214bhp on MFI but want more!
19-11-2008 | 09:34 PM
#82
Colossal Pervert
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 1
From: Location: Location:
20-11-2008 | 09:39 AM
#84
Colossal Pervert
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 1
From: Location: Location:
The fuelling system isn't boost-aware, only the spark ECU is... If you have an 'unlimited' chip (eg, superchips).. then all that does is remove the boost cut - the spark angle isn't mapped above the standard table.. not ideal.. The AB chips (and resellers of) are fully mapped to about 1.3 bar.
20-11-2008 | 08:25 PM
#86
15K+ Super Poster!!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,885
Likes: 17
From: Stockport, Cheshire
Yes it is.
Pa_jso (what is your name?!)
Yes, of course they can but equip isn't as readily available. Tony @ TS used to map them to 22psi/the full 2.5 bar map sensor range. I don't have mfi anymore but i find it all really interesting. I think it's a really nice idea using continous injection and then varying fuel pressure.
Rick.
Pa_jso (what is your name?!)
Yes, of course they can but equip isn't as readily available. Tony @ TS used to map them to 22psi/the full 2.5 bar map sensor range. I don't have mfi anymore but i find it all really interesting. I think it's a really nice idea using continous injection and then varying fuel pressure.
Rick.
22-11-2008 | 02:29 PM
#92
Fixing the bloody car...
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 2
From: Norwich, Norfolk
Well, put it this way, D4nny8oy on here has a CVH engine that we built. Low comp, standard rebuilt head, Newman Cam, Stage 2 T3 Turbo and I consider that to be absolutely as far as that setup could go powerwise at 215bhp. That has been mapped extremely well on EFi and is one of the fastest RST's I have driven...
215? That was a while ago now (on your 2wd DD rollers IIRC). Pretty sure it was 226bhp after the injectors/ boost controller/ etc.
It'd probably be quicker if I could get the power down, pmsl.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
