My grief with SCS and Harvey Gibbs
#41
Richie, i dont see any harm in posting them providing you post your emails and his emails in their complete form so that no "edited highlights" are posted that could be considered to be misleading.
#43
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like a nightmare and i feel for you bud if all true but...
agreeing to pay 8.5k for an engine in the first place
im running around in a 380 bhp engine (which hasnt missed a beat in 10k) for the cost of approx 2.5 k !!!
agreeing to pay 8.5k for an engine in the first place
im running around in a 380 bhp engine (which hasnt missed a beat in 10k) for the cost of approx 2.5 k !!!
#45
8.5K isnt actaully very expensive for a complete engine and turbo package when you dont have a suitable donor engine.
IIRC stu charges about 4K for a basic 400bhp style engine rebuild and thats based on a good donor and without a turbo being supplied.
IIRC stu charges about 4K for a basic 400bhp style engine rebuild and thats based on a good donor and without a turbo being supplied.
#46
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
You're all expecting me to back Harvey up, so here goes .
The main point that I would make, is that Doug is 100% correct when he states that the air injectors do not fail safe .
When the car was under Harvey's responsibility, he repaired it FOC (as you stated regarding the cam cap stud snapping etc).
However, for what-ever reason, the air injector wire was unplugged / came loose and this gives the car UNLIMITED boost, and the car was obviously run on the rollers like this and also for an unknown period of time before that (as it was only discovered by Ahmed) - incidentally, why did you take it to Ahmed, if the car was checked over and given a clean bill of health by EA? . Therefore, with no boost control it would have run lean and done the damage that you stated, but still run for a period of time like this.
When the car was brought to Harvey with the "death rattles", he carried out routine checks to see if anyone had been tampering with anything or if there was anything blatantly obviously wrong. A Pectel monitor was connected and it showed that the TP swicth was giving random readings and that the phase sensor had no signal (hence why on the invoice after the repair, they recommended that the loom be changed). They then checked the cam timing and it was discovered that the inlet cam was one tooth out (equivalent to the 18 degrees mentioned), and so this set alarm bells ringing that someone else had been tampering with the engine.
In view of this, can you please explain why any of you think Harvey should be responsible for the rebuild? The unlimited boost on it's own would be able to cause the issues, let alone the faulty TPS which is responsible for the full throttle enrichment.
Regarding the loom "looking" okay, you are joking aren't you? A loom can look 100% perfect and unless you have a Pectel monitor permanently connected, there is no point in commenting, as the sensors OFTEN develop random faults (sometimes even not materialising unless the car is fully loaded).
As to the mileage issue, you state that it has only been driven for 4000miles, yet when Ahmed gave it the check over, it had done 39k. When Harvey had it after the centre two pistons nipped up due to either lack of fuel (TPS) or too much boost (no boost control), it had 47,959 on the clock. Now even Phil could do the maths on that.....
Again, please explain how it can be Harvey's engine building skills being responsible for faulty loom / sensors / boost control?
I honestly feel for you, but you can't honestly attribute the above to shoddy workmanship on Harvey's behalf..... .
Doug,
I also note that you're happy to stick the boot in on Harvey, yet there is no mention of the reason why your car is currently off the road.... .
The main point that I would make, is that Doug is 100% correct when he states that the air injectors do not fail safe .
When the car was under Harvey's responsibility, he repaired it FOC (as you stated regarding the cam cap stud snapping etc).
However, for what-ever reason, the air injector wire was unplugged / came loose and this gives the car UNLIMITED boost, and the car was obviously run on the rollers like this and also for an unknown period of time before that (as it was only discovered by Ahmed) - incidentally, why did you take it to Ahmed, if the car was checked over and given a clean bill of health by EA? . Therefore, with no boost control it would have run lean and done the damage that you stated, but still run for a period of time like this.
When the car was brought to Harvey with the "death rattles", he carried out routine checks to see if anyone had been tampering with anything or if there was anything blatantly obviously wrong. A Pectel monitor was connected and it showed that the TP swicth was giving random readings and that the phase sensor had no signal (hence why on the invoice after the repair, they recommended that the loom be changed). They then checked the cam timing and it was discovered that the inlet cam was one tooth out (equivalent to the 18 degrees mentioned), and so this set alarm bells ringing that someone else had been tampering with the engine.
In view of this, can you please explain why any of you think Harvey should be responsible for the rebuild? The unlimited boost on it's own would be able to cause the issues, let alone the faulty TPS which is responsible for the full throttle enrichment.
Regarding the loom "looking" okay, you are joking aren't you? A loom can look 100% perfect and unless you have a Pectel monitor permanently connected, there is no point in commenting, as the sensors OFTEN develop random faults (sometimes even not materialising unless the car is fully loaded).
As to the mileage issue, you state that it has only been driven for 4000miles, yet when Ahmed gave it the check over, it had done 39k. When Harvey had it after the centre two pistons nipped up due to either lack of fuel (TPS) or too much boost (no boost control), it had 47,959 on the clock. Now even Phil could do the maths on that.....
Again, please explain how it can be Harvey's engine building skills being responsible for faulty loom / sensors / boost control?
I honestly feel for you, but you can't honestly attribute the above to shoddy workmanship on Harvey's behalf..... .
Doug,
I also note that you're happy to stick the boot in on Harvey, yet there is no mention of the reason why your car is currently off the road.... .
#50
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
You're all expecting me to back Harvey up, so here goes .
The main point that I would make, is that Doug is 100% correct when he states that the air injectors do not fail safe .
When the car was under Harvey's responsibility, he repaired it FOC (as you stated regarding the cam cap stud snapping etc).
However, for what-ever reason, the air injector wire was unplugged / came loose and this gives the car UNLIMITED boost, and the car was obviously run on the rollers like this and also for an unknown period of time before that (as it was only discovered by Ahmed) - incidentally, why did you take it to Ahmed, if the car was checked over and given a clean bill of health by EA? . Therefore, with no boost control it would have run lean and done the damage that you stated, but still run for a period of time like this.
When the car was brought to Harvey with the "death rattles", he carried out routine checks to see if anyone had been tampering with anything or if there was anything blatantly obviously wrong. A Pectel monitor was connected and it showed that the TP swicth was giving random readings and that the phase sensor had no signal (hence why on the invoice after the repair, they recommended that the loom be changed). They then checked the cam timing and it was discovered that the inlet cam was one tooth out (equivalent to the 18 degrees mentioned), and so this set alarm bells ringing that someone else had been tampering with the engine.
In view of this, can you please explain why any of you think Harvey should be responsible for the rebuild? The unlimited boost on it's own would be able to cause the issues, let alone the faulty TPS which is responsible for the full throttle enrichment.
Regarding the loom "looking" okay, you are joking aren't you? A loom can look 100% perfect and unless you have a Pectel monitor permanently connected, there is no point in commenting, as the sensors OFTEN develop random faults (sometimes even not materialising unless the car is fully loaded).
As to the mileage issue, you state that it has only been driven for 4000miles, yet when Ahmed gave it the check over, it had done 39k. When Harvey had it after the centre two pistons nipped up due to either lack of fuel (TPS) or too much boost (no boost control), it had 47,959 on the clock. Now even Phil could do the maths on that.....
Again, please explain how it can be Harvey's engine building skills being responsible for faulty loom / sensors / boost control?
I honestly feel for you, but you can't honestly attribute the above to shoddy workmanship on Harvey's behalf..... .
The main point that I would make, is that Doug is 100% correct when he states that the air injectors do not fail safe .
When the car was under Harvey's responsibility, he repaired it FOC (as you stated regarding the cam cap stud snapping etc).
However, for what-ever reason, the air injector wire was unplugged / came loose and this gives the car UNLIMITED boost, and the car was obviously run on the rollers like this and also for an unknown period of time before that (as it was only discovered by Ahmed) - incidentally, why did you take it to Ahmed, if the car was checked over and given a clean bill of health by EA? . Therefore, with no boost control it would have run lean and done the damage that you stated, but still run for a period of time like this.
When the car was brought to Harvey with the "death rattles", he carried out routine checks to see if anyone had been tampering with anything or if there was anything blatantly obviously wrong. A Pectel monitor was connected and it showed that the TP swicth was giving random readings and that the phase sensor had no signal (hence why on the invoice after the repair, they recommended that the loom be changed). They then checked the cam timing and it was discovered that the inlet cam was one tooth out (equivalent to the 18 degrees mentioned), and so this set alarm bells ringing that someone else had been tampering with the engine.
In view of this, can you please explain why any of you think Harvey should be responsible for the rebuild? The unlimited boost on it's own would be able to cause the issues, let alone the faulty TPS which is responsible for the full throttle enrichment.
Regarding the loom "looking" okay, you are joking aren't you? A loom can look 100% perfect and unless you have a Pectel monitor permanently connected, there is no point in commenting, as the sensors OFTEN develop random faults (sometimes even not materialising unless the car is fully loaded).
As to the mileage issue, you state that it has only been driven for 4000miles, yet when Ahmed gave it the check over, it had done 39k. When Harvey had it after the centre two pistons nipped up due to either lack of fuel (TPS) or too much boost (no boost control), it had 47,959 on the clock. Now even Phil could do the maths on that.....
Again, please explain how it can be Harvey's engine building skills being responsible for faulty loom / sensors / boost control?
I honestly feel for you, but you can't honestly attribute the above to shoddy workmanship on Harvey's behalf..... .
NO ONE HAS TAMPERED WITH THIS ENGINE, if i had been driving it so much on unlimited boost as you say, why would it no blow up then
He has layed the blame at 4 things now, and after finding one that may be plausible he has latched onto it for dear life...
So, can you tell me, when Ahmed mapped it, why would he say it was one of the best ones he has worked on, also please tell me why he didnt notice any det noises when mapping it, also tell me why he said all sensors were perfect and everything is functioning properly, also tell me why i had oil spouting out of everywhere, also tell me why my head gasket went, also tell me why the cap snapped.....i can go on
The car was taken to Ahmed for mapping as recommended by Harvey after i had paid the money for the engine, as, like i have mentioned i wanted to do things right, Harvey advised i get the fuelling checked and then get it mapped again, so thats what i did
With regards to the boost control, the car was NOT driven much at all and i go back to ask you about why Ahmed didnt notice anything and it was NOT run on the rollers with the wire disconnected otherwise im sure that Paul Hills' boost gauge would have indictated so and the thing would have blown up there and then.
After the head gasket had been done and the oil leak, a pectel monitor was put on it and everything was fine and still is now, how can my loom be so poor then , maybe thats a good excuse, why hasn't he sent my old pistons back as promised, covering something up ?
With regards to the cam timing being out, thats absolute bollox Mike, a locknut was changed as the one Harvey put on it nearly fell off...
Ahmed did mention the wire being loose, not a problem with that, but he also added the ENGINE HAD NOT BEEN AFFECTED IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM, the car was perfect after it left Ahmed and a few months AFTER being mapped it went belly up...
I could understand if i had 1 problem, but i have had 3 !!! thats not a coincidence is it !!
#52
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sudbury Suffolk, Drives: Octavia VRS & XR2i 1800 Zetec track car
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last for a 'good while' for Ł8.5k! I'd like it to be strong as an ox for a lot longer than a good while (taking into account the higher the bhp the less the reliability, but surely just over 400bhp isn't major engine stress)
I think the majority of people would expect it to be 100% for that kind of money - although if you pay for a service however much or little it should be done to correctly. Yes there are always problems with tuning, but its not as if this was a development bespoke build.
I personallly have only every good things about SCS so this is surprising. You have to trust experts and expect the very best service
Saying all this, I'm not 100% understanding the whole chain of events, SCS didn't actually fit the engine? How would a cam cap break, one of those things? Who would've checked over this air injector thing? I know nothing about it.
Z
I think the majority of people would expect it to be 100% for that kind of money - although if you pay for a service however much or little it should be done to correctly. Yes there are always problems with tuning, but its not as if this was a development bespoke build.
I personallly have only every good things about SCS so this is surprising. You have to trust experts and expect the very best service
Saying all this, I'm not 100% understanding the whole chain of events, SCS didn't actually fit the engine? How would a cam cap break, one of those things? Who would've checked over this air injector thing? I know nothing about it.
Z
#53
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hartlepool
Posts: 10,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
imo i would expect to get a warrenty on an 8.k engine the least he could of done was give the bloke a discount when all 4 pistons had to be changed or even not charged for labour that is just shocking if you ask me.And i would expect the pistons back so i could actually see the supposed damage myself. and then even after second set of pistons were put in the fookin headgasket went no look at all not supprised he didnt take it back to harvey and got someone else to do it. But end of the day there is always 2 sides to a story.
#54
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: wilts.
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the tea and biscuits are out.
this is gonna be a longer
sorry to hear this richie. 11k for an engine is a fooking lot of money, could have bought a whole escos for that
this is gonna be a longer
sorry to hear this richie. 11k for an engine is a fooking lot of money, could have bought a whole escos for that
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
My 470BHP conversion was about 10k and that also includes the Autronic and Turbo it done nearly 20k miles and never skipped a beat apart from coil pack issues and that got sorted....Now it in another car and l belive the customer is well happy.
Also mark gave me back any parts that l could sell aswell
While l had it it was well used just ask some of the members on here who got a ride in her
Also mark gave me back any parts that l could sell aswell
While l had it it was well used just ask some of the members on here who got a ride in her
#56
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are a few things that Mike has written that aren't quite right, he is hearing EVERYTHING second hand and while i appreciate he is sticking up for someone he works with / bums etc, the events which took place haven't quite happened in the sequence he stated.
#57
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mate I told you, shame thing happened to me with Spades old engine, Harvey's customer service seems to stop @ mike and his regulars it seems
My car when it left Harvey and it was a timebomb waiting to happen, and after i paid him he had no interest in sorting it out even tho i had just spend 20K with him
My car when it left Harvey and it was a timebomb waiting to happen, and after i paid him he had no interest in sorting it out even tho i had just spend 20K with him
#60
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oop Norf
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think all you folk who think Ł8.5k should get you a bulletproof engine are dreaming.. a 400 or 500bhp cossie is effectively a RACE ENGINE.. it will not be bulletproof.. but if built professionally (like SCS) it should last maybe 2 or 3 race seasons most.. how that equates to general road usage, is almost impossible to calculate!
#62
PassionFord Post Whore!!
My two penneth would be, if someone is spending Ł8500 on an engine build I would expect the builder to replace ALL the engine sensors for peice of mind.
If he did then they are all under his warranty.
If he didnt then its slightly un-professional, especially when the customer is spending sooo much money.
If he did then they are all under his warranty.
If he didnt then its slightly un-professional, especially when the customer is spending sooo much money.
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by reality
I think all you folk who think Ł8.5k should get you a bulletproof engine are dreaming.. a 400 or 500bhp cossie is effectively a RACE ENGINE.. it will not be bulletproof.. but if built professionally (like SCS) it should last maybe 2 or 3 race seasons most.. how that equates to general road usage, is almost impossible to calculate!
My old 470bhp engine is still going ok and thats over 2 years old with over 20k on it
#64
Originally Posted by neilm
My two penneth would be, if someone is spending Ł8500 on an engine build I would expect the builder to replace ALL the engine sensors for peice of mind.
If he did then they are all under his warranty.
If he didnt then its slightly un-professional, especially when the customer is spending sooo much money.
If he did then they are all under his warranty.
If he didnt then its slightly un-professional, especially when the customer is spending sooo much money.
#65
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by angel45
Mate I told you, shame thing happened to me with Spades old engine, Harvey's customer service seems to stop @ mike and his regulars it seems
My car when it left Harvey and it was a timebomb waiting to happen, and after i paid him he had no interest in sorting it out even tho i had just spend 20K with him
My car when it left Harvey and it was a timebomb waiting to happen, and after i paid him he had no interest in sorting it out even tho i had just spend 20K with him
#66
Is replacing the sensors not part of the INSTALATION of the engine though?
Thats the point i would expect them to be replaced, or did harvey give it back to you build up fully with the manifolds on etc already?
(ive never bought an engien from harvey so i dont know how it arrives)
Thats the point i would expect them to be replaced, or did harvey give it back to you build up fully with the manifolds on etc already?
(ive never bought an engien from harvey so i dont know how it arrives)
#67
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oop Norf
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MAD YUM
Originally Posted by reality
I think all you folk who think Ł8.5k should get you a bulletproof engine are dreaming.. a 400 or 500bhp cossie is effectively a RACE ENGINE.. it will not be bulletproof.. but if built professionally (like SCS) it should last maybe 2 or 3 race seasons most.. how that equates to general road usage, is almost impossible to calculate!
My old 470bhp engine is still going ok and thats over 2 years old with over 20k on it
#68
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Is replacing the sensors not part of the INSTALATION of the engine though?
Thats the point i would expect them to be replaced, or did harvey give it back to you build up fully with the manifolds on etc already?
(ive never bought an engien from harvey so i dont know how it arrives)
Thats the point i would expect them to be replaced, or did harvey give it back to you build up fully with the manifolds on etc already?
(ive never bought an engien from harvey so i dont know how it arrives)
#70
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oop Norf
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So ultimately what this is boiling down to is not mechanical work, but a possible electrical fault.. It is very possible for a sensor to fail 5 miles down the road, let alone 4000 miles down the road ya know..
#71
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lambchop
Originally Posted by angel45
even tho i had just spend 20K with him
was that a whole car?
#72
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Richie Russ
Your joking arent you !!
NO ONE HAS TAMPERED WITH THIS ENGINE, if i had been driving it so much on unlimited boost as you say, why would it no blow up then
NO ONE HAS TAMPERED WITH THIS ENGINE, if i had been driving it so much on unlimited boost as you say, why would it no blow up then
Originally Posted by Richie Russ
He has layed the blame at 4 things now, and after finding one that may be plausible he has latched onto it for dear life...
So, can you tell me, when Ahmed mapped it, why would he say it was one of the best ones he has worked on, also please tell me why he didnt notice any det noises when mapping it, also tell me why he said all sensors were perfect and everything is functioning properly, also tell me why i had oil spouting out of everywhere, also tell me why my head gasket went, also tell me why the cap snapped.....i can go on
So, can you tell me, when Ahmed mapped it, why would he say it was one of the best ones he has worked on, also please tell me why he didnt notice any det noises when mapping it, also tell me why he said all sensors were perfect and everything is functioning properly, also tell me why i had oil spouting out of everywhere, also tell me why my head gasket went, also tell me why the cap snapped.....i can go on
Originally Posted by Richie Russ
The car was taken to Ahmed for mapping as recommended by Harvey after i had paid the money for the engine, as, like i have mentioned i wanted to do things right, Harvey advised i get the fuelling checked and then get it mapped again, so thats what i did
Originally Posted by Richie Russ
With regards to the boost control, the car was NOT driven much at all and i go back to ask you about why Ahmed didnt notice anything and it was NOT run on the rollers with the wire disconnected otherwise im sure that Paul Hills' boost gauge would have indictated so and the thing would have blown up there and then.
Originally Posted by Richie Russ
After the head gasket had been done and the oil leak, a pectel monitor was put on it and everything was fine and still is now, how can my loom be so poor then , maybe thats a good excuse, why hasn't he sent my old pistons back as promised, covering something up ?
Originally Posted by Richie Russ
With regards to the cam timing being out, thats absolute bollox Mike, a locknut was changed as the one Harvey put on it nearly fell off...
Originally Posted by Richie Russ
Ahmed did mention the wire being loose, not a problem with that, but he also added the ENGINE HAD NOT BEEN AFFECTED IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM, the car was perfect after it left Ahmed and a few months AFTER being mapped it went belly up...
Originally Posted by Richie Russ
I could understand if i had 1 problem, but i have had 3 !!! thats not a coincidence is it !!
Also regarding the supposed head-gasket failure on you way home, I am confused about that, as you said that Harvey didn;t have time to change your bearings OR your brake discs, and he also refused to road test it hard until the loom issue was addressed, how the hell did YOU drive it hard enough to get a WRC gasket to fail without doing ANY other damage to a freshly built engine?
#76
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel filter srapped to my anti roll bar (via 1 cable tie)and lots more i wounldn't even piss on the cunt if he was on fire imo [/quote]
Dean told me about this when he had your car in
Thats top service for ya [/quote]
i rest my case fella, how's yours coming along?
Dean told me about this when he had your car in
Thats top service for ya [/quote]
i rest my case fella, how's yours coming along?
#78
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (6)
my engine has been going strong without any major problems.
but then I got the engine off Ryan when he broke his saff.
Have spoken to Harvey a number of times without hassle and also used Ahmed to map the car last year and it fookin flew after that.
Since, I have done several track days and the engine has not missed a beat,
but then I got the engine off Ryan when he broke his saff.
Have spoken to Harvey a number of times without hassle and also used Ahmed to map the car last year and it fookin flew after that.
Since, I have done several track days and the engine has not missed a beat,
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by angel45
Fuel filter srapped to my anti roll bar (via 1 cable tie)and lots more i wounldn't even piss on the cunt if he was on fire imo
Dean told me about this when he had your car in
Thats top service for ya [/quote]
i rest my case fella, how's yours coming along?[/quote]
Hello
its all falling into place so soon