General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

How to calculate CR? just got my new rods/pistons :D :D :D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #1  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default How to calculate CR? just got my new rods/pistons :D :D :D

is it possible to work it out from the rod length, bore and piston height?

its all going into a 2.0l zetec with std throw crank

reason im asking is cos the piston has a flat top, i assumed it would be dished as i wanted a CR of 7.8:1

Rods are Carrillo, pistons Wiseco

Rods:
centre to centre 5.362
P.E bore 0.8132 (little end?)
B.E bore 1.9645 (big end?)

pistons:
comp height 1.181 (from centre of pin to top of piston??)
bore size 3.3660

Stroke:
88.0mm

compressed head gasket thickness is 0.5mm

only thing i dont know is the cc of the combustion chambers in the head

cheers anyone lol
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:35 PM
  #2  
Garage19's Avatar
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 1
From: Nr Ipswich
Default

Dan,

If you have the original zetec rod length and comp height i should be able to work back from the original CR and give you a figure.

PE will stand for (wrist) pin end or piston end which is yank speak for little end.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:41 PM
  #3  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

the pistons are flat top?

I dont see how they can lower the CR then without causing horrible issues with having no squish bands on them

what is the deck height of the piston in the bore?

there isnt enough information above to work out the CR

head volume is an important one for a start, although if you know what hte standard quoted head volume is you could use that to get a guess at approx cr
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #4  
Matt's Avatar
Matt
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
From: Doncaster
Default

http://www.newagemotorsport.f9.co.uk...ion_ratios.xls

put your figures into that spreadsheet
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #5  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

ok mate cheers.

i cant find the std stuff tho lol, exccept the original bore is 84.8mm and the CR is 10.0:1

i think the rods tho were made to the same length, but cant be 100% sure on that
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #6  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

chip, i cant find the cc for the head mate, and i aint got the block machined yet to find the piston deck height (whatever that is )

matt, cheers, ill ave a look
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #7  
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Default

If you dont know the clearance volume there is little you can do without measuring it.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #8  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

matt, that comes out at 7.56:1

but not sure how accurate it is lol

it says the head cc is 45.5 (think thats what that bit is lol)
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #9  
Garage19's Avatar
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 1
From: Nr Ipswich
Default

Chip,

Because of its under square bore stroke ratio, i fear that a really low comp zetec (<8:1) will be very hard with out loosing the squish band on the piston or shortening the rod length to enable thicker crowns/deeper dishes on the pistons.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #10  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
If you dont know the clearance volume there is little you can do without measuring it.
whats that stu?

it says on the spec sheet: suggested clearance 0.0030 if thats it?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #11  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Dan, numbers or STFU
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:51 PM
  #12  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by fudgeass
Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
If you dont know the clearance volume there is little you can do without measuring it.
whats that stu?

it says on the spec sheet: suggested clearance 0.0030 if thats it?

that will be the piston to bore clearance needs setting at 3 thou
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:51 PM
  #13  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

ill scan the spec sheets in and post up when maytee gets back off lunch as i aint got a scanner
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:53 PM
  #14  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Dan, are you building this yourself, or are you going to get someone who has at least a vague idea about engines to lend a hand

Cause if its DIY, i reckon you should start ordering some spare bits
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:54 PM
  #15  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

pmsl chip - no, philm/machine shop he uses are building it lol
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #16  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

well drop all the bits off and ask them to tell you the CR then mate rather than ask a load of people on the internet to guess without being able to take measurements!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:23 PM
  #17  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

ah fair enough lol

i also emailed the guy at wiseco, as the pistons were done ages ago but turned out to be for e a n/a zetec, he got these back on xmas eve and date on info sheet with em is from 08/12/05 then shipped from the US so i guess they are the right ones lol
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #18  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Sounds like the shape of them is dicated by the internal geometry of the stnadard engine as Doug mentions above.

I guess to get really decent power from a zetec then you will need to shorten the crank throw slightly in order to allow you to maintain rod length whilst also moving the centre of the piston down so it can be dished with raised sides.

Obviously not the sort of thing you are trying to do, but thats probably the way to go for BIG power.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:38 PM
  #19  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

well its gonna be running 350-400bhp mate
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #20  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

thats not really what i meant by big power, i was thinking more martin/rod

hopefully 350 shouldnt be an issue even on that design of pistons
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 02:22 PM
  #21  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Thread Starter
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,134
Likes: 106
From: Wiltshire
Default

its big for a ZT unless your sunny and get a WRC lump lol
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 05:24 PM
  #22  
AlexF's Avatar
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
From: Newbury
Default

try this speadsheet


www.afracing.com/cr.xls


Alex
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mgtkr1
General Car Related Discussion.
107
Dec 6, 2016 04:23 PM
Anonymous
General Car Related Discussion.
48
Oct 2, 2005 02:16 PM
Garage19
General Car Related Discussion.
19
May 21, 2005 02:50 PM
PhilM
General Car Related Discussion.
2
Nov 2, 2004 08:57 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:04 PM.