Cone filters BIG or small !!!!!!!!!!!!
Trending Topics
#8
DEYTUKURJERBS
bigger is better, its purely a restriction thing,
and on the ROAD (not rollers), esp on turbo cars, cones dont make much higer charge temps than boxes.
and no restriction is more important than charge temps (take note big power oweners with them tiny WRC air boxes!).
utter and complete horse shite.
they are not further ahead of us at all, not by a long shot.
maybe a few years ago, but not anymore.
and their small filters are SHIT.
they all use metal inlet pipes as the filters are SO restrictive at decent power a rubber one will be sucked shut.
hence why they remove their filters for dragging and racing.
i know its a fact as ive seen a 600bhp Saff racer on the RR with the biggest blitz cone they do, and the rubber hose sucked shut and stalled as it came on big boost.
re-fitted the biggest K+N one and it was perfectly fine again.
and on the ROAD (not rollers), esp on turbo cars, cones dont make much higer charge temps than boxes.
and no restriction is more important than charge temps (take note big power oweners with them tiny WRC air boxes!).
Originally Posted by zippyobrien
jap ones are usually quite small, and we all no there further ahead than us
they are not further ahead of us at all, not by a long shot.
maybe a few years ago, but not anymore.
and their small filters are SHIT.
they all use metal inlet pipes as the filters are SO restrictive at decent power a rubber one will be sucked shut.
hence why they remove their filters for dragging and racing.
i know its a fact as ive seen a 600bhp Saff racer on the RR with the biggest blitz cone they do, and the rubber hose sucked shut and stalled as it came on big boost.
re-fitted the biggest K+N one and it was perfectly fine again.
#9
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: crewe,cheshire
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Rick
K&N have been doing it for decades, they flow and they last - why use anything else?
#17
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in the nite garden
Posts: 5,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick
K&N have been doing it for decades, they flow and they last - why use anything else?
#18
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vikingboy
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Rick
K&N have been doing it for decades, they flow and they last - why use anything else?
i guess its also down to personal preference..
#19
Originally Posted by Cosworth Rallyesport
Originally Posted by Rick
K&N have been doing it for decades, they flow and they last - why use anything else?
And a lot of the design, is dictated by the space it has to fit in, not to do with airflow ability.
K&N's work...doesnt matter if some people dont like them, they still work.
and with a forced induction car, you really dont need a huge filter.
K&N rate their filters at something like 1.8x the n/a rating for FI.
So a 500 n/a bhp filter will cope with 900bhp without much difficulty.
Id be more concerned with a reliable filter, that actually filters. Most of the big names will be reasonably good in terms of performance.
or std airbox modified for a little easier airflow.
#20
Testing the future
Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Originally Posted by Cosworth Rallyesport
Originally Posted by Rick
K&N have been doing it for decades, they flow and they last - why use anything else?
And a lot of the design, is dictated by the space it has to fit in, not to do with airflow ability.
#21
Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Originally Posted by Cosworth Rallyesport
Originally Posted by Rick
K&N have been doing it for decades, they flow and they last - why use anything else?
And a lot of the design, is dictated by the space it has to fit in, not to do with airflow ability.
Just need a new pipe now
#22
Happily retired
Re: Cone filters BIG or small !!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by costina
Whats better for power torque acc etc
I,ve a small ish one (no jokes please )
I,ve a small ish one (no jokes please )
#24
Testing the future
the type of thing that rod has is even better than the airbox with k&n panel as he has the best of both worlds - a cone inside a box that does not suck in hot air
#25
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Originally Posted by Cosworth Rallyesport
cone filters are for boy racers.
Originally Posted by Stavros
bigger is better, its purely a restriction thing,
and on the ROAD (not rollers), esp on turbo cars, cones dont make much higer charge temps than boxes.
and no restriction is more important than charge temps (take note big power oweners with them tiny WRC air boxes!).
and on the ROAD (not rollers), esp on turbo cars, cones dont make much higer charge temps than boxes.
and no restriction is more important than charge temps (take note big power oweners with them tiny WRC air boxes!).
I have always said that on the ROAD with some good cold air ducting an cone filter is MUCH better. In fact I ran a temp probe in one of my cars(NA not boosted) and yes sitting in a traffic jam it was hot, but about 30 seconds after moving again the temps dropped. Always ran about 5-7degrees above an ambient temp probe sitting out at front bumper and I am sure the increased flow was worth that.
#26
Testing the future
Originally Posted by Barry_GTi
Originally Posted by Cosworth Rallyesport
cone filters are for boy racers.
#27
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
I agree but a good direct air feed wouldn't be much different.
When I was about 18 I actually sealed a Pipercross cone filter in an alloy box and ran 2 HUGE air hoses to it from the front grill, now that worked REALLY well, but for the effort...... well I never built another hahaha..... I just ran the air feeds towards the filter.
When I was about 18 I actually sealed a Pipercross cone filter in an alloy box and ran 2 HUGE air hoses to it from the front grill, now that worked REALLY well, but for the effort...... well I never built another hahaha..... I just ran the air feeds towards the filter.
#28
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Yes, I agree that on the ROAD, you won't have problems with a cone filter and high temps with OCCASIONAL squirts of the throttle. But transfer that to track conditions where you're on the throttle CONSTANTLY, and you're talking a WHOLE different kettle of tuna . The engine bay then EASILY goes over 70°C, and so the filter is sucking in that hot air.
Rod understands these things FULLY, and the ONLY reason he has HAD to go to that filter is that the standard airbox becomes restrictive after 500bhp, so he had no choice but to go to a filter that could flow enough air. Funnily enough, he has completely screened off the filter in a custom box, making it just a larger version of the OE set-up. Now obviously being the bufty he is, he did it for no other reason than because it looked good .
Regarding the comments about standard airboxes, this might be true of NORMAL cars, but the Cosworth was originally designed for homologation so maximum flow WAS a big consideration. Obviously on today's shopping trollies, it is highly unlikely that this is even considered at all . Therefore the OE Cosworth airbox is a VERY good design and should not be replaced below 500bhp (IMO) .
Rod understands these things FULLY, and the ONLY reason he has HAD to go to that filter is that the standard airbox becomes restrictive after 500bhp, so he had no choice but to go to a filter that could flow enough air. Funnily enough, he has completely screened off the filter in a custom box, making it just a larger version of the OE set-up. Now obviously being the bufty he is, he did it for no other reason than because it looked good .
Regarding the comments about standard airboxes, this might be true of NORMAL cars, but the Cosworth was originally designed for homologation so maximum flow WAS a big consideration. Obviously on today's shopping trollies, it is highly unlikely that this is even considered at all . Therefore the OE Cosworth airbox is a VERY good design and should not be replaced below 500bhp (IMO) .
#29
Testing the future
Originally Posted by Barry_GTi
I agree but a good direct air feed wouldn't be much different.
how do you make sure that the cold air feed goes all around the cone? put the cone in a box and you're back to where we started.
i think we're basically arguing the same point, but the definition is slightly different
i fully agree with Mike on this one. he has experience and knowledge of different arrangements, and i have many years experience working in a climatic wind tunnel with measuring under bonnet temperatures
#30
15K+ Super Poster!!
Mike, i ca assure you that that where the filter is located (on a lowly S2, not Cos) the air does not approach that temperature. I've monitored temperatures on a stationary car at different points in the engine bay, and even then the temp at the front by the headlights/grill does not rise that much. Temperatures in other parts of the bay do rise significantly ,and cool less when moving too. As soon as you move, the filter is being blasted with outside air - the temperature in the engine is of little relevance.
With regard to why std cars use an airbox - this is down to practicality and noise issues, not performance..
With regard to why std cars use an airbox - this is down to practicality and noise issues, not performance..
#32
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Rick
Mike, i ca assure you that that where the filter is located (on a lowly S2, not Cos) the air does not approach that temperature. I've monitored temperatures on a stationary car at different points in the engine bay, and even then the temp at the front by the headlights/grill does not rise that much. Temperatures in other parts of the bay do rise significantly ,and cool less when moving too. As soon as you move, the filter is being blasted with outside air - the temperature in the engine is of little relevance.
With regard to why std cars use an airbox - this is down to practicality and noise issues, not performance..
With regard to why std cars use an airbox - this is down to practicality and noise issues, not performance..
On the road, these are insignificant, but on the track when the EGTs are 800-900° due to constantly being on the throttle, the radiated heat is absolutely immense, and I can assure you, a cone filter is just sucking all this in, due to it's close proximity to the exhaust manifold (several inches).
#33
Re: Cone filters BIG or small !!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by MadRod
Originally Posted by costina
Whats better for power torque acc etc
I,ve a small ish one (no jokes please )
I,ve a small ish one (no jokes please )
I've decided to go with the std box and K&N panel for my 330 ish bhp saff
As for the cortina i can only use a small cone due to space how cwill this affect power torque as i'm aiming for around 400 bhp not massive power but more than enough for now
Mike whats your view
cheers
Paul
#36
Originally Posted by Franco
Martin's must be another good location through surely? He doesnt seem to have heat soak issues on track?
Damn, him and Porkie coppied me
Some lead..............others follow
#39
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never cleaned mine once!
Oh and it was driven in ALL conditions! The engine was the only thing NOT to break on that car Paul will back me up!
I had to clean it when i gave it to Bentley (SOYS) missus, took me about 3 days
Oh and it was driven in ALL conditions! The engine was the only thing NOT to break on that car Paul will back me up!
I had to clean it when i gave it to Bentley (SOYS) missus, took me about 3 days
#40
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
That's a SHIT place to run an air filter . Just think of all the road grime that will pick up there - it must need cleaning every month .
Regardless of where they are fitted, many peeps dont clean & oil their K & N's often enough. Worth noting that they dont work very well unless oiled up correctly .