As a followup to this thread,
https://passionford.com/forum/genera...o-results.html

I ran the car again today at a different place, different operator, and superflow rather than dynapack

and the result...





compared to the previous




exactly the same
complete fluke that they are to the same decimal point, and there is a big difference in boost control (the surge like effect on the original graph) and a massive increase in torque, presumably doen to the boost control actually controlling now.

quick vid my brother took



argue away...

 

brilliant fella, defo mad how its come out exactly the same power wise.

nice increase in torque as well

 

Hi mate can u empty your inbox I'm trying to send u a pm about supra diff thanks

 

I do love crystal blue staffs! Top work

 

But the TCF on your 2nd graph will make it look better than what the car is.

Still lower than What () mine was

Steve

 

cracking power that from tt t38,
i could only squeese 447 from mine

 

Done

Cheers mate

Well the TCF cant be that bad if this second dyno gives exactly the same result, and the other dyno it has been run on which was a dynojet gave 496bhp.

For what its worth, i dont give a toss about any of the figures, today was a cliosport forum day which my brother was running in. i went along for a watch and got persuaded to run.

 

I don't think these turbo's are T38 - i have a feeling they are bigger as thats a lot of power and torque

 

Dan is correct though, he has the same as Steve and I, Turbo Technics Man sized T38's

 

hi fraser ive tried to pm u ,but cant?
basically ive bought a mk3 supra diff and want to know what is needed or modify to make it fit,i was told i need the flanges made if so who did yours and what did it cost

thanks

 

Excellent power from the T38 mate, bet that's nice on the road.

 

What boost control is on it ?

 

Great result matey.

 

ive replied to you over on escortcosworth.com mate.

Cheers. yes its entertaining
Currently its running a turbosmart eboost street but if im honest it is a heap of shit

Thanks Glenn

 

If the first one is correct then its over 1000 rpm lower at peak power than the other one?

Id suggest that the rpm scale is out although the cross over point is correct so something not right..



cheers danny

 

Like I said, boost control is now actually controlling. If anything the dynapack rpm reading may be slightly out, with the dodgy boost control and the two graphs desperate it is difficult to tell where they meet. Not sure on the top line of 7400 rpm on the dynapack either, seems a little high but I'm not sure off the top of my head exactly where the rev limiter is set. Maybe tony can answer that one.

 

Nice power and torque figures but how come it only revs to just over 6000 rpm?

 

Hi Im Looking at what diffs to choose what cost and how much for the conversion?

Cheers

 

RPM scale has got to be out on the first graph.

I know Tony set my limiter just over 7400 so would be no different for Fraser's

Steve

 

Great figures, I bet that is savage on the road.

The Superflow at EFI is apparently very accurate, more so than others

 

nice results, and the same to the decimal point, whats the chances of that, id be getting a lotto ticket mate