When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
General Car Related Discussion.To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.
same as mine as i said the cable runs at to much of an angle the square needs to be up higher im going to get mine modded i think as i dont wont my cable snapping! it still gets the full range of movement and dosent feel tight but im still not that happy with it iver!
same as mine as i said the cable runs at to much of an angle the square needs to be up higher im going to get mine modded i think as i dont wont my cable snapping! it still gets the full range of movement and dosent feel tight but im still not that happy with it iver!
But we shouldn't have too
As said it does work, and smoothly but im also worried about the cable snapping.
i no we shouldent but after the time it took to even get that one lol id rather just take mine to andy robinsons and get it done the same day! if we had stainless wire at work id do it my self
I'm stating that it's not a Airtec inlet or bracket as rsmat stated. And I asked who made the bracket
There made by a fabricator that blue sprint use who i think is near too there work shop mate there is only a problem as not many have been used with the small turbo throttle body when i ordered my manifold only one other had been ordered that way by m.a.d and they sorted the cable bracket them selfs
but its meant to be the best flowing inlet out there
It probably is the best when youre seeing figures of 650hp plus , but the hart inlet isnt as responsive as a st esc inlet for 500hp applications , hence why i swapped .
It probably is the best when youre seeing figures of 650hp plus , but the hart inlet isnt as responsive as a st esc inlet for 500hp applications , hence why i swapped .
not what i was told thats why i sold my st esc one and got a hart one
but its meant to be the best flowing inlet out there
It probably is the best when youre seeing figures of 650hp plus , but the hart inlet isnt as responsive as a st esc inlet for 500hp applications , hence why i swapped .
Last edited by focus 4x4; Jan 24, 2012 at 07:52 PM.
From: In the unit, building a 450bhp Time Attack Focus!
There is a difference between flow capability and throttle response. Just because a plenum has the volume to not become a restriction in producing power it does not mean that the throttle response is not compromised. Swedish plenums used to be noticeably less responsive at lower engine speeds but would make more power at the top end of the rev range. There are very few modifications that can be performed to engines that will provide a global gain without there being some form of compromise.
It probably is the best when youre seeing figures of 650hp plus , but the hart inlet isnt as responsive as a st esc inlet for 500hp applications , hence why i swapped .
I guess everyone has different opinions mine has a 500bhp set up and before i ordered mine i asked the person who maps mine if i would benefit from a hart over my st esc inlet and was told yes
In the booklet that comes with a Hart, a dyno seesion showed a engine that made 378bhp on a std TB and std inlet made 411bhp on the Hart but lost power upto 4500rpm