170bhp @ 5psi
Trending Topics
16-12-2004, 10:04 PM
#12
just finding my feet
Originally Posted by Paul J
Yeah nice photo 
Whats the spec?
Whats the spec?
im not sure though, i asked grant and he thought it was a piston
16-12-2004, 10:20 PM
#15
just finding my feet
Originally Posted by Paul J
You work in Halfords yeah B19BAL???
cant do the bolt on shite jokes as i do em all day long when im at work
or do ya want a discount on neons for ya car
16-12-2004, 10:28 PM
#17
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Essex
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha mate! thats funny!
i watched that car get built so i know the exact spec of it!
wot you getting frustrated coz your dog wont lick that penut butter off ya bollox!
i watched that car get built so i know the exact spec of it!
wot you getting frustrated coz your dog wont lick that penut butter off ya bollox!
16-12-2004, 10:28 PM
#18
just finding my feet
ya may be suprised at my knowlage matey, just cause i work at a place you have no knowlage of dont make me stupid
just cause i take the piss and post shote dont make me stupid either
infact i could be thinking about building a 2.1 zetec engined car to wheel spin and torque steer all over the place
or i could stick with a car that holds 25psi up to the limiter thats rwd
fast cars get from point A to point B in a short space of time, not spin on the line and then go left
just cause i take the piss and post shote dont make me stupid either
infact i could be thinking about building a 2.1 zetec engined car to wheel spin and torque steer all over the place
or i could stick with a car that holds 25psi up to the limiter thats rwd
fast cars get from point A to point B in a short space of time, not spin on the line and then go left
16-12-2004, 10:31 PM
#20
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So whats the point of this post then? To share a pic? Cant be to increase Jano's profile as an engine builder as he aint a trader and it cant be to brag about figures cause no-one belives the bullshit without prove.
16-12-2004, 10:41 PM
#22
just finding my feet
Originally Posted by Paul J
So whats the point of this post then? To share a pic? Cant be to increase Jano's profile as an engine builder as he aint a trader and it cant be to brag about figures cause no-one belives the bullshit without prove.
hes made paul hills rollers read a high bhp with 5psi "cough"wheel spin "cough"
hes doing no different post to tiff talking about karl or ranj talking about mark
keep up the good work
16-12-2004, 10:53 PM
#23
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hes made paul hills rollers read a high bhp with 5psi "cough"wheel spin "cough"
or gear used but you cant deny wheel spin makes a run totally unusable?
16-12-2004, 11:03 PM
#25
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was never one of Jano's haters but him and his gimp seem to be all tight lipped about this magical 170bhp RsT Only interested in spec
Only interested in spec
16-12-2004, 11:13 PM
#26
just finding my feet
Originally Posted by Paul J
I was never one of Jano's haters but him and his gimp seem to be all tight lipped about this magical 170bhp RsT Only interested in spec
Only interested in spec think thought to make 170bhp on a zetec its either gona be high comp, much bigger than a 2.0 or perhaps the rollers where having a off day due to the weather
but then the other way to look at it is i wouldnt be happy to have 170bhp if i have a 16v engine fitted
16-12-2004, 11:30 PM
#27
Jeebus
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't see the fuss about turbo engines making power at 'low boost'.
Just because it makes 170bhp at 5psi doesn't mean it will work well with high boost - infact to me it means it is better tailored to being a N/A engine to a turbo one
Big power turbo engines for road ful/cars don't make big power at low boost.. FACT.
Just because it makes 170bhp at 5psi doesn't mean it will work well with high boost - infact to me it means it is better tailored to being a N/A engine to a turbo one
Big power turbo engines for road ful/cars don't make big power at low boost.. FACT.
16-12-2004, 11:35 PM
#30
just finding my feet
Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
Fords 16valvers were making 204bhp with 8 psi almost 20yrs ago.. so nowt staggering there
4years later they were doing 227... so why are we going down to 170 now?
4years later they were doing 227... so why are we going down to 170 now?
fooker, thats got a slighty different engine though, quality reply though
16-12-2004, 11:41 PM
#33
20K+ Super Poster.
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 23,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can we have a bit of a spec sheet then if we're supposed to be impressed?
From my recollection, even the old early knackered 2 litre Mondeo engines were making 136bhp, and the later ones making 150bhp.
From my recollection, even the old early knackered 2 litre Mondeo engines were making 136bhp, and the later ones making 150bhp.
16-12-2004, 11:58 PM
#34
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stanford le hope
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i seen the car and engine ..looking good jano a lot of time and effort and it shows.... 
lets not turn this post bitchy aye guys..
boostboys car is rapid even at low boost so im quite beleaving his car is quick ...
lets not turn this post bitchy aye guys..
boostboys car is rapid even at low boost so im quite beleaving his car is quick ...
17-12-2004, 08:11 AM
#36
Testing the future
i judge the quality of the guys work from the quality of his photo's. you'd get better pictures from david blunkett.
i mean, come on. at least if you're trying to market stuff over the internet, use a proper digicam and not a cheap shitty camera phone.
if you must use a camera phone, at least get a decent megapixel one.
i mean, come on. at least if you're trying to market stuff over the internet, use a proper digicam and not a cheap shitty camera phone.
if you must use a camera phone, at least get a decent megapixel one.
17-12-2004, 08:11 AM
#37
I agree with Phil you cant have your cake and eat it, if you want big figures at low boost then you end up with too much compression to run big figures at high boost.
Making 170bhp @ 5psi makes it sound like it will be a good tractable road car.
Making 170bhp @ 5psi makes it sound like it will be a good tractable road car.
17-12-2004, 08:41 AM
#38
Originally Posted by foreigneRS
i judge the quality of the guys work from the quality of his photo's. you'd get better pictures from david blunkett.
i mean, come on. at least if you're trying to market stuff over the internet, use a proper digicam and not a cheap shitty camera phone.
if you must use a camera phone, at least get a decent megapixel one.
i mean, come on. at least if you're trying to market stuff over the internet, use a proper digicam and not a cheap shitty camera phone.
if you must use a camera phone, at least get a decent megapixel one.
