Yum to go 2wd? Or Options????
#322
yes mate done on thor racings dyno pack,but in rwd the front wheels do not turn,so it cant measure losses.the test was a set up of the gearbox control,looking at torque splits at different pressures.
#323
ahhh so it was on a dyno pack so at the hubs - even better for that test i guess as no tyres to add factors. Wouldnt want to be giving 30hp away so RWD it is for topend.
So with no pressure - eg rwd is a skyline conversion in drag terms somewhere between a RWD cossie and a 4wd one as it has to still turn the gubbings in the front diff with the front wheels even if the centre prop is not driving it?
So with no pressure - eg rwd is a skyline conversion in drag terms somewhere between a RWD cossie and a 4wd one as it has to still turn the gubbings in the front diff with the front wheels even if the centre prop is not driving it?
#324
Originally Posted by dumped
ahhh so it was on a dyno pack so at the hubs - even better for that test i guess as no tyres to add factors. Wouldnt want to be giving 30hp away so RWD it is for topend.
So with no pressure - eg rwd is a skyline conversion in drag terms somewhere between a RWD cossie and a 4wd one as it has to still turn the gubbings in the front diff with the front wheels even if the centre prop is not driving it?
So with no pressure - eg rwd is a skyline conversion in drag terms somewhere between a RWD cossie and a 4wd one as it has to still turn the gubbings in the front diff with the front wheels even if the centre prop is not driving it?
#327
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by lloyd
weight around 1ton
Lloyd, have you had it wiegh'd? as i cant see it beeing under 1120kg's.
thats going its a mk4 escort converted, skyline box, cossie running gear, beam etc etc.
#328
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by lloyd
weight around 1ton
Lloyd, have you had it wiegh'd? as i cant see it beeing under 1120kg's.
thats going its a mk4 escort converted, skyline box, cossie running gear, beam etc etc.
#329
Would be good to see what she does wiegh.
Mine comes in at 1220kg, everything removed (tools etc), no driver and full tank of fuel (45ltrs)
But thats
a modified xr2i shell,std wings,bonnet, boot, and PSG kit and bumpers
all glass, and full interior,
Full cossie engine,transmission, brakes, beam etc etc.
Steel fuel tank,
17" wheels, 330 6 pot brakes.
Mine comes in at 1220kg, everything removed (tools etc), no driver and full tank of fuel (45ltrs)
But thats
a modified xr2i shell,std wings,bonnet, boot, and PSG kit and bumpers
all glass, and full interior,
Full cossie engine,transmission, brakes, beam etc etc.
Steel fuel tank,
17" wheels, 330 6 pot brakes.
#332
#334
Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
Did we discuss what rod asked about trans losses?
as the more aero dynamic 4 wheel drive cars seem to slow down a bit a high speds compared to his?
as the more aero dynamic 4 wheel drive cars seem to slow down a bit a high speds compared to his?
All Martin has to do is take the silly WRC spoiler off to break his old cars record...
Just think he has bad memories of removing spoilers
#335
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Charlie Chalk
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
sure rod said the most aero dynamic cossie is a escort with the rear spoiler off.
Andys focus must be more aero than any of the cossies too
Andys focus must be more aero than any of the cossies too
Might need one of them
#338
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
sure rod said the most aero dynamic cossie is a escort with the rear spoiler off.
Andys focus must be more aero than any of the cossies too
Andys focus must be more aero than any of the cossies too
Thats correct, Daves 178.5 with a mere 440 equates to Martin having 590 when he ran 194.7 & I expect thats close to his actual figure.
The Saff with the spoiler on would need 30/40 more horses to pull those speeds. Ive no facts on the Escort with the wing on but I suspect its inferior to the Saff.
#339
Originally Posted by MAD YUM
Originally Posted by Bosch_Dealer
YUM..just break and buy a Porsche..get rid of that chav image
Chav image
Whens the saph for sale???, Thought might of seen it at Brands Hatch today
fooking quality .yes he must of left the house today
#340
Haven't read it all.
Sell it and buy an Evo, or go with a liner setup if that keeps AWD.
I'm guessing your car's big power, so 2wd will be pointless on the road. I've been out tonight in my evo and it struggled to grip in 3rd most of the time. I can't imagine what that would be like to the rear wheels. You'd only grip in 5th, you might as well have 4wd and 400bhp, surely this would be quicker on the road.
Sell it and buy an Evo, or go with a liner setup if that keeps AWD.
I'm guessing your car's big power, so 2wd will be pointless on the road. I've been out tonight in my evo and it struggled to grip in 3rd most of the time. I can't imagine what that would be like to the rear wheels. You'd only grip in 5th, you might as well have 4wd and 400bhp, surely this would be quicker on the road.
#341
Originally Posted by charlie luciano
Originally Posted by MadRod
Dave wishes to hold the Escort record, if it lasts 10minutes hes still achieved what he set out to do.
If it aint in the Guiness world record book it aint worth squat
Luciano
#342
Yum,
It's difficult for anyone to advise what to do, as only you know the reasons you built the car to the spec you did. However, I personally built mine DOWN to a power level, in a hope that this would give me more reliability from the transmission (yet despite this, I have still had issues with the front pinion lunching itself, albeit after a lot of miles ). However, despite my considerably lower power and torque figures, I won't EVER launch the car in the same way that you have / do . The reason being, although I would LOVE to know what it is capable of acceleration wise, I'm not prepared to throw several thousand at the transmission to find out . And as my car was built to go round track relatively fast, this is not something that interests me in the same way it does you (my car runs 3.9 gearing, so won't even do a high top speed).
Looking from the outside in, it would appear that what you have created is a rod for your own back, as you WANT a car that is regularly measured on acceleration / top speed runs and unfortunately this set-up requires the type of gearbox you say you want to avoid.
You could always accept the fact that with your current transmission, that launching the car is a no-no and then just enjoy doing top speed runs / track days (however that would require a quieter exhaust as well )? It's only launching the car that is causing you the major problems, so ipso-facto - DON'T launch .
Although 2wd will give you some reliability, it WILL make the car slower below 100mph (traction issues) and definitely slower on track.
It's difficult for anyone to advise what to do, as only you know the reasons you built the car to the spec you did. However, I personally built mine DOWN to a power level, in a hope that this would give me more reliability from the transmission (yet despite this, I have still had issues with the front pinion lunching itself, albeit after a lot of miles ). However, despite my considerably lower power and torque figures, I won't EVER launch the car in the same way that you have / do . The reason being, although I would LOVE to know what it is capable of acceleration wise, I'm not prepared to throw several thousand at the transmission to find out . And as my car was built to go round track relatively fast, this is not something that interests me in the same way it does you (my car runs 3.9 gearing, so won't even do a high top speed).
Looking from the outside in, it would appear that what you have created is a rod for your own back, as you WANT a car that is regularly measured on acceleration / top speed runs and unfortunately this set-up requires the type of gearbox you say you want to avoid.
You could always accept the fact that with your current transmission, that launching the car is a no-no and then just enjoy doing top speed runs / track days (however that would require a quieter exhaust as well )? It's only launching the car that is causing you the major problems, so ipso-facto - DON'T launch .
Although 2wd will give you some reliability, it WILL make the car slower below 100mph (traction issues) and definitely slower on track.
#343
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Looking from the outside in, it would appear that what you have created is a rod for your own back, as you WANT a car that is regularly measured on acceleration / top speed runs and unfortunately this set-up requires the type of gearbox you say you want to avoid.
It seems like Dave has the following requirements:
Must be a quiet and civilised gearbox
Must be able to take massive launches
Must be 4wd
Its only a swap for a standard skyline transmission that seems to offer that combination IMHO, and even then you are pushing your luck launching it very often probably!
#344
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by The Rapid 1
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by The Rapid 1
My torque was VERY REAL running less power (check terminal speeds ) and to get the times I did,
Steve
What was your best proper timed
60ft?
1/8 et and mph?
1/4 mile et and mph?
Best ever ticketed run was only 11.5
think the et mph was summit like 125mph but couldnt swear to it
BUT after some more head work different cams and a bit more nos, the 11.5 was on a 100 shot.
Steve
As much as i respect you and your cars times and efforts.
if it was on std sierra wieght, and 3.6 final and std ratio Quaife big tooth. 11.5 @ 120-125 is only 520 bhp and 430 lbft on the day it was timed. Even less if on a 3.9 final.
if you were running a true 600 bhp and 500lbft, a terminal 134+mph should be seen on your transmission.
So not really the same as Yum's power.
Originally Posted by lloyd
weight around 1ton
Lloyd, have you had it wiegh'd? as i cant see it beeing under 1120kg's.
thats going its a mk4 escort converted, skyline box, cossie running gear, beam etc etc.
But managed to find a couple slips and charts for you to pull apart mathematicaly
Do these "maths" workings allow for Nitrous and the way it delivers its power and the fitment of a Nitrous controller that alters the delivery of its power ?
The figure in the printout below is 484.6 lbft ok maybe not 500 but also not far off (100 shot not 150 )
For WHATEVER reason my car used to make its times off the line NOT top end , often used to have cars catching me near the top, didnt do its times with all out power, I always used to run slower MPH speeds than others with the same et's , THAT is what I used to always put down to the torque of the car pulling off the line, hence why I mentioned its torque and said my gearbox and std diffs did OK
Steve
#345
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by MAD YUM
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
I would give Bara another chance as they have said they will give a refund if it breaks again and the weather is crap and you still need to fit the wheels, So the extra time should fly by.
Mark
Mark
I cant believe how impatient dave is being, its not like wanting an off the shelf waterpump for a 1.6 focus or something that he is waiting on!
Its not that, just want to get it back to Brunters to beat my times
Got to drive for 1 day then of road for 3 months
#346
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by EsCosRacer
Originally Posted by MAD YUM
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
I would give Bara another chance as they have said they will give a refund if it breaks again and the weather is crap and you still need to fit the wheels, So the extra time should fly by.
Mark
Mark
I cant believe how impatient dave is being, its not like wanting an off the shelf waterpump for a 1.6 focus or something that he is waiting on!
Its not that, just want to get it back to Brunters to beat my times
Got to drive for 1 day then of road for 3 months
Wondered why you had not posted on this, but have found out you have been on your hols
Welcome back
#347
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Originally Posted by Robski
tottally off topic but i saw your 911 blasting down the M25 yesterday evening Lee,it looked and sounded
where was it, what were you in
Was I going fast
#348
i was turning off at junction 28 and in my Esc Cos when i heard this "BLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH" NOISE and a silver 911 TURBO went flying past....i just caught a glimpse of the dream number plate so i knew it was you!!....it did sound the nuts though!
#352
rapid 1, if you ran 100 shot of nos how did you control the nos pressure for 11 seconds?the most i have managed is a 40 shot,controlled by a bottle warmer.i found that when bottle pressure fell the mixture went rich and i lost power.that might explain your low speed at the end of the strip.
#353
Originally Posted by lloyd
rapid 1, if you ran 100 shot of nos how did you control the nos pressure for 11 seconds?the most i have managed is a 40 shot,controlled by a bottle warmer.i found that when bottle pressure fell the mixture went rich and i lost power.that might explain your low speed at the end of the strip.
But When I first started using "Nos" I also used the bottle heating technique, too unreliable.
After time I switched to adding Nitrogen to the bottle, this sits at the top of the bottle above the Nitrous at a higher pressure thus creating a higher pressure pushing the nitrous out.
Obviously if the day heats up so the pressure also would then go up, so I also had installed a bleed valve on the bottle sold by Wizard of Noz, which you can set to release pressure from the bottle at what pressure you want, so could inject the Nitrogen early in the day to set the bottle at 1000psi and as the day heated up it would gently bleed off the excessive Nitrogen and maintain 1000 psi, obviously as the day cooled again you then started to loose pressure again, but nowhere near as unreliable as the heater method, and if imperetive for pure max (didnt really see that great a drop off over the day to evening etc) could give another shot of Nitrogen into the bottle
I THINK im correct in saying Rod has/had/tried a similar setup, but his was plumbed in to KEEP the pressure exact at all times ?
Steve
#355
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Yeah the system we came up with for Rods car has a bottle of nitrogen in the boot too and bleeds that into the top of the ntirous bottle as the pressure drops.
Bit better than my concoction of "Y" pieces and lugging a bottle of Nitrogen about lol
BUT mine did what I wanted it to
#356
Originally Posted by The Rapid 1
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Yeah the system we came up with for Rods car has a bottle of nitrogen in the boot too and bleeds that into the top of the ntirous bottle as the pressure drops.
Bit better than my concoction of "Y" pieces and lugging a bottle of Nitrogen about lol
BUT mine did what I wanted it to
The car has never been timed Topspeed with this active but in tests its on a different planet to when the 206 was recorded.
#358
Originally Posted by lloyd
steve, did you monitor afr in the car?
As Lee said my car was VERY budget orientated lol
All I had was one of these
With an Escos Lamda sensor, No Widebands im affraid
BUT enough to show gross swings in AFR
Steve
#359
Originally Posted by The Rapid 1
Originally Posted by lloyd
steve, did you monitor afr in the car?
As Lee said my car was VERY budget orientated lol
All I had was one of these
With an Escos Lamda sensor, No Widebands im affraid
BUT enough to show gross swings in AFR
Steve