how good are xr4x4 estates?
#1
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: crewe,cheshire
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
been having a little think,and i fancy a 4x4 estate as a runaround
are they any good?
what do they fetch at the mo,i am not after a minter,just a daily runner that i can chuck shit in the back and not worry about it.
are they in 2.8 and 2.9
i take it the 2.9 is better,24v even more so?
cheers
dave
are they any good?
what do they fetch at the mo,i am not after a minter,just a daily runner that i can chuck shit in the back and not worry about it.
are they in 2.8 and 2.9
i take it the 2.9 is better,24v even more so?
cheers
dave
#3
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
they were mostly available as an 89 spec 2.9 and range from between a £100 snotter to around £600 for a good un
they need better brakes and the gearbox is a bit crap and exhausts are well expensive, but other than that they are fine
go and find a 90/91 car if you can and they are good fun, the surprise element in them is unreal when you pull up next to a chav and waste them![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
avoid the cat versions as they have hydraulic tappets which tedn to be fooked most of the time
clutches are a bitch to change too now i think about it![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
rear suspension is limited to the 2.9 estate only, the dohc ones are different with different spirngs too but a very nice and tourquey engine makes them a hoon to drive
they need better brakes and the gearbox is a bit crap and exhausts are well expensive, but other than that they are fine
go and find a 90/91 car if you can and they are good fun, the surprise element in them is unreal when you pull up next to a chav and waste them
![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
avoid the cat versions as they have hydraulic tappets which tedn to be fooked most of the time
clutches are a bitch to change too now i think about it
![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
rear suspension is limited to the 2.9 estate only, the dohc ones are different with different spirngs too but a very nice and tourquey engine makes them a hoon to drive
![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: crewe,cheshire
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
so a 2 litre 1 is worth considering?
i always thought the 2 litre was very under powered for a 4x4
you live and learn
can you get many toys on them,eg electric windows allround,air-con,cruise,abs etc
thanks for all the help lads
dave
i always thought the 2 litre was very under powered for a 4x4
you live and learn
![Banana](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/banana_dance.gif)
can you get many toys on them,eg electric windows allround,air-con,cruise,abs etc
thanks for all the help lads
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
dave
#9
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
2 ltr engine is garbage imo.
as for toys get a late spec ghia with air con, ew x4, eleccy mirrors eleccy sunroof power steering abs as standard.
not sure on the cruise control but i dont think so
as for toys get a late spec ghia with air con, ew x4, eleccy mirrors eleccy sunroof power steering abs as standard.
not sure on the cruise control but i dont think so
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#10
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I bought a 2 litre ghia 4x4 h plate for £350 with 12 months mot - used it as a mobile skip/van for nearly 2 years until the rot set in, didnt spend a bean on it in that time, then stripped out the 3.9 diffs and a load of other bits that were the same spec as a 4x4 cosworth - ebayed them and got £650 back and the local scrappy gave me £50 for the carcass
It pulled well with nearly a ton of old bricks chucked inside on the way to the local tip one time
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
It pulled well with nearly a ton of old bricks chucked inside on the way to the local tip one time
#11
C.R.E.A.M.
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
2 litre dohc is tbh a bit pony, i have had good ones but feel
because of bad experiances with them, its just waiting to throw its
hand in,what about a td scorpio estate, they will do big miles no probs.
i have a 24v vectra sri estate v reg, irmscher kit,lovely motor
and it will pull a rally car etc no probs.
last owner paid 14 grand
because of bad experiances with them, its just waiting to throw its
hand in,what about a td scorpio estate, they will do big miles no probs.
i have a 24v vectra sri estate v reg, irmscher kit,lovely motor
and it will pull a rally car etc no probs.
last owner paid 14 grand
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
#16
C.R.E.A.M.
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
when i said the heads go,i didn't mean as in headgaskets,
its the heads cracking,and i have seen many a good or they thought
they were good mechanic,fix one thinking it was the gasket, when
it was the head cracking, do the job a few times etc etc
bill the customer,then call them 5hit.
the 2.9 is the best one as they are reliable,mine have never
let me down when i have had one.
its the heads cracking,and i have seen many a good or they thought
they were good mechanic,fix one thinking it was the gasket, when
it was the head cracking, do the job a few times etc etc
bill the customer,then call them 5hit.
the 2.9 is the best one as they are reliable,mine have never
let me down when i have had one.
#19
20K+ Super Poster.
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
no real reason not to drop a 24v in
theyre quicker, drive nicer etc.
they also use LESS fuel!
can do a 24v conversion for peanuts
theyre quicker, drive nicer etc.
they also use LESS fuel!
can do a 24v conversion for peanuts
#23
C.R.E.A.M.
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Jim Galbally
no real reason not to drop a 24v in
theyre quicker, drive nicer etc.
they also use LESS fuel!
can do a 24v conversion for peanuts
theyre quicker, drive nicer etc.
they also use LESS fuel!
can do a 24v conversion for peanuts
calling me a iratating cnut etc, i thought it was a great idea.
the last xr4x4 2.0 i had was a j plate and was a lovely old car
it was owned by a ford technician,was sad to see it go
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
#25
ELASTIC BAND
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
had a 2.0 twin cam, rwd, not much in it with a 2.9 4x4, both great engines, as in pretty solid, abused both for many miles.
with the 2.9 went the 4x4 24v route, abused that too, without any serious issues, worth the time of convertion it for the extra 50bhp and 5-10mpg more!
with the 2.9 went the 4x4 24v route, abused that too, without any serious issues, worth the time of convertion it for the extra 50bhp and 5-10mpg more!
#26
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Haggis Hunting
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 20 twin cam seemed to go better, for some reason, better revving? Better engine braking on the diffs? Whatever u get, it will be 10 times the value for money ratio, just keep it sideways lol
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#33
Fast Ford snapper
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Love it!
Quite fancy a Cossie style Sierra estate for lugging gear about, would probably have to be a 4 pot or oil burner for economy's sake though.
The V6's must get piss poor MPG with the weight of the body and that transmission.... Especially the MFi 2.8
![Smokin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smokin.gif)
Quite fancy a Cossie style Sierra estate for lugging gear about, would probably have to be a 4 pot or oil burner for economy's sake though.
The V6's must get piss poor MPG with the weight of the body and that transmission.... Especially the MFi 2.8
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
#34
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Ade
Love it!
Quite fancy a Cossie style Sierra estate for lugging gear about, would probably have to be a 4 pot or oil burner for economy's sake though.
The V6's must get piss poor MPG with the weight of the body and that transmission.... Especially the MFi 2.8![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Smokin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smokin.gif)
Quite fancy a Cossie style Sierra estate for lugging gear about, would probably have to be a 4 pot or oil burner for economy's sake though.
The V6's must get piss poor MPG with the weight of the body and that transmission.... Especially the MFi 2.8
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Sad](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
what was more scarey was the fact that the trip computer would sometimes read 0 mpg when i was giving it beans and never went above 13 mpg, even when i was crusing, downhill with teh throttle up it would sometimes see 19 mpg too
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
#35
Fast Ford snapper
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by dojj
Originally Posted by Ade
Love it!
Quite fancy a Cossie style Sierra estate for lugging gear about, would probably have to be a 4 pot or oil burner for economy's sake though.
The V6's must get piss poor MPG with the weight of the body and that transmission.... Especially the MFi 2.8![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Smokin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smokin.gif)
Quite fancy a Cossie style Sierra estate for lugging gear about, would probably have to be a 4 pot or oil burner for economy's sake though.
The V6's must get piss poor MPG with the weight of the body and that transmission.... Especially the MFi 2.8
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Sad](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
what was more scarey was the fact that the trip computer would sometimes read 0 mpg when i was giving it beans and never went above 13 mpg, even when i was crusing, downhill with the throttle up it would sometimes see 19 mpg too
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
I know folk who cruise about gently in 2.8i Capris who get under 20MPG, so add weight, transmission and add a driving style more like mine and its getting nasty
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
#37
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've got one aswell!
2.0 4x4 1992 in blue, and for what i paid its been a good car, head gasket i've done, put a starter motor on it, ford only part about £160, the headlining sags a bit, apparently they all do this?
all other repairs have been self inflicted
have achieved about 38mpg when on a run and about 28mpg around town.
Handles like a barge though, i've fitted poly front arb doughnuts which improved big time no rear arb though and you can feel it
Will go sideways though in the right conditions i.e. wet.
i'd love to try a 2.9 sometime as i bet they're a bit of a laugh, although might be hard finding a straight one these days.
2.0 4x4 1992 in blue, and for what i paid its been a good car, head gasket i've done, put a starter motor on it, ford only part about £160, the headlining sags a bit, apparently they all do this?
all other repairs have been self inflicted
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
have achieved about 38mpg when on a run and about 28mpg around town.
Handles like a barge though, i've fitted poly front arb doughnuts which improved big time no rear arb though and you can feel it
![Confused](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Sad](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Will go sideways though in the right conditions i.e. wet.
i'd love to try a 2.9 sometime as i bet they're a bit of a laugh, although might be hard finding a straight one these days.
#38
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by James
I've got one aswell!
2.0 4x4 1992 in blue, and for what i paid its been a good car, head gasket i've done, put a starter motor on it, ford only part about £160, the headlining sags a bit, apparently they all do this?
2.0 4x4 1992 in blue, and for what i paid its been a good car, head gasket i've done, put a starter motor on it, ford only part about £160, the headlining sags a bit, apparently they all do this?
headlining hasn't been saggy in any of the probably 10 that have passed through my hands in the past few years
even this one drove fine for around 150 miles after it hit a cow
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
![](https://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m119/dojjindia/oops.jpg)