General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

This months EVO, best FWD drivers car of all time....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2006 | 11:55 AM
  #41  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
Thread Starter
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

Originally Posted by RichardPON
Since when did EVO journos know fuck all about cars?

I'd say their methodical appraoch to testing, and their combined knowledge is fairly extensive. They've got Gordon Murray as a guest writer - clearly they should have asked you instead Chip.

In fact, I'd say they were about as independent as possible - if any of their fleet cars are serviced or worked on, they give an honest appraisal of the service recieved as possible, often negative if that is the case.

Car reviews are also fairly spot on - they always come in for criticism when it comes to their shootouts but they are obviously limited, and if I remember the article correctly, they certainly gave the old mini the deserved credit.

Stil, I can't understand where I've been going wrong all this time? I looked to EVO as a one of the finest motoring magazines available, when all this time I should have been looking to Total Vauxhall as the bastion of unbiased motoring journalism.




They don't mind admitting when they get things wrong either. They have really changed their mind of the Focus RS over the years
Old 04-08-2006 | 11:56 AM
  #42  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Since when did EVO journos know fuck all about cars?

I'd say their methodical appraoch to testing, and their combined knowledge is fairly extensive. They've got Gordon Murray as a guest writer - clearly they should have asked you instead Chip.

In fact, I'd say they were about as independent as possible - if any of their fleet cars are serviced or worked on, they give an honest appraisal of the service recieved as possible, often negative if that is the case.

Car reviews are also fairly spot on - they always come in for criticism when it comes to their shootouts but they are obviously limited, and if I remember the article correctly, they certainly gave the old mini the deserved credit.

Stil, I can't understand where I've been going wrong all this time? I looked to EVO as a one of the finest motoring magazines available, when all this time I should have been looking to Total Vauxhall as the bastion of unbiased motoring journalism.




They don't mind admitting when they get things wrong either. They have really changed their mind of the Focus RS over the years
EVO mag needs more T+A imo
Old 04-08-2006 | 11:57 AM
  #43  
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 2
From: Norwich
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Since when did EVO journos know fuck all about cars?

I'd say their methodical appraoch to testing, and their combined knowledge is fairly extensive. They've got Gordon Murray as a guest writer - clearly they should have asked you instead Chip.

In fact, I'd say they were about as independent as possible - if any of their fleet cars are serviced or worked on, they give an honest appraisal of the service recieved as possible, often negative if that is the case.

Car reviews are also fairly spot on - they always come in for criticism when it comes to their shootouts but they are obviously limited, and if I remember the article correctly, they certainly gave the old mini the deserved credit.

Stil, I can't understand where I've been going wrong all this time? I looked to EVO as a one of the finest motoring magazines available, when all this time I should have been looking to Total Vauxhall as the bastion of unbiased motoring journalism.




They don't mind admitting when they get things wrong either. They have really changed their mind of the Focus RS over the years
And if you actually READ the article, changed it back again due to the example they had this time, being similar to the one they originally tested . They now reckon you need to drive a few to find a goo 'un....
Old 04-08-2006 | 11:58 AM
  #44  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
Thread Starter
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

Originally Posted by MattRS1600i

lol, no, it was a pro driver, i have the magazine at home, i'll try to get details up later, however i do agree with your second point
Ta, I'd actually be really interested to read that I like stuff like that alot
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:00 PM
  #45  
Stavros's Avatar
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 1
From: North Korea
Default

Originally Posted by Cam
Originally Posted by MattRS1600i
106 ralleye I reckon ...getting back on topic


Old 04-08-2006 | 12:00 PM
  #46  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
Thread Starter
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Since when did EVO journos know fuck all about cars?

I'd say their methodical appraoch to testing, and their combined knowledge is fairly extensive. They've got Gordon Murray as a guest writer - clearly they should have asked you instead Chip.

In fact, I'd say they were about as independent as possible - if any of their fleet cars are serviced or worked on, they give an honest appraisal of the service recieved as possible, often negative if that is the case.

Car reviews are also fairly spot on - they always come in for criticism when it comes to their shootouts but they are obviously limited, and if I remember the article correctly, they certainly gave the old mini the deserved credit.

Stil, I can't understand where I've been going wrong all this time? I looked to EVO as a one of the finest motoring magazines available, when all this time I should have been looking to Total Vauxhall as the bastion of unbiased motoring journalism.




They don't mind admitting when they get things wrong either. They have really changed their mind of the Focus RS over the years
And if you actually READ the article, changed it back again due to the example they had this time, being similar to the one they originally tested . They now reckon you need to drive a few to find a goo 'un....
Read what I wrote! I said... they have really changed their mind on it over the years!!!!
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:02 PM
  #47  
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 2
From: Norwich
Default

Yes first they thought it was poor, then they thought it was great and now they think it is average again and depends entirely on whether you manage to find a "sweet" one or not .
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:03 PM
  #48  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Yes first they thought it was poor, then they thought it was great and now they think it is average again and depends entirely on whether you manage to find a "sweet" one or not .
Shonky Ford build quality for ya
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:03 PM
  #49  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
Thread Starter
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

so they have changed their minds!!!
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:04 PM
  #50  
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 2
From: Norwich
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
so they have changed their minds!!!
back to what they originally thought
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:05 PM
  #51  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield
Default

So the Integra won then?
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:05 PM
  #52  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Yes first they thought it was poor, then they thought it was great and now they think it is average again and depends entirely on whether you manage to find a "sweet" one or not .

Whilst i recognise ford dont make cars the way that toyota do i dont beleive for a minute there was THAT much difference between the ones they tested in reality.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:05 PM
  #53  
89xr2's Avatar
89xr2
Brap!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 0
From: N-Town
Default

Gotta be the Integra type R..
I would have thought the mini would be up there near the top as well.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:08 PM
  #54  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Teg or the 205 would be my choice from that innacurate top 15 compiled by people who obvously havent ever driven a decent original mini
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:09 PM
  #55  
_DAN_'s Avatar
_DAN_
Yoon
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Yeah glad the ITR won
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:10 PM
  #56  
XRT_si's Avatar
XRT_si
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,861
Likes: 54
From: London
Default

Bloody interesting article. Only one ive driven out of that lot is a clio williams which i thought was amazing down windy B roads so love to have a go in the cars rated above that!

Surprised the 205 still did so well,its a real credit to the car being as the design is how old? 25 years or so?

I am actually buying one very soon anyway but love to see what they mean properly now
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:10 PM
  #57  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
Thread Starter
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

Originally Posted by Cam
So the Integra won then?
Yes mate. Read what they said about it in my first post. Look pony in my opinion.... but I'm already looking at getting one

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/list.asp?s=233

Loads for sale!
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:12 PM
  #58  
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 2
From: Norwich
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Yes first they thought it was poor, then they thought it was great and now they think it is average again and depends entirely on whether you manage to find a "sweet" one or not .

Whilst i recognise ford dont make cars the way that toyota do i dont beleive for a minute there was THAT much difference between the ones they tested in reality.
It's all to do with the handling, if you remember all the original press cars were slated for torque steering everywhere and tramlining all over the place.

They then tested a reader's car some months ago, that exhibited none of these traits and it immediately made it into one of the best handling cars they had tested.

The next one they got for this test, although not as bad as the original press cars, exhibited similar traits, and it spoilt the experience for them. They acknowledged that had it been as sweet as the last one, that it would have made the top six, so they were disappointed themselves.....
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:14 PM
  #59  
Grant's Avatar
Grant
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Central Scotland
Default

Where did the 205 come overall. I have a 205 GTI 1.9 99% standard as my daily driver as im waiting on my ST. One of the most rewarding cars I have ever driven
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:14 PM
  #60  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
Thread Starter
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Teg or the 205 would be my choice from that innacurate top 15 compiled by people who obvously havent ever driven a decent original mini
have you read the reasons why? they do mention it being the obvious oversight but say they drove one against modern opposition in issue 34 and it felt too classic....

Its not like they have not even mentioned it.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:15 PM
  #61  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by Cam
So the Integra won then?
Yes mate. Read what they said about it in my first post. Look pony in my opinion.... but I'm already looking at getting one

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/list.asp?s=233

Loads for sale!
My only experience of one was getting smashed in the face by the airbag
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:15 PM
  #62  
89xr2's Avatar
89xr2
Brap!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 0
From: N-Town
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by Cam
So the Integra won then?
Yes mate. Read what they said about it in my first post. Look pony in my opinion.... but I'm already looking at getting one

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/list.asp?s=233

Loads for sale!
I take it it's the original type R that won? not the dc5?
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:17 PM
  #63  
_DAN_'s Avatar
_DAN_
Yoon
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Originally Posted by 89XR2
Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by Cam
So the Integra won then?
Yes mate. Read what they said about it in my first post. Look pony in my opinion.... but I'm already looking at getting one

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/list.asp?s=233

Loads for sale!
I take it it's the original type R that won? not the dc5?
Yes mate the DC2 won
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:19 PM
  #64  
_DAN_'s Avatar
_DAN_
Yoon
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Why the FUCK are these not included?

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/82911.htm

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/82596.htm
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:21 PM
  #65  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Teg or the 205 would be my choice from that innacurate top 15 compiled by people who obvously havent ever driven a decent original mini
have you read the reasons why? they do mention it being the obvious oversight but say they drove one against modern opposition in issue 34 and it felt too classic....

Its not like they have not even mentioned it.

No mate, i havent read this months EVO yet, its not something i read very often TBH, i never buy it, so all depends when a colleague leaves a copy lieing around or not.

Fair play to them though if they had their eyes open enough to consider one, and yes i recongnise that it doesnt have the creature comforts of a modern car, so i guess it depends what you class as a "drivers" car, to me a drivers car shouldnt have:
ABS
TC
PAS

As all those things make me feel detached from the car, although i must admit some of the modern ones are getting better at making you feel like its you in control again, the latest shape MR2 ABS for example feels quite nice to use even on track


Im from a bygone age though, i wouldnt really expect my opinions to be reflected in the mainstream popular motoring press publishications and my comments were very tongue in cheek, i agree with their choice on most of those cars to a certain extent
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:22 PM
  #66  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield
Default

Originally Posted by Bat-fink
because they are lethal and handle like a grandfather clock?
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:23 PM
  #67  
89xr2's Avatar
89xr2
Brap!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 0
From: N-Town
Default

Originally Posted by Bat-fink
Second one is rear wheel drive mate mid engine and the first one will send you into a tree any chance it gets.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:24 PM
  #68  
BlueSmoke's Avatar
BlueSmoke
PassionFord's crazy fool!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7,102
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by Daveyboy
well if chip will be pleased, i would guess the integra seeing as he has one.
Oh..... I'm not sure there's much about Chip's 'Teg that's very pleasing right now....

I actually believe that car is the source of his biggest motoring heartbreak!
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:24 PM
  #69  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Yes first they thought it was poor, then they thought it was great and now they think it is average again and depends entirely on whether you manage to find a "sweet" one or not .

Whilst i recognise ford dont make cars the way that toyota do i dont beleive for a minute there was THAT much difference between the ones they tested in reality.
It's all to do with the handling, if you remember all the original press cars were slated for torque steering everywhere and tramlining all over the place.

They then tested a reader's car some months ago, that exhibited none of these traits and it immediately made it into one of the best handling cars they had tested.

The next one they got for this test, although not as bad as the original press cars, exhibited similar traits, and it spoilt the experience for them. They acknowledged that had it been as sweet as the last one, that it would have made the top six, so they were disappointed themselves.....
Was the readers car standard?

Cause i really cant see 3 modern production cars varying by THAT much in all honesty, even shonky ford ones!
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:25 PM
  #70  
XRT_si's Avatar
XRT_si
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,861
Likes: 54
From: London
Default

Anyone used to read performance car back in the day?
They did a interesting best hot hatch test.
Clio Williams, 205Gti, Renault 5 GT, Civc Type R (EK shape) and couple of others which i cant remember now.

Willams won, then i think it was 205 then Renault 5. Rememmber them mentioning how good it was to drive a standard unmolested Renault 5.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:26 PM
  #71  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Cam
Originally Posted by Bat-fink
because they are lethal and handle like a grandfather clock?

crap light car with an engine that can be made fairly quick

Not in any way a "drivers car" IMHO


I would have been amazed if that featured in any serious list of drivers or handling cars TBH
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:30 PM
  #72  
89xr2's Avatar
89xr2
Brap!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 0
From: N-Town
Default

Originally Posted by XRT_si
Anyone used to read performance car back in the day?
They did a interesting best hot hatch test.
Clio Williams, 205Gti, Renault 5 GT, Civc Type R (EK shape) and couple of others which i cant remember now.

Willams won, then i think it was 205 then Renault 5. Rememmber them mentioning how good it was to drive a standard unmolested Renault 5.
They rated a williams clio above an ek9 type r?

Now that does surpise me.

Not that i've driven either but honda are usually spot on with their cars.

Porkie, out of interest was the original door stop shaped crx mentioned in evo anywhere?
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:30 PM
  #73  
BlueSmoke's Avatar
BlueSmoke
PassionFord's crazy fool!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7,102
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Default

Chip mate, do you really feel that PAS makes a car worse to drive? I guess being younger than you I take it for granted more, but I have driven both and honestly feel you are in more control with PAS.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:31 PM
  #74  
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 2
From: Norwich
Default

Chip,
I believe from memory that the last one used on this test may have been Blue-finned, I'm sure I remember reading that . Lee obviously has the mag in front of him, so could confirm...
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:33 PM
  #75  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by DogSmoke
Chip mate, do you really feel that PAS makes a car worse to drive? I guess being younger than you I take it for granted more, but I have driven both and honestly feel you are in more control with PAS.
To me it just takes away some of the feeling you get from the steering wheel, but im sure its entirely psychological, but i can only comment on drivers car from a point of view of what brings me personally pleasure from driving and i like NO driver aids really so it actually feels like its me driving not a computer or set of belts and pulleys.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:33 PM
  #76  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Chip,
I believe from memory that the last one used on this test may have been Blue-finned, I'm sure I remember reading that . Lee obviously has the mag in front of him, so could confirm...
Sounds about right, half a bar more boost and suddenly they think it handles well
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:34 PM
  #77  
89xr2's Avatar
89xr2
Brap!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 0
From: N-Town
Default

Originally Posted by DogSmoke
Chip mate, do you really feel that PAS makes a car worse to drive? I guess being younger than you I take it for granted more, but I have driven both and honestly feel you are in more control with PAS.
My brother has a brand new Fiesta Zetec S TDCi and I can honestly say that my xr2's steering feels alot better. It's just so more involved and you can really tell what the tyres are doing through your finger tips. The zetec S seems to dull down the input from the front wheels.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:37 PM
  #78  
BlueSmoke's Avatar
BlueSmoke
PassionFord's crazy fool!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7,102
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Originally Posted by DogSmoke
Chip mate, do you really feel that PAS makes a car worse to drive? I guess being younger than you I take it for granted more, but I have driven both and honestly feel you are in more control with PAS.
To me it just takes away some of the feeling you get from the steering wheel, but im sure its entirely psychological, but i can only comment on drivers car from a point of view of what brings me personally pleasure from driving and i like NO driver aids really so it actually feels like its me driving not a computer or set of belts and pulleys.
Fair enough. I think what you're saying is true in the "shopping trolleys" like Puntos, Fiestas etc but I find in the BMW that the steering is very responsive and you feel everything.
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:37 PM
  #79  
XRT_si's Avatar
XRT_si
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,861
Likes: 54
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by 89XR2
Originally Posted by XRT_si
Anyone used to read performance car back in the day?
They did a interesting best hot hatch test.
Clio Williams, 205Gti, Renault 5 GT, Civc Type R (EK shape) and couple of others which i cant remember now.

Willams won, then i think it was 205 then Renault 5. Rememmber them mentioning how good it was to drive a standard unmolested Renault 5.
They rated a williams clio above an ek9 type r?

Now that does surpise me.

Not that i've driven either but honda are usually spot on with their cars.

Porkie, out of interest was the original door stop shaped crx mentioned in evo anywhere?
Yes better than the EK9. Then the newer civic type r didnt get in?

Performance Car also did a break down on about 20 other FWD greats, CRX and RS1600i were both mentioned on that but then you have to bear in mind this was all before the new wave of hot hatchs had come out such asd the Focus RS etc...
Old 04-08-2006 | 12:44 PM
  #80  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
Thread Starter
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Originally Posted by Cam
Originally Posted by Bat-fink
because they are lethal and handle like a grandfather clock?

crap light car with an engine that can be made fairly quick

Not in any way a "drivers car" IMHO


I would have been amazed if that featured in any serious list of drivers or handling cars TBH
Well EVO magazine mentioned it as one that just missed out on being there...

Never driven one myself


Quick Reply: This months EVO, best FWD drivers car of all time....



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:13 AM.