enormous grizzly bear pic
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
From: newcastle upon tyne
enormous grizzly bear pic
was talkin to our lass and she didnt believe me about the size of grizzlys so i went and found some pics etc, it was shot by a forest worker in america, he unloaded a full mag of 7mm into it, then reloaded as it was still alive and shot it in the head, this one had killed several people , weighed 1600pounds and measured 12 feet 6 inches at the SHOULDER not the head but the SHOULDER, i thought you would be as amazed as i was at the size of this fucka 
Trending Topics
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,580
Likes: 0
From: colchester
just looked it up (hence the edit) but the fastes man is a guy called bailey who ran at 27mph! so running is not an option! where your in bear county you either have
1) a Big fook ass gun
2) a jar of vasaline!
3) a big pot of hunny and hope its name is winnie!
bit nasty it had to be killed tho! dont forget we moved into its land not visa verca....tho most americans think they own the world!
1) a Big fook ass gun
2) a jar of vasaline!
3) a big pot of hunny and hope its name is winnie!
bit nasty it had to be killed tho! dont forget we moved into its land not visa verca....tho most americans think they own the world!
Advanced PassionFord User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jonsmiff
id like to shoot the fukin yank 
was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
was it totally necessary to kill the bear?yes cos sadly once a animal kills a person it'll do it again, once a animal stop becomming scared of people they'll they attack anyone where as usially they keep themselves to themselves.
PassionFord Regular
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jonsmiff
id like to shoot the fukin yank was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
Are you mad? Kill the fooker!? I'm sure if it had of been you with a 7mm gun and rupert the bear was grinning at you, you'd of just walked past him right?
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
From: newcastle upon tyne
Originally Posted by jonsmiff
id like to shoot the fukin yank was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
BANNED
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
From: glasgow
well it clocked him stood on its legs , roared and then strarted running at him, so he tried talking nicely to it and even offered it some candy but the bear wouldnt cooperate so he shot the fucka, in answer to your questionhe either shot it or becamr the next days shit!! [/quote]
if thats the case then of course he did what he had to do,but from the first post it just looked like the yank was out shootin,oh and whats this pish about the animal not being afraid of humans anymore look at the size of that bear,its frightened of no one, as far as im concerned if youre in a wild animals habitat then its tough shit if you get attacked or killed
[/quote]if thats the case then of course he did what he had to do,but from the first post it just looked like the yank was out shootin,oh and whats this pish about the animal not being afraid of humans anymore
look at the size of that bear,its frightened of no one, as far as im concerned if youre in a wild animals habitat then its tough shit if you get attacked or killed
PassionFord Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ste_gt
Originally Posted by jonsmiff
id like to shoot the fukin yank was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
was it totally necessary to kill the bear? Are you mad? Kill the fooker!? I'm sure if it had of been you with a 7mm gun and rupert the bear was grinning at you, you'd of just walked past him right?
most likely protecting its young no need to kill the bear just put it to sleep and move it away!
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
From: newcastle upon tyne
Originally Posted by Pete,RS Specialists
Originally Posted by jonsmiff
id like to shoot the fukin yank was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
10K+ Poster!!
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,518
Likes: 0
From: EsSEX ;)
Thats a huge bitch !!
Originally Posted by the strut brace
Originally Posted by jonsmiff
id like to shoot the fukin yank was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
was it totally necessary to kill the bear?
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,226
Likes: 0
From: SE
Not wanting to piss on anyones parade 
http://urbanlegends.about.com/librar...izzlybear5.htm
The Giant Grizzly Bear
This email tale, circulating constantly in one form or another since November 2001, seems to grow taller year by year. Ironically, the first two snapshots — the ones showing a hunter posing beside the carcass of an incredibly large Alaskan brown bear — are authentic. We know where and when they were taken, and by whom. The origin of the third photo purporting to show the remains of the behemoth's final victim is unknown. It was appended to the already-circulating email in late 2002.
Not quite a world record
In real life, the big grizzly in the first two photographs measured 10' 6" from nose to tail and weighed an estimated 1,000 to 1,200 pounds — unusually large for the vicinity in which it was found, says the USDA Forest Service, but not quite a world record, nor even a record for Alaska. It was killed on October 14, 2001 by U.S. Air Force Airman Theodore Winnen on Hinchinbrook Island, Prince William Sound. The photos were taken by his hunting partner, Staff Sgt. James Urban. Both were stationed at Eielson Air Force Base near Fairbanks at the time.
Though the bear was within 10 yards of the hunters' position and moving towards them when he fired the first shot, Winnen says, it did not charge them, contrary to what the email claims. "I don't know if the wind was in our favor or what," he told the Anchorage Daily News. "We were dressed in camouflage. He might not have seen us." Winnen's weapon was a 338-caliber Winchester Magnum, not a 7mm semi-automatic as alleged. The first bullet pierced the bear's brain but left it standing; five more in the chest brought it down.
No man-eater
Was the bear a man-eater, as claimed in the email? No, says the Forest Service, there is no evidence of that. When asked by the Anchorage Daily News to comment on the horrific final image of what appears to be a partially-eaten human victim, Forest Service spokesman Ray Massey admitted he hadn't even looked at it. "I didn't want to see a photo of the body," he said. "I know it's bogus."
http://urbanlegends.about.com/librar...izzlybear5.htm
The Giant Grizzly Bear
This email tale, circulating constantly in one form or another since November 2001, seems to grow taller year by year. Ironically, the first two snapshots — the ones showing a hunter posing beside the carcass of an incredibly large Alaskan brown bear — are authentic. We know where and when they were taken, and by whom. The origin of the third photo purporting to show the remains of the behemoth's final victim is unknown. It was appended to the already-circulating email in late 2002.
Not quite a world record
In real life, the big grizzly in the first two photographs measured 10' 6" from nose to tail and weighed an estimated 1,000 to 1,200 pounds — unusually large for the vicinity in which it was found, says the USDA Forest Service, but not quite a world record, nor even a record for Alaska. It was killed on October 14, 2001 by U.S. Air Force Airman Theodore Winnen on Hinchinbrook Island, Prince William Sound. The photos were taken by his hunting partner, Staff Sgt. James Urban. Both were stationed at Eielson Air Force Base near Fairbanks at the time.
Though the bear was within 10 yards of the hunters' position and moving towards them when he fired the first shot, Winnen says, it did not charge them, contrary to what the email claims. "I don't know if the wind was in our favor or what," he told the Anchorage Daily News. "We were dressed in camouflage. He might not have seen us." Winnen's weapon was a 338-caliber Winchester Magnum, not a 7mm semi-automatic as alleged. The first bullet pierced the bear's brain but left it standing; five more in the chest brought it down.
No man-eater
Was the bear a man-eater, as claimed in the email? No, says the Forest Service, there is no evidence of that. When asked by the Anchorage Daily News to comment on the horrific final image of what appears to be a partially-eaten human victim, Forest Service spokesman Ray Massey admitted he hadn't even looked at it. "I didn't want to see a photo of the body," he said. "I know it's bogus."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post