Which bolts do you not replace with...
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,136
Likes: 60
From: Tyne and Wear
Stainless steel??
When replacing all underbody bolts with new, which are the bolts NOT to be replaced by Stainless steel?
I have heard a few horror story's of nuts and bolts working themselves free as they don't have the same 'bite' as mild steel. Also of them actually shearing off as they are much more brittle,

thanks
When replacing all underbody bolts with new, which are the bolts NOT to be replaced by Stainless steel?
I have heard a few horror story's of nuts and bolts working themselves free as they don't have the same 'bite' as mild steel. Also of them actually shearing off as they are much more brittle,
thanks
It's nothing to do with bolts "biting", it is to do with ductility, bendiness in normal language.
SS is a far stronger material than mild steel, but it is also much much more brittle so would break instead of bend.
You will be perfectly safe with all the underbody bolts, I would just steer clear of things subject to loads of high frequency vibration like brakes.
tabetha
SS is a far stronger material than mild steel, but it is also much much more brittle so would break instead of bend.
You will be perfectly safe with all the underbody bolts, I would just steer clear of things subject to loads of high frequency vibration like brakes.
tabetha
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,136
Likes: 60
From: Tyne and Wear
id just use standard zinc plated bolts myself yes they dont look as good but i wouldnt risk using stainless ones for the fact they can break in use but can also break when being undone causing all sorts of headaches when trying to dismantle something as they are very difficult to drill out
The use of mild steel is perfectly ok for this use, typically having 0.05% - 0.15% carbon, a low carbon steel could be used also slightly softer but more ductile, has 0.16% - 0.29% carbon content as it's main alloying constituent, mild can also be carburized where needed for extra hardness, low carbon steels can also develop luder bands, these are like a elastic stretch it a certain amount and it will stretch, too much and it will break, shoudln't be stretched at all as weakens them, leading to deformation called luder bands.
So in short mild is better, anything over 2% carbon by the way is considered as cast!!
I am referring to everday obtainable metals as ther eis a bewildering array of treatments both hot and cold as well as gas teatments that can produce massively different properties compared to the same untreated materials.
Mild is a safe bolt for this application.
tabetha
So in short mild is better, anything over 2% carbon by the way is considered as cast!!
I am referring to everday obtainable metals as ther eis a bewildering array of treatments both hot and cold as well as gas teatments that can produce massively different properties compared to the same untreated materials.
Mild is a safe bolt for this application.
tabetha
It's nothing to do with bolts "biting", it is to do with ductility, bendiness in normal language.
SS is a far stronger material than mild steel, but it is also much much more brittle so would break instead of bend.
You will be perfectly safe with all the underbody bolts, I would just steer clear of things subject to loads of high frequency vibration like brakes.
tabetha
SS is a far stronger material than mild steel, but it is also much much more brittle so would break instead of bend.
You will be perfectly safe with all the underbody bolts, I would just steer clear of things subject to loads of high frequency vibration like brakes.
tabetha


Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
krypton
General Car Related Discussion.
3
Sep 23, 2015 07:29 PM
Vacuman
General Car Related Discussion.
1
Sep 22, 2015 12:09 PM



Found some available 