what would you would say is better a steel bottom end cvh,zvh or full on 16v zetec all running on efi set up?

tell me your thoughts and view would like to see the out come

 

Youd be a fool not to think anything else but a full on 16V zetec is better.

Better in every way, surely

 

16v would be better i would have thought as it flows more air

 

yes but i think all three kinds of engine being a all steel bottom end and which one would be the most reilable

 

they'll all be the same id guess??

Depends who builds it, and with zetec you've probably got more option with rods and pistons then you have with a cvh, so its hard to say

 

id say either CVH or Zetec not ZVH

 

and why not zvh when they have showen to be good conversions in the past

 

Im personally not a fan of the ZVH , just because im a purist tho


But 16v Zetec would be the better i reckon

 

for once im the same with Rad but with CVH you can still do silly things take Tom Scarlets S1

 

well im still thinking that i may just go all steel bottom end but keep it cvh and get the 1900 block. then at least it looks standard

 

 

If you want reliable then avoid 16v, the 8v head will limit power and hence make it last longer

 

It may or may not be based in fact and be just in the relm of fiction but it is thought that the ZVH with the 8v head is actually better for torque figures low down, but looses steam at high RPM because the head does not flow as well.

But the 16v head is better at the top end (bhp) because of its better better flow, but produces less torque low down.

Could be wrong, but thats the common line of thought with them.