4x4

which one would be better?

is tunability the same on both cars?

not looking to buy one tommorow but could be getting one soon.

any ideas

Charlie Chalk

iTrader: (1)

Is this a piss take?

4x4

aagh your the guy whos having no luck

its not a piss take honest, my mates got a pulsar with no probs and if i was to get one it would be his coz i know it

maybe you should get a 200

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

200sx all the way! far better imo.

rsnissan

iTrader: (9)

plusar has a better turbo and throttle bodies as standard..........although these are much for much in the grand scheme of things.

p.s it depends on what you want from the cars as wo which one would be better

Charlie Chalk

iTrader: (1)

200sx would be better, better transmission anyway...


Don't care if it was a piss take, was just asking

4x4

would you say that on looks or perfomance? altho both are usually used for different types of race.....

im thinkin s14 coz of 2wd advantages including the fun/scary moments

4x4

Charlie Chalk

you need to add one more pic to the end of your sig

Charlie Chalk

iTrader: (1)

What ?

4x4

turbo is different? never new that! but all can be changed over i guess or even uprated

rsnissan

iTrader: (9)

if you get an s14 make sure you get an s14a

4x4

pic of money, empty driveway etc.....

rsnissan

iTrader: (9)

everyday is a school day its only an extra blade anyway for response IIRC

4x4

s14a

whats the difference?

Charlie Chalk

iTrader: (1)

LOL

PastyKing

Charlie Chalk
why am i on your msn block list fucker

Christian and Beccy

iTrader: (14)

S14 is the circa 1995 model. Had the SR20DET, but a relatively undesirable body shape.

The S14a which ran from around 1996 onwards has a much more appealing style with far more aggressive front-end etc. Definately the one to have.

Watch out for big-end failure, they are known for it, along with VVT rattle, rear bed bushes etc, which are all known weaknesses.

We specialise in these, so if you need any help.......

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

the 200sx seems to be a kinder car to own.ive only owned the pulsar though.but tranny was weakest link.quick cars 0-60 and down the quarter and totatlly awesome on th etwisties but so fragile.200sx will be more"fun" and entertaining and stay toghether better.but as said s14a is the one you want.

Charlie Chalk

iTrader: (1)

because your a piss taking cunt

4x4

would anyone know how a 350bhp s14 would do against similar powered rwd cosworths in terms off acceleration? not much in it is what i should think but someone might know

PastyKing

Charlie Chalk
you gotta admit that handwriting pic of the pulsar with smoke pissing out the back and the smashed window was funny

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

more expensive to get the 350 but there wont be loads in it.although the cossie will be a stronger pull from mid revs due to turbo size.normally t34 at that bhp

4x4

Christian and Beccy

nice one mate

i'll defo take you up on that when time comes to go on the hunt

so s14a has no engine differences? i have noticed some look different in std spec, it must be that

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

s14a is considered the baby skyline.although i'd rather have an s14a than a gtst/gtsm skyline.theres only one skyline to own imo,the gtr!

4x4

why do cossies have me by the balls?

your discription of the cossie having a harder pull makes me want a cos now, they just feel raw

do you mean more expensive t get the cos to 350bhp

4x4

this is what i say too, but there are some tasty gtst's around

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

thats cossies and rs's mate.i had my pulsar after a series 2 and then a 205 but always wanted a cossie.wont be without one anymore.
as you say,they are raw.and full of character.
the cossie is cheaper to get 350 from.330 bhp is piss easy and will cost round 500 to 800 quid depending on what you buy and who from.no other car gives bang for bucks like that.

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

yeah but theres that stigma. its the porsche boxster/911 thing.people think you cant afford the gtr.

4x4

CANcEL THIS THREAD.....Im buying a cossie ....no really

bullett you've just changed my mind with a few words cossies are the devils car.

Jamz

Really ? Never heard that before.

Christian and Beccy

iTrader: (14)

At what we know as 350bhp, against what the Cossie world thinks is 350bhp, there would be no contest. Not only would the 200SX be faster, but it would feel alot more 'proper' too.

What does it cost to get a Cossie to that power?

Redeye Jedi

Yer this.........

Charlie Chalk

iTrader: (1)

At least I'm not a pissup let down....



Oh did I say that

Redeye Jedi

Tame for your standards! Im sure you'll survive a little longer without my company!

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

?what do you mean christian?

gingeRS

I heard that last year,

I heard from a friend (girl) that this friend of hers, had a 'skyline', turns out he calls it a baby skyline, its a 200sx.

he took the girls (inc. my ex) home from the pub the day i met him (hadnt been drinking), but was busy showing off, and stuff it backwards up the curb, into a brick wall!

my ex GF had to be cut out of the car, and had neck problems for almost a year after that.

good thing the police were already there when we arrived, otherwise he would have been short a few teeth when he needed to give his statement, still makes me angry to this day

gingeRS

you must also consider ALOT of 200 owners always think they have 300+bhp cos they have, bought the right parts, but they have never been near a dyno.

i have wasted a few 'modified' 200's in my saff, and mines 4x4 and a fairly conservative stge 3 at best

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

Jamz

Bullett

iTrader: (2)

join the club mate.and the evo's.i know one that was rollered at 314 when mine was 330 on a t3 and i was pulling away without a prob.not huge amounts but a noticable amount.

Stavros

same engine code, very different engines, not even interchangable.

id go for the SX tho