dynoed my cossie
#42
Oh yeah sorry..im just ruling him out in case anyone or yourself might of thought it..
Weird though as its a real laggy engine that sounds like someone has tried to get going by putting a rally chip in it thinking the big ignition table might help???
Or maybe just a mix match of bits someone has slung together??
Anyhow sounds like your getting to the bottom of it all and will get it flying!!
cheers danny
#43
Super Moderator
iTrader: (5)
we have done phase 1 of the fix and it is much much much better
he now has a list of advisories for phase 2
advance wasn't the issue with the car as it is only over advanced right at the top retard is an issue as well
the yb 3bar cosworth chip is a very good map for what it was designed for
he now has a list of advisories for phase 2
advance wasn't the issue with the car as it is only over advanced right at the top retard is an issue as well
the yb 3bar cosworth chip is a very good map for what it was designed for
Last edited by Turbosystems; 02-06-2012 at 06:22 PM.
#44
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
I would agree with that,
Not so much with that.
Live mapping is just guess work on the ignition timing front imo, the best you can do is advance timing until you find the det limit or leave timing at a point that isn't as good as it could be. On the rollers its a totally different story, I wouldn't rpm hold at mid-high boost obviously rather do various power runs altering timing at various points each time.
Rob,
you don't need it on a RR
look at matts his wasn't done on the rollers
QED
look at matts his wasn't done on the rollers
QED
Live mapping is just guess work on the ignition timing front imo, the best you can do is advance timing until you find the det limit or leave timing at a point that isn't as good as it could be. On the rollers its a totally different story, I wouldn't rpm hold at mid-high boost obviously rather do various power runs altering timing at various points each time.
Rob,
#48
The state of my wiring loom after they had my car was horrific
#50
I would stick with someone with a good rep personally. You can't go wrong with folks like MSD, even for a power run. Just do a search on here for Mtech, there are loads of posts about Matt (owner) beings a toe rag. Everything from the quality of there products to their gash customer service.
Even their Ebay feed back is appalling!
Even their Ebay feed back is appalling!
#52
I would agree with that,
Not so much with that.
Live mapping is just guess work on the ignition timing front imo, the best you can do is advance timing until you find the det limit or leave timing at a point that isn't as good as it could be. On the rollers its a totally different story, I wouldn't rpm hold at mid-high boost obviously rather do various power runs altering timing at various points each time.
Rob,
Not so much with that.
Live mapping is just guess work on the ignition timing front imo, the best you can do is advance timing until you find the det limit or leave timing at a point that isn't as good as it could be. On the rollers its a totally different story, I wouldn't rpm hold at mid-high boost obviously rather do various power runs altering timing at various points each time.
Rob,
There is so many points in the rpm range this can happen so unless your in a controlled state ie a rr how can you make them points perfect??
On a good rr(dyno dynamics is the best)you can check this all the way through the rev range just like on a bench dyno so imo so much better than mapping on the road..
Tractive effort is the best tool for this as it shows you the car still making more power/torque and at some points you could add 3-4 degrees with no increase in power at all and in fact lose power,on the road you can never know this and therefore your giving power away..
You can also load the rr right up and make the car think its on a 1.6 up ward hill for example and then take the car right through the gears with det cans to check for det even right through 5th gear..doing that on the road and up a hill at 150mph+ is very hairy so another good reason why its alot more accurate on the rr...
Of course all the top live mappers arent going to agree but i reckon they could take their best road mapped car and take it to the rr and prove they can make it even better..
The likes of msd karl etc etc are very good at this as they have a great feel and knowing of when the car is performing very well and that is a great talent but they could all better every map on a good rr imo...
cheers danny
#53
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
Don't get where your going with this mate?
AFR's are easy to get right on the road I don't disagree. You can't get to all the cells but thats not so important. Its also not too difficult to produce an ignition table that doesn't det.
However, you don't really know how far away you are from det with out actually hitting det (on the road), and if you haven't hit det and backed off a little you are just leaving advance on the table. ie) theres no det at a certain load so you leave it because you think you could be close to the det limit.... On a dyno I can just watch the torque figure and obtain the largest safe advance value possible for any given load cell.
So for the ultimate map, I personally think that a combo of on the road AND dyno mapping is essential.
Genuine question:
If you believe 100% that you can produce a map with the most advance possible whilst keeping safely away from the det limit, whats your method on the road?
And yes, this is experience talking... I don't map cars for a living but have tuned on both the road and on a DD dyno. I find tuning on a RR far more preferable to being driven around trying to hit cells long enough to get the perfect tune.
Also, I've never used a hub dyno, why would you say these are comparable to live mapping... ie) being able to rpm hold at high loads etc? why would a hub dyno be any different to a DD dyno (beter worse) ignoring wheel spin. PS, I don't care about accurate bhp figures as I don't think these are important for mapping.
Rob,
#54
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
Absolutely agree 100%...If you take a car to det on the road and say lower the ignition say 2 degrees to get rid of det you may still have to much ignition in the map and there fore giving away power..
There is so many points in the rpm range this can happen so unless your in a controlled state ie a rr how can you make them points perfect??
On a good rr(dyno dynamics is the best)you can check this all the way through the rev range just like on a bench dyno so imo so much better than mapping on the road..
Tractive effort is the best tool for this as it shows you the car still making more power/torque and at some points you could add 3-4 degrees with no increase in power at all and in fact lose power,on the road you can never know this and therefore your giving power away..
You can also load the rr right up and make the car think its on a 1.6 up ward hill for example and then take the car right through the gears with det cans to check for det even right through 5th gear..doing that on the road and up a hill at 150mph+ is very hairy so another good reason why its alot more accurate on the rr...
Of course all the top live mappers arent going to agree but i reckon they could take their best road mapped car and take it to the rr and prove they can make it even better..
The likes of msd karl etc etc are very good at this as they have a great feel and knowing of when the car is performing very well and that is a great talent but they could all better every map on a good rr imo...
cheers danny
There is so many points in the rpm range this can happen so unless your in a controlled state ie a rr how can you make them points perfect??
On a good rr(dyno dynamics is the best)you can check this all the way through the rev range just like on a bench dyno so imo so much better than mapping on the road..
Tractive effort is the best tool for this as it shows you the car still making more power/torque and at some points you could add 3-4 degrees with no increase in power at all and in fact lose power,on the road you can never know this and therefore your giving power away..
You can also load the rr right up and make the car think its on a 1.6 up ward hill for example and then take the car right through the gears with det cans to check for det even right through 5th gear..doing that on the road and up a hill at 150mph+ is very hairy so another good reason why its alot more accurate on the rr...
Of course all the top live mappers arent going to agree but i reckon they could take their best road mapped car and take it to the rr and prove they can make it even better..
The likes of msd karl etc etc are very good at this as they have a great feel and knowing of when the car is performing very well and that is a great talent but they could all better every map on a good rr imo...
cheers danny
Rob,
PS Danny, do you still have the spray shop near crawley?
#55
Yea thats my thinking also. Im not saying live mapping is shit or anything we all know its not. But I think the good live map guys use experience as a big tool. Its just my personal opinion that a decent dyno is a dream tool for any mapper.
Rob,
PS Danny, do you still have the spray shop near crawley?
Rob,
PS Danny, do you still have the spray shop near crawley?
My paintshop is in cowfold mate on the 272 the road between cowfold and buck barn just as you leave the cowfold village..
If you come out of cowfold keep your eyes peeled for the we paint sign on your right and were up there..
cheers danny
#58
Happily retired
Are you sure there are any blades on the compressor .
#60
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Whats wrong with essex turbo's,they rebuilt my t34.48,seems fine to me
#61
#62
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
Can you tell me how you can do the above on the road? This isn't me being a difficult tosser lol, I'm generally interested.
Rob,
#65
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
Your avoiding my question mate. I have never said that live road mapping can't produce superb results. But a combination of live road and dyno is the only way as far as im concerned to truly tune ignition tables to achieve max power. Im not saying that experience can't get you damn close... maybe close enough that it wouldn't be a difference someone could feel.
RR's don't really have to represent true road loads. As long as I can rpm hold and reach a range of loads that 'could' be seen on the road (kind of the max and min that would ever be seen) all is well.
But get what you say about the 4 retarders lol, things can get a little stinky though.
RR's don't really have to represent true road loads. As long as I can rpm hold and reach a range of loads that 'could' be seen on the road (kind of the max and min that would ever be seen) all is well.
But get what you say about the 4 retarders lol, things can get a little stinky though.
#67
Sorry mate I typed my late night reply a little unclearly. But I was trying to say essentially the same thing, max torque is probably a better indication tho. I run the maximum amount of advance before either I hit det OR i see torque drop, I pull a degree or so off that at higher load points to be safe, If i find the det limit before I see a peak torque figure I generally pull more than one degree out.
Can you tell me how you can do the above on the road? This isn't me being a difficult tosser lol, I'm generally interested.
Rob,
Can you tell me how you can do the above on the road? This isn't me being a difficult tosser lol, I'm generally interested.
Rob,
Your avoiding my question mate. I have never said that live road mapping can't produce superb results. But a combination of live road and dyno is the only way as far as im concerned to truly tune ignition tables to achieve max power. Im not saying that experience can't get you damn close... maybe close enough that it wouldn't be a difference someone could feel.
RR's don't really have to represent true road loads. As long as I can rpm hold and reach a range of loads that 'could' be seen on the road (kind of the max and min that would ever be seen) all is well.
But get what you say about the 4 retarders lol, things can get a little stinky though.
RR's don't really have to represent true road loads. As long as I can rpm hold and reach a range of loads that 'could' be seen on the road (kind of the max and min that would ever be seen) all is well.
But get what you say about the 4 retarders lol, things can get a little stinky though.
Spot on again and of course your question will be dodged as the answer is any road mapper cant achieve what you can on the rollers..
I was trying to make the exact same point myself last night but couldnt say my point properly like you have above..
Max torque can be achieved well before det and to much advance can lose torque measuring this with tractive effort is the most effective way and there is no possible way that can be done on the road..
I would happily put money on it that any tuner after doing a road map couldnt then get that same map better on a dd rr??
I bet no one would take my offer up??
cheers danny
#68
Super Moderator
iTrader: (5)
I'll repeat what I have posted in the past
engine dyno, Hub dyno/RR. real world driving mapping
Thats how oe is stuff is done
You cannot state that a RR road is the only way to do it
The RRs mere mortal have access too are nothing like the facilities OE manufacturers have available too them
So I will reiterate you cannot map a car properly on a RR alone
It is just a useful tool for certain aspects
I had my own RR for 20 years I did not have to rely on borrowing or booking other peoples
So I know exactly what is possible to be done on a RR
You map them how you prefer but I will do it my way
engine dyno, Hub dyno/RR. real world driving mapping
Thats how oe is stuff is done
You cannot state that a RR road is the only way to do it
The RRs mere mortal have access too are nothing like the facilities OE manufacturers have available too them
So I will reiterate you cannot map a car properly on a RR alone
It is just a useful tool for certain aspects
I had my own RR for 20 years I did not have to rely on borrowing or booking other peoples
So I know exactly what is possible to be done on a RR
You map them how you prefer but I will do it my way
Last edited by Turbosystems; 03-06-2012 at 01:42 PM.
#69
Super Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Danny you do get excitable when you think someone has agreed with you
when in fact nobody has
You are obsessed with DD rolling roads it's a set of rollers with a pair of retarders like many other makes
Read my above post which I have stated on every RR argument you start
when in fact nobody has
You are obsessed with DD rolling roads it's a set of rollers with a pair of retarders like many other makes
Read my above post which I have stated on every RR argument you start
#70
Danny you do get excitable when you think someone has agreed with you
when in fact nobody has
You are obsessed with DD rolling roads it's a set of rollers with a pair of retarders like many other makes
Read my above post which I have stated on every RR argument you start
when in fact nobody has
You are obsessed with DD rolling roads it's a set of rollers with a pair of retarders like many other makes
Read my above post which I have stated on every RR argument you start
He uses a dd rr so of course he will agree with me,just like everyone else does that uses one..
In reality we are never mapping anything from complete scratch as we all have plenty of base maps to work from..
Even the first base maps you worked from(the old terry drury stuff)all now owned by ahmed i believe have been bettered and bettered all the time ,they get better because our knowledge and tools get better!!
Your old rr was prob a piece of shit and prob wasnt worth using and since that old thing you just dont trust any other and deffo havnt tried using a dd rr..
Its cool though as your happy with your method and then happy to put your customers cars on the hub dyno even if others will disbelieve their power claims..
We will always argue about this tony as your so stuck in your ways and wont try a dd rr..
I know loads of tuners that actually road map and then use the dd rr to make that map better so i know im right..
They are building custom maps on custom one off engines on stand alone ecus so they can spend 3-4 days of road mapping and then perfecting that map on the rr..they always make it better not just in the ignition table but in the afrs at higher rpm..
If you dont believe this why not take my challenge and see if you can better one of your own maps on a dd rr???
I wont hold my breath mate as like i said your stuck in your ways...
cheers danny
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Russ Payne
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
1
25-09-2015 08:29 PM