ons...i wouldnt go over 400 bhp otherwise it will be problematic...a ported head at this level only allows for bhp for less boost...a bd 14 inlet can achieve 500ish with the right bits after 500 bhp i would always use proper forged pistons..mahles always go out of shape quick much over 500bhp...
Old 15-08-2009, 06:47 PM
  #31  
600bhp escos
BANNED
BANNED
 
600bhp escos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: horsham
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by col cos1
i couldnt get more than 360ish@wheels out of standard head on greys
thats around 440 bhp so thats bloody good...my last 500 was running 4 greys the t4 and bd14 on std engine at 2 bar and made 426
Old 15-08-2009, 06:53 PM
  #32  
pete mcrash
saff is working!!!...atm
iTrader: (1)
 
pete mcrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fishburn sex shop...co.durham
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by col cos1
i couldnt get more than 360ish@wheels out of standard head on greys
......mine gets that at the mo.....and would probably do more (with bigger injectors, more boost).....how much more i dont know....
Old 15-08-2009, 07:07 PM
  #33  
Glenn_
Glennvestite
iTrader: (1)
 
Glenn_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Darlington county durham
Posts: 62,761
Received 1,044 Likes on 998 Posts
Default

Pete no way is yours 360 your saff is well fooking fast.
Old 15-08-2009, 07:12 PM
  #34  
600bhp escos
BANNED
BANNED
 
600bhp escos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: horsham
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Glenny Boy
Pete no way is yours 360 your saff is well fooking fast.
360@wheels is around 440 at fly so would be fucking quick!!!
Old 15-08-2009, 10:16 PM
  #35  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,923
Received 259 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan_D
Well I already know that I could have a 400bhp Impreza which I could drive to and from trackdays/events, it would be that reliable when done right. So maybe it is the better option? The whole reason behind going for Newage running gear would be for strength/reliability, as the drivetrain is well known to be able to stand up to 500bhp, whereas the Classic drivetrain is the complete opposite: soft as shite!
Re Subaru.

Unless its a new model short motor ( ie STI8 or bove ), 400bhp on a SUbaru bottom end is a ticking time bomb especially with track use.
The conrods in the std engine are crap, although the later STI rods are much better. Pistons whether forged STI types or cast will handle 400bhp fine if tuned correctly.
If its a new model STI car you have with 6speed box etc...then with a couple of bolt on bits, you'll easily see a reliable 400bhp. Maybe even about 450bhp with the right turbo at say 1.6/1.7bar
One of Lateral's MD321T's would get you there, or for faster spool aim for the MD321H and slightly less power.
It'll go well, handle well, and have an almost unbreakable drivetrain.


Re Cossie.
They've a steel crank, steel rods, and good forged pistons. Head sealing aside....no reason why you couldnt ram a load of boost into one with a big lower.

I seen one in Malta just scraping 10s runs, totally standard engine ( with studs and head gasket ) with a T66 bolted to it running about 40psi lol ( along with other supporting bolt on mods of course )

Seemed to work fine for him.

Last edited by stevieturbo; 15-08-2009 at 10:19 PM.
Old 15-08-2009, 10:24 PM
  #36  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Re Subaru.

Unless its a new model short motor ( ie STI8 or bove ), 400bhp on a SUbaru bottom end is a ticking time bomb especially with track use.
The conrods in the std engine are crap, although the later STI rods are much better. Pistons whether forged STI types or cast will handle 400bhp fine if tuned correctly.


Re Cossie.
They've a steel crank, steel rods, and good forged pistons. Head sealing aside....no reason why you couldnt ram a load of boost into one with a big lower.

I seen one in Malta just scraping 10s runs, totally standard engine ( with studs and head gasket ) with a T66 bolted to it running about 40psi lol ( along with other supporting bolt on mods of course )

Seemed to work fine for him.
Cheers. I already have a built 2.5 bottom end priced from Api. That would be more than capable.

Regarding the standard internals: Andy Forrest ran 440bhp on a 95 WRX years ago with standard internals. He used to drive to and from events. He will be doing all my mapping, and giving all advice should I go down the Subaru route again, so I am not concerned with that.

I would be interested in a Focus Cosworth conversion though. I have had a few road going Focus' now and think the handling is spot on, but what concerns me is how they will handle with rear or 4wd, as obviously they aren't designed for that?
Old 15-08-2009, 10:30 PM
  #37  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,923
Received 259 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

He may have done so...but it wasnt a customers car, and he wasnt concerned about breakages.

old rods on standard engines have failed at standard power with abusive drivers. It simply isnt worth the risk pushing them too hard, especially if its a track car. The std rods are crap.

"Handling" is an individual assessment.

A well built and designed car would go very fast in 4wd trim. Less so in 2wd obviously.
Old 15-08-2009, 10:40 PM
  #38  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
He may have done so...but it wasnt a customers car, and he wasnt concerned about breakages.

old rods on standard engines have failed at standard power with abusive drivers. It simply isnt worth the risk pushing them too hard, especially if its a track car. The std rods are crap.

"Handling" is an individual assessment.

A well built and designed car would go very fast in 4wd trim. Less so in 2wd obviously.
He ran it for 2 years at that power.

To be honest I'd be totally confident about running an Impreza engine on standard internals up to 400bhp if it was mapped by a top mapper. Plenty of Subaru engines have failed because they are played about with by amateurs! The standard rods might be crap(in your opinion), but I would think the failures you talk about would invlove some underlying cause. If not, then it's just bad luck. But I have used a UK Turbo engine at 270bhp(so over 50bhp more than standard) like a race engine for about 20000 miles and it didn't bat an eyelid.
Old 15-08-2009, 11:06 PM
  #39  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,923
Received 259 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

You just need to ask around.

Classic rods are crap that is fact, not just my opinion, and Ive seen them fail on totally standard cars, rod life has little to do with mapping. Its the same rods used on the EJ18, 20, 22 etc whether normally aspirated or turbocharged.

A friend also has a std UK 2.0 running about 350, and has some 160k miles on it now. So they can be reliable too...but it cant be gauranteed.
Old 15-08-2009, 11:22 PM
  #40  
Alan_D
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Alan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't need to ask around though, as I am 100% confident about having an Impreza mapped for more than standard power on standard internals. I have never even thought of the rods as being an issue, and Andy didn't mention that either strangely enough?? I take it you are familiar with what he does? He is a professional, probably one of the best, if not the best at what he does in Europe.

I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, as this thread has now gone totally off topic.

Last edited by Alan_D; 15-08-2009 at 11:25 PM.


Quick Reply: Power Limit on Standard Internals(Cosworth YB)?



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:06 AM.