Who do you think would win?

 

RST?

 

rst




andy

 

None, as its not big and its not clever









You should do m8

 

surlyt over a 100 tho the ferrari would see it off?

 

i would guess the ford,,, 512's are shit in my eyes

 

Ferrari.

 

rst

 

win on what?

re sale value?
1/4?
top speed?
looks?

 

well???

 

I would think after 100mph the Ferrari would just take it,


Mike

 

General Information

Price: $87,000
Miles Per Gallon: 10/15 mpg
Curb Weight: 3660 lbs
Layout: Mid-Engine/RWD
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual


Engine

Type: Flat-12
Displacement: 4942 cc
Horsepower: 390 bhp @ 6300 rpm
Torque: 354 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Redline: 6800 rpm


Performance

0-60 mph: 5.3 sec
0-100 mph: 12.2 sec
Quarter Mile: --.- sec @ --- mph
Skidpad: .87g
Top Speed: 180 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: --- ft
Slalom Speed: --.- mph

 

and the relevence of that is??

so what you asking?

what would win on reliability?? or what would win over the 1/4? or top speed? etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc

bit of an open question

 

How come everybody except you knows what we are talking about?

 

as im a thick fucker

 

and obviously that makes two... not just me TT

sorry Rad..

 

is this a rhetoerical question or we gonna get an answer wi vid

 

I think the Ferrari would DEFO cost more to fill up with Optimax

 

...to 60 the Ferrari 0 100mph the Ferrari...100mph onwards the Ferrari.

If you beat a Testerossa the engine was fucked or the driver couldnt drive.

You would be = to my 348 to 60 and youd be quicker to 100 but after that seeya as mine dones 175 ish

 

with ur driving tony it aint rocket science lol

 

didnt max power back in the day 95ish, have a 512 @ santa pod up against something ford or peugeot?

 

RST to 100, Ferrari 100+?

 

Hmmmmmmm..... interesting....

Phil - You do 175 at Brunters?


Dave - What do you mean, time and place my friend



My car pulls VERY well from 100 upwards.....

 

Get it to Brunters to prove it or STFU

 

 

lol just finish my dinner and i will get scared lol

 

Who cares what the end result is even if you could just keep up it would be impressive as hell .

Get it organised and post the vid

 

was a nova 2ltr 16v on carbs, think the nova beat it too!

 

5.3 to 60, and 12.5 to hundred is easily beatable with 300+ ponies

 

doh should have known it would be a nova in max power of all places

 

Think Max Poo put Nathan Scadans RST up aginst it aswell. White S2 with the arse jacked up and running 17" Venoms (they were the days )

 

Tim off here's Corsa did 100 in the 11s, his mates Nova did it in the 10s, and other mate did it in a high 9.

And thats with FWD poo traction versus RWD and mega fat tyres awesome traction the rarri wold have.

Also take into account it bet its MEGA hard/impossible to equal the Ferrari book times, as it wouldve been done by a Pro who had countless attempts (if it happened at all).

So yes, the Ferrari would get absolutley fucked over IMO.

 

RST...

I got timed against a new Lambo, although I lost on the day, I got timed again a month later with the car running kinda as it should, and I would of beaten it to 100.

 

Good timing steve, we both posted the same at the same time

 

Testarossa is on KE-Jet too!!! (AFAIK!!!)

 

Raced one 3 up out of a round about with PHILZVH and the Mrs not long after the car was set up a couple of years ago. A few miles up the road when we'd slowed down for the next round about he caught up and gave us a big smile and wave.
Sounded though he was giving it the big one too us, but maybe he bottled it. All good fun though.

 

as the boy says, i was in the back, first time i'd been in sid's car and we had the testy drived wooped!!!!


and before anyone gives it HOW DO YOU KNOW HE WAS RACING?

i do because i was the one egging him on to race sid!!!!

it was awesome!!!!!! no other way to describe it.

the testy driver took it well though.

 

 

yer it was big grins all round i can tell you

 

RST...............................



no ask me which one i'd rather have