F1 rule change
#1
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F1 rule change
Yet another change for this season.
The drivers title will now be decided on wins, not points. What twat thought of that one?
This means the end of season finales like we had last year. Love or hate Hamilton, it was an interesting last race.
Does this mean that other formula's will follow suit? Hope not.
What do you all think?
The drivers title will now be decided on wins, not points. What twat thought of that one?
This means the end of season finales like we had last year. Love or hate Hamilton, it was an interesting last race.
Does this mean that other formula's will follow suit? Hope not.
What do you all think?
Trending Topics
#9
Proven Legendary Status
Join Date: May 2003
Location: England
Posts: 6,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yet another change for this season.
The drivers title will now be decided on wins, not points. What twat thought of that one?
This means the end of season finales like we had last year. Love or hate Hamilton, it was an interesting last race.
Does this mean that other formula's will follow suit? Hope not.
What do you all think?
The drivers title will now be decided on wins, not points. What twat thought of that one?
This means the end of season finales like we had last year. Love or hate Hamilton, it was an interesting last race.
Does this mean that other formula's will follow suit? Hope not.
What do you all think?
Potentially (though unlikely) the Title could be secured after 10 races which is less great.
We won't see much difference over the course of a year though. It will still be between 4-5 drivers. Though Massa would have won last years.
#12
STOP!... Carry on
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its a load of bollocks!!!!
a championship is about consistency! why reward hit and miss driving if someone is consistently coming first, second or third in each race??? it will just mean more kamikaze driving with more crashes, i.e. more cost to teams to replace cars that are battered...
IMO
make 1st = 12 point 2nd = 8 points then the rest as they are
more incentive to get 1st, but you can still win if you are consitently 2nd, if the guy who normal comes first is hit and miss...
a championship is about consistency! why reward hit and miss driving if someone is consistently coming first, second or third in each race??? it will just mean more kamikaze driving with more crashes, i.e. more cost to teams to replace cars that are battered...
IMO
make 1st = 12 point 2nd = 8 points then the rest as they are
more incentive to get 1st, but you can still win if you are consitently 2nd, if the guy who normal comes first is hit and miss...
#14
Advanced PassionFord User
I think it is a stupid idea it's only gonna make it harder for other drivers to win the championship this year as it wont be more open for others so it's only 1st or nothing, I think most drivers will give up having points makes it more interesting.
#15
............
would hardly have changed the results of the championchip since 1980.....would only have changed about 4 seasons, someone broke it down on another forum earlier on. Mansell would have been a 3 time champion tho
I'm kind of for it........it means that less people will be happy to sit there secure in second place if they could win
However stewards decisions now have much more significance as demoting someone from a win to second via a stop go could now cost them the title not just 2 points.
A ten place grid penalty is now a disaster for a top driver
I'm kind of for it........it means that less people will be happy to sit there secure in second place if they could win
However stewards decisions now have much more significance as demoting someone from a win to second via a stop go could now cost them the title not just 2 points.
A ten place grid penalty is now a disaster for a top driver
#16
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beer
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rule changes are shite to me. I was looking forward to the season with Brawn doing so well in testing but now its all a bit of a joke. The FIA do these surveys to see whatthe fans want and do the f'ing opposite.
Well done, bet that took you all day to think up
Well done, bet that took you all day to think up
#17
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 5,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can just imagine the powers that behind there desks thinking, ooooooo if it was decided on race wins then massa would have won! Ok sod it, we'll change the rules to give him/ferrari a better chance next year.
#18
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Example from 2 people meting in the pub.
Mike: Hey, Ben, you are following F1 right?
Ben: Yes thats correct.
Mike: That bloke Button has become champion right?
Ben: Yes, he had the most victories.
Mike: But Alonso also had a lot of victories.
Ben: Yes, after Button he had the most victories.
Mike: But why has Massa finished 2nd in the championchip then?
Ben: He had more points then Alonso.
Mike: But he also had more points then Button?
Ben: Yes, but Button won more races.
Mike: Alonso too!
Ben: Uhh, yes, but it just works like this.
Mike: Hey, Ben, you are following F1 right?
Ben: Yes thats correct.
Mike: That bloke Button has become champion right?
Ben: Yes, he had the most victories.
Mike: But Alonso also had a lot of victories.
Ben: Yes, after Button he had the most victories.
Mike: But why has Massa finished 2nd in the championchip then?
Ben: He had more points then Alonso.
Mike: But he also had more points then Button?
Ben: Yes, but Button won more races.
Mike: Alonso too!
Ben: Uhh, yes, but it just works like this.
#19
PassionFord Post Troll
#22
............
Based on Wins and points scored under the points system at the time ( not standardised to the 10-8-6 etc points of today ) the below list is the list of things that would have been different had the more wins rule been introduced in 1980. As you can see, not an awful lot of difference, most cases seems a better result to me ( as a Mansell fan!! )
2008 - Felipe Massa instead of Lewis Hamilton by one win.
1989 - Ayrton Senna instead of Alain Prost by two wins.
1987 - Nigel Mansell instead of Nelson Piquet by three wins.
1986 - Nigel Mansell instead of Alain Prost by one win.
1984 - Alain Prost instead of Niki Lauda by two wins.
1983 - Alain Prost instead of Nelson Piquet by one win.
1982 - Keke Rosberg would've lost. Didier Pironi, John Watson, Alain Prost, Niki Lauda and René Arnoux all have two wins to Keke's one. Pironi and Watson each on 39 points, each have two second places, Pironi wins with two third place finishes to Watson's one.
1981 - Nelson Piquet and Alain Prost tied on three wins each. Piquet wins on points 50 to Prost's 43. Prost finished 5th in '81 while Piquet won the title.
So what do we think now then?
2008 - Felipe Massa instead of Lewis Hamilton by one win.
1989 - Ayrton Senna instead of Alain Prost by two wins.
1987 - Nigel Mansell instead of Nelson Piquet by three wins.
1986 - Nigel Mansell instead of Alain Prost by one win.
1984 - Alain Prost instead of Niki Lauda by two wins.
1983 - Alain Prost instead of Nelson Piquet by one win.
1982 - Keke Rosberg would've lost. Didier Pironi, John Watson, Alain Prost, Niki Lauda and René Arnoux all have two wins to Keke's one. Pironi and Watson each on 39 points, each have two second places, Pironi wins with two third place finishes to Watson's one.
1981 - Nelson Piquet and Alain Prost tied on three wins each. Piquet wins on points 50 to Prost's 43. Prost finished 5th in '81 while Piquet won the title.
So what do we think now then?
#23
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely racing is about coming 1st ! not 2nd or 3rd . Makes sense to me . It might actually force these overpaid so called racing drivers to drive like they used to when the sport was first invented . You never saw Stirling Moss or Graham Hill playing points tactics did you .
#24
............
Surely racing is about coming 1st ! not 2nd or 3rd . Makes sense to me . It might actually force these overpaid so called racing drivers to drive like they used to when the sport was first invented . You never saw Stirling Moss or Graham Hill playing points tactics did you .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nicodinho
Ford Non RS / XR / ST parts for sale.
6
07-10-2015 12:56 PM