General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Who has experienced fooked manifolds from heat wrapping them

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2007, 10:28 AM
  #1  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
Thread Starter
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Who has experienced fooked manifolds from heat wrapping them

I know the story always has been not to heat wrap turbo exhaust manifolds and turbine housings as they crack/melt, but who has experienced that?

Just wondering if its as realistic as "run without a dumpvalve and your turbo dies really quick".

See a lot of foriegn turbo cars running them with seemingly no issue

I do know personally of one car that fucked the manifold because of it, but only one.
Old 11-05-2007, 10:31 AM
  #2  
jr
Advanced PassionFord User
 
jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dartford, Kent
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive seen a few downpipes that have failed because of cracks that was put down to the wrapping itself
Old 11-05-2007, 10:37 AM
  #3  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
Thread Starter
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I was always under the impression downpipes were safe, lol, ive always wrapped downpipes, my cossie one was wrapped and never failed even with antilag!
Old 11-05-2007, 10:37 AM
  #4  
nilrem
STOP!... Carry on
 
nilrem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not seen one... it could just be the same a s the DV issue... that it wont make a big difference until you are running high boost on a high performance engine... and then i bet its only in race situations, like rally or something
Old 11-05-2007, 11:16 AM
  #5  
jr
Advanced PassionFord User
 
jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dartford, Kent
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stavros
I was always under the impression downpipes were safe, lol, ive always wrapped downpipes, my cossie one was wrapped and never failed even with antilag!
proberly so many factors in why some are fine and some arent, both ones ive seen fo were on high power s2's not that that really matters
Old 11-05-2007, 11:49 AM
  #6  
Hardeep_Singh
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Hardeep_Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my old turbo housing, manifold, and downpipe were all wrapped and there been occasions when i have ripped the motor so hard all the above have glowd red hot and i have never had any cracks appear!
Old 11-05-2007, 11:58 AM
  #7  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
Thread Starter
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Hardeep_Singh
my old turbo housing, manifold, and downpipe were all wrapped and there been occasions when i have ripped the motor so hard all the above have glowd red hot and i have never had any cracks appear!


The driftworks S14a is a good example too, just like yours, all wrapped, running about 450bhp and abuse much harder than 99% of cars on here im sure, and never had a problem at all.

Also running about 1.5bar on a GT3071R with no dumpvalve either and had no issues with that breaking either.

Seems to me its worth a try.
Old 11-05-2007, 01:29 PM
  #8  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

For me, it's about maximising reliability. I woud not run a t34 at 2 bar without a dumpvalve, the shock loadings CANNOT be doing it any good, Sticker Paul snapped a shaft on his recently - would that have happened with some way to release the pressure?

Hot manifolds are bad, they are more prone to cracking than when run cooler. Not to mention the increased EGT's with the additional loading on the exhaust valve and piston that this brings. So, if you know it's bad - why do it?

In competition, every last half a hp counts, and there are arguments to say that the increased energy in the exhaust will spin up the turbo faster etc - but 99% aren't in competition, and want to have fun.

It's all very well saying "i ran it on mine and it was ok" - but that proves nothing. Take 100 cars with wrapped manifolds, and 100 without, run them for 100k miles and study the results - that should tell you something. That isn't practical though, so the next best thing i to rely on science theory to guide us - u'd be foolish to go against it IMVHO.
Old 11-05-2007, 01:42 PM
  #9  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
Thread Starter
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

But what about the improvment in spoolup, exhaust gas extraction, etc etc etc a more efficient (ie heat wrapped) exhaust side will give?

What about the differences not having all the heat radiated into the other parts of the engine (head especially) will give?

IIRC even rod commented that just his turbine housing blanket made a noticable difference.

There 2 sides to the argument.
Old 11-05-2007, 01:51 PM
  #10  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would have thought that the science behind it would be that the turbine is driven by the kinetic energy of the exhaust gases. Losing any of that energy by letting it heat up the atmosphere will loose performance.

So on a purely performance point of view it is best to keep as much heat within that manifold as possible.

The only thing that limits this is the properties of the materials available.

The construction method of your manifold will also come under particular questioning. If it is a fabricated item things like post weld heat treatment and careful fabrication in the first place can help prevent cracking. I find sometimes you can predict the way a manifold will grow/expand and make allowances for it in the design.
Old 11-05-2007, 01:58 PM
  #11  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Less heat is radiated, and this is a big plus - i am REALLY tempted to wrap mine because of how close it is to the radiator, plug leads, water hose..

Forget about radiating heat into the head - the manifold is bolted to the head - and when wrapped is much hotter - far more heat is transferred by conduction than by radiation - hence the head temperature is increased with a wrapped manifold, along with EGT's. Std ford turbo manifolds have high nickel content in them - i wouldnt be worried about them cracking, for me the danger is increased thermal loadings on the head/valve/piston/plug. With tubular steel, which is very thin, then the cracking risk is much greater.

I don't doubt that wrapping will help spool up - my own car after being driven hard for a couple of minutes and the turbo is beginning to glow, that it spools up noticeably faster. Less energy is now lost from the gas and so helps drive the turbo. However, reliability is no1 for me, and would rather prolong engine and turbo life rather than have that extra edge. If i was competing then things are totally different, pushing things to the limit with big budgets needed.

In the end, u have to decide for yourself if it's worth it to you.
Old 11-05-2007, 02:02 PM
  #12  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
Thread Starter
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Theres no denying there is more stress on certain components.

But like with dumpvalves and fookin countless other mods people reccomend or shy away from, theory and reality are two different things.

Ie without a DV causes more stress and load, but the odds of one failing because of no DV is still absolutley tiny compared to what it seems on paper.

And it may be the same in this case too.

Hence me asking this question about people EXPERIENCE in it, rather than asking their opinions on the theory of it....
Old 11-05-2007, 02:02 PM
  #13  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I would have thought that the science behind it would be that the turbine is driven by the kinetic energy of the exhaust gases. Losing any of that energy by letting it heat up the atmosphere will loose performance.
Yea, there is no argument there at all - wrapping will help spool up. The question is - are you willing to accept the incrased risks to reliability that this brings?
Old 11-05-2007, 02:03 PM
  #14  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
Thread Starter
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Rick
I would have thought that the science behind it would be that the turbine is driven by the kinetic energy of the exhaust gases. Losing any of that energy by letting it heat up the atmosphere will loose performance.
Yea, there is no argument there at all - wrapping will help spool up. The question is - are you willing to accept the incrased risks to reliability that this brings?
see above tho. HOW much? we dont know.

hence why i DIDNT ask for an argument in the theory of this, just experience of this, as theory means fuck all in cars, we all mustve realised that by now.
Old 11-05-2007, 02:09 PM
  #15  
Butch.
PassionFord Post Troll

iTrader: (1)
 
Butch.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i had a cossie which had the manifold and turbo wrapped with heat wrap and it use to smoke on over run quite badly then i removed the heat wrap it was fine didnt smoke on over run.............
Old 11-05-2007, 02:10 PM
  #16  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Steve, i realise you are asking about experience, but I really dont think this is going to tell you anything - as there are far too few people to be able to draw any kind of conclusion.

I set up an RST the other week with a heat wrapped manifold - the car is totally std though, runs 11.5:1 at 7psi - that car is never going to melt. So if he came on here, and said "yea, im wrapped, never had a prob" - what use is it? Not a lot. Ok, thats an extreme example, but in order for statistics to help you with an engineering matter - you need a lot of them - and we have got maybe a handful....
Old 11-05-2007, 02:13 PM
  #17  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
Thread Starter
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Its not going to tell me a lot.

But IMO a lot more than theory ever will.
Old 11-05-2007, 02:16 PM
  #18  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stavros
Originally Posted by Rick
I would have thought that the science behind it would be that the turbine is driven by the kinetic energy of the exhaust gases. Losing any of that energy by letting it heat up the atmosphere will loose performance.
Yea, there is no argument there at all - wrapping will help spool up. The question is - are you willing to accept the incrased risks to reliability that this brings?
see above tho. HOW much? we dont know.

hence why i DIDNT ask for an argument in the theory of this, just experience of this, as theory means fuck all in cars, we all mustve realised that by now.

We DON'T know - i totally agree. Theory DOES mean a lot - it's just how you apply it, very few people are skilled enough in the field to apply it properly. I'm with you thought that tests tests tests is what counts - it's just no way i can afford to do it! So rather than relying on half baked experiences, i try and use the theory as best i can - unless something is obvious - ie EVRERYONE runs their t4 of the compressor map - but they still seem to hold together...
Old 11-05-2007, 02:21 PM
  #19  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
Thread Starter
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Rick
ie EVRERYONE runs their t4 of the compressor map - but they still seem to hold together...
exactly mate, there is SO much that people say not to do, what in internet typing and looking at it seems absolute madness, but in reality the downsides of it are incredibly small compared to how they seem.

T4s at mega boost, the destructive abilites of ALS, the destructive abilites of no DV, cone filters sucking in hot air (NOT on rollers!), not running water cooling on turbos (on that note, there a LOT of GT series turbos running with no DV or water cooling, both are seemingly madness, but no harm yet, and its been a few years...), and quite possibly, the heat wrapping thing too.

All of these things shorten lives, but usually something more fundamental and common has made the item break way before these things fuck it!
Old 11-05-2007, 02:28 PM
  #20  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

When i get my own Dyno farm we'll put all this to the test - 10 engines with wrap, 10 without - all running 40psi on a t3

Thing is, at the mo i insist on driving a 15 year old escort, and if it doesn't get me to my finals on tuesday morning, i'm screwed
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nicodinho
Ford Non RS / XR / ST parts for sale.
6
07-10-2015 12:56 PM
Fordmad!
General Car Related Discussion.
5
29-09-2015 07:03 PM
caprixpack
General Car Related Discussion.
0
25-09-2015 07:53 PM



Quick Reply: Who has experienced fooked manifolds from heat wrapping them



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 PM.