General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

our latest truck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 10:34 PM
  #1  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default our latest truck

we have just finished building this, it took quite a bit of working out.

what do you think? we had to extend it too




Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 10:57 PM
  #2  
turnover's Avatar
turnover
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 34
From: midlands
Default

yeh like it ,was gonna do one like that myself but couldnt be arsed to extend the chassis
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 11:16 PM
  #3  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default

Originally Posted by turnover
yeh like it ,was gonna do one like that myself but couldnt be arsed to extend the chassis
to be honest the stretch was the easy part, some folded steel, new brake lines, handbrake cable extention (so a std replacment can be used if needed) and an extended prop with extra bearing

building the body was about 80% measuring and checking and 20% making

top result though, works fantastic
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 11:41 PM
  #4  
Iain Mac's Avatar
Iain Mac
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 6
From: Scotland
Default

The rear overhang looks very long - is it still within the limits?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 11:53 PM
  #5  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default

Originally Posted by Iain Mac
The rear overhang looks very long - is it still within the limits?
its actually quite a bit within the limits, its a bit decieving but because its a crew cab its a good long wheelbase its allowed quite a bit of overhang
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 03:06 AM
  #6  
CRAIG HAYTER's Avatar
CRAIG HAYTER
BANNED
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 0
From: Far away from you so it doesnt matter
Default

Dan thats a belter

Last edited by CRAIG HAYTER; Oct 15, 2009 at 03:07 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 07:51 AM
  #7  
alistairolsen's Avatar
alistairolsen
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 8
From: Glasgow/Oban
Default

Been through the IVA?
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 15, 2009 | 07:55 AM
  #8  
white2lsr's Avatar
white2lsr
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 1
From: cumbria
Default

Top work
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 07:59 AM
  #9  
born_again_kid's Avatar
born_again_kid
91 FRST
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Bedford
Default

How much does it weigh empty. I have a crew cab with a steel pick up body and it goes just over 2.5tonnes empty leaving me a a little over 940 kilos payload before i hit the 3.5 tonne GVW.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #10  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default

it weighs 2380, which is a lot but for a crew cab tilt and slide its very light
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #11  
Graceland's Avatar
Graceland
Team HOTHOT!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,065
Likes: 1
From: Huddersfield Drives: Trains ;)
Default

Dan - Superb bit of kit

Slightly off topic though, Next eyar I'm going to be looking at a flatbed/beavertail for transporting my car about to trackdays and Nurburgring trips (not using the Cossie on the road next year) - nothing too fancy or expensive but half decent enough to get the job done - something like an old LDV or Transit GVW 3.5T or if needed in order to not exceed the GVW, an Iveco 7.5T or equivelant.

Would I need to have it tacho fitted for personal use, or would that only need to be done if I was to use it for recovery work aswell?

Last edited by Graceland; Oct 15, 2009 at 09:29 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:31 AM
  #12  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default

Originally Posted by Graceland
Dan - Superb bit of kit

Slightly off topic though, Next eyar I'm going to be looking at a flatbed/beavertail for transporting my car about to trackdays and Nurburgring trips (not using the Cossie on the road next year). Would I need to have it tacho fitted for personal use, or would that only need to be done if I was to use it for recovery work aswell?
if its no heavier than 3500kg then you can do what you like with it, no tacho or operators licence or anything, its once you get above 3 and a half ton you need loads of official crap
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #13  
Graceland's Avatar
Graceland
Team HOTHOT!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,065
Likes: 1
From: Huddersfield Drives: Trains ;)
Default

Ahhh Cheers - Looking like a lightweight 3.5t unit then is required - any tips on what to steer clear of (base vehicle wise) and what is considered to be a good tool?
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #14  
born_again_kid's Avatar
born_again_kid
91 FRST
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Bedford
Default

If it weighs 2380kg Does that not leave you with a payload of 1120 kg including passengers. I only ask as thats the reason I didnt convert mine. I would have thought the Mondeo would make it overloaded. Dont mean be negative as its a top class conversion just looking at the practacality of it.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 10:06 AM
  #15  
bigal1978's Avatar
bigal1978
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 0
From: devon
Default

Originally Posted by born_again_kid
If it weighs 2380kg Does that not leave you with a payload of 1120 kg including passengers. I only ask as thats the reason I didnt convert mine. I would have thought the Mondeo would make it overloaded. Dont mean be negative as its a top class conversion just looking at the practacality of it.
not thought
it is over loaded
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #16  
alistairolsen's Avatar
alistairolsen
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 8
From: Glasgow/Oban
Default

infact with 6 people in the drew cab at 70kg each you could only have a 70kg car on the back.....
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #17  
white2lsr's Avatar
white2lsr
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 1
From: cumbria
Default

Originally Posted by Graceland
Would I need to have it tacho fitted for personal use, or would that only need to be done if I was to use it for recovery work aswell?
Recovery vehicles are exhempt from tacho rules
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #18  
Graceland's Avatar
Graceland
Team HOTHOT!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,065
Likes: 1
From: Huddersfield Drives: Trains ;)
Default

Originally Posted by white2lsr
Recovery vehicles are exhempt from tacho rules
Only if they are operating within 100km/62 mile radius of the resgistered base for the vehicle.............According to the DVLA website that is.

Last edited by Graceland; Oct 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 10:26 AM
  #19  
white2lsr's Avatar
white2lsr
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 1
From: cumbria
Default

And not many will
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #20  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default

To be honest when we were selling our last slider. We had a good few people ring us up and ask about making them a crew cab

We've got bids on it so people seem to want it
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 12:17 PM
  #21  
kal1's Avatar
kal1
Regular Contributor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Brumingham
Default

Very nice mate.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #22  
MrMPuk's Avatar
MrMPuk
Part of the Furniture
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dan1281
its actually quite a bit within the limits, its a bit decieving but because its a crew cab its a good long wheelbase its allowed quite a bit of overhang
Isn't the max overhang 40% of the wheelbase? That looks like it's slightly over that especially with the lights being set so far in.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 05:17 PM
  #23  
Iain Mac's Avatar
Iain Mac
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 6
From: Scotland
Default

Originally Posted by MrMPuk
Isn't the max overhang 40% of the wheelbase? That looks like it's slightly over that especially with the lights being set so far in.
I think it is still 60% of wheelbase for a rigid, but the payload quoted above could be an issue.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #24  
andyt's Avatar
andyt
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 0
From: Cumbria
Default

Originally Posted by alistairolsen
Been through the IVA?

2nd that aswell
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #25  
Roscco's Avatar
Roscco
Livin' [H]ard & Fast
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh
Default

Nice work mate, never knew people build these themselves
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #26  
banhambuilt's Avatar
banhambuilt
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
From: crewe,cheshire
Default

overhang can not be over 75% of the total wheelbase


dave
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 07:06 PM
  #27  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default

its a long basterd when you're on tight roads, the body is 16'6

and as for the iva, its only been stretched, we did it properly though with an extra prop bearing, its been through an MOT since we finished it aswell
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #28  
alistairolsen's Avatar
alistairolsen
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 8
From: Glasgow/Oban
Default

Originally Posted by Dan1281
its a long basterd when you're on tight roads, the body is 16'6

and as for the iva, its only been stretched, we did it properly though with an extra prop bearing, its been through an MOT since we finished it aswell
Modified chassis means it needs an IVA test and passing an mot is of no consequence
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #29  
kev 3dr's Avatar
kev 3dr
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
From: widnes
Default

Gracey if its "not fire hire or reward" you dont need a Tacho only tax and MOT and normal insurance hence horse boxes and proper race teams gettin away with paying normal vehicle tax etc !!!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #30  
kris-rs's Avatar
kris-rs
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: bollock deep in walsall
Default

looks good
im after a crew cab tranny recovery truck looking to pay about 7k
do you know of any going
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #31  
Miller 3's Avatar
Miller 3
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,407
Likes: 12
From: rainham/kent
Default

Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:59 PM
  #32  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default

Originally Posted by alistairolsen
Modified chassis means it needs an IVA test and passing an mot is of no consequence
it doesnt say that on the website, just says as long as it doesnt exceed a set overall length

and modifying a chassis could be from welding a bracket to it to replacing it completely and it running on twin trailer axles

its taxed tested and insured, its legal
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 10:21 PM
  #33  
markk's Avatar
markk
10K+ Poster!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,639
Likes: 105
From: Lancs
Default

great looking tool again pal, totally useless though to anyone in the know or wanting to be within the law.

stop fooking about with the little ones, build a proper one, you obv have the skills and patients.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 11:13 PM
  #34  
Dan1281's Avatar
Dan1281
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: wigan
Default

Originally Posted by markk
great looking tool again pal, totally useless though to anyone in the know or wanting to be within the law.

stop fooking about with the little ones, build a proper one, you obv have the skills and patients.
people want them though, there is 9 different people bidding on it at the moment, its only been on a day

this one is only the second one we have built, heres the first one



as you can see the new revised one slides off more giving a better loading angle, the red one weighed in at 2240 and was full steel, i reckon we could make a day cab with aluminium weighing in at 2050ish

but if the crew cab sells for good money then its worth making more

everybody who has seen it has said how good it is and looks like a factory job when its really just me and my uncle in a old barn lol but its attention to detail that counts, we're really picky about that, no spikey edges or nasty open ends of box section sticking out
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 11:58 PM
  #35  
michael harbour's Avatar
michael harbour
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: scotland
Default

Originally Posted by Dan1281
we have just finished building this, it took quite a bit of working out.

what do you think? we had to extend it too




is this for sale?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 08:19 AM
  #36  
DazC's Avatar
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

people will always want a 3500kg truck and once they own it, it's up to them to stay under the gross vehicle weight. With only a payload of 1100kg this is pretty useless for anything heavier than a series 2. If you can get the pay load up to 1500kg it'd be a good truck that would be hard to beat..
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 08:22 AM
  #37  
alistairolsen's Avatar
alistairolsen
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 8
From: Glasgow/Oban
Default

Originally Posted by Dan1281
it doesnt say that on the website, just says as long as it doesnt exceed a set overall length

and modifying a chassis could be from welding a bracket to it to replacing it completely and it running on twin trailer axles

its taxed tested and insured, its legal

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring...le/DG_10014199

Specifically:

If less than eight points are scored or a second-hand or modified chassis or altered monocoque bodyshell is used an Individual Vehicle Approval (IVA), enhanced single vehicle approval (ESVA), single vehicle approval (SVA) or motorcycle single vehicle approval (MSVA) certificate will be required to register the vehicle. A 'Q' prefix registration number will be allocated.
You are quite right that the definition of a modified chassis leaves a lot to be desired, and a lot of people dont bother, but to extend one I would say is a significant modification (which already has a precendent from the landrover boys)

No, that's where your wrong. To insure a car you merely need a chassis number and whatever details you choose to give. The accuracy of those details decides whether that is legal or not.

An MOT only determines if 52 points on the vehicle are in working condition, it is not concerned with correct registration, examination or modification, or even ensuring road worthiness.

Finally a tax disk means you have presented an MOT and insurance cert for a vehicle for which you hold the (now invalid) V5 and paid a fee to use it on the road.

None of these change the fact that the vehicle is now illegally registered!

Originally Posted by DazC
people will always want a 3500kg truck and once they own it, it's up to them to stay under the gross vehicle weight. With only a payload of 1100kg this is pretty useless for anything heavier than a series 2. If you can get the pay load up to 1500kg it'd be a good truck that would be hard to beat..
remember that payload is 3500 gross, so that includes passengers. 6 guys at a conservative 70kg each are 420kg, so if you want the full compliment of people aboard you're down to 700kg...

Last edited by alistairolsen; Oct 16, 2009 at 08:23 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 08:28 AM
  #38  
utternutter's Avatar
utternutter
BANNED
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: hampshire
Default

personally id build one on a 5t iveco etc, the front wheel drive fixed bed french gear etc is ultra great as low weight and you can make the beds low as the rear chassis just bolts to the front, if you can make light 3500 trucks that look ace you will earn well out of them, a lot of the big boys are going back to them
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #39  
DazC's Avatar
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

Originally Posted by alistairolsen
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring...le/DG_10014199

Specifically:

You are quite right that the definition of a modified chassis leaves a lot to be desired, and a lot of people dont bother, but to extend one I would say is a significant modification (which already has a precendent from the landrover boys)

No, that's where your wrong. To insure a car you merely need a chassis number and whatever details you choose to give. The accuracy of those details decides whether that is legal or not.

An MOT only determines if 52 points on the vehicle are in working condition, it is not concerned with correct registration, examination or modification, or even ensuring road worthiness.

Finally a tax disk means you have presented an MOT and insurance cert for a vehicle for which you hold the (now invalid) V5 and paid a fee to use it on the road.

None of these change the fact that the vehicle is now illegally registered!



remember that payload is 3500 gross, so that includes passengers. 6 guys at a conservative 70kg each are 420kg, so if you want the full compliment of people aboard you're down to 700kg...
You seem to confuse the term pay load and gross vehicle weight. These are 2 seperate measures totally. If the vehicle had a pay load of 3500kg then it can carry legally 3.5 tonnes. A pay load is a pay load and is what the vehicle can carry before it reaches it's limit. A 3500kg GVW vehicle that weighs 2000kg will have a pay load of 1500kg only. This particular vehicle in the first post only has a pay load of 1100kg so a standard empty series 2 RST and 1 person will put it on it's limit, which is it's gross vehicle weight of 3500kg.

Gross vehicle weight is the maximum the vehicle can weigh including all tools, equipment, occupants, fuel, spare wheels and goods or anything else carried in the vehicle.

Gross train weight is another thing all together again, as are individual axle weights.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 10:02 PM
  #40  
Glenn_'s Avatar
Glenn_
Glennvestite
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 62,772
Likes: 1,050
From: Darlington county durham
Default

Thats a proper truck.
Reply



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:37 PM.