General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

losing unsprung weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 04:12 PM
  #1  
Spiky's Avatar
Spiky
Thread Starter
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff
Default losing unsprung weight

i know people go on about this,

but what advantage will i give?

i've just changed wheels and my new wheels are about 5kgs lighter eachwheel ( new ones weight is 4.7kg)

what difference will i see?

Last edited by Spiky; Sep 7, 2009 at 04:18 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #2  
xr2wishy's Avatar
xr2wishy
Bodger of Blackburn
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 23
From: blackburn
Default

much better handling, unsprung weight just sits on the road with no control of how it reacts, bits that are always the same height and weight without weight shifting for better handling cause big problems.
you can't alter the car to accomodate how wheels work really, but you can tighten the shocks and stiffen the springs to make the shell move less, there is no give in unsprung weight.

probably not the best eplaination, but it's all positive.
the ideal is to have everything suspended on springs but this can't happen as contact is needed to the road on a rotating wheel.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #3  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Contrary to popular belief the main job (from a handling point of view) of your suspension isnt suspending the car, its keep the wheel in contact with the ground, less unsprung weight means less for the suspension to have to work against.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #4  
Spiky's Avatar
Spiky
Thread Starter
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff
Default

ah chip, that would make sense
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 04:32 PM
  #5  
Spiky's Avatar
Spiky
Thread Starter
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff
Default

Originally Posted by xr2wishy
much better handling, unsprung weight just sits on the road with no control of how it reacts, bits that are always the same height and weight without weight shifting for better handling cause big problems.
you can't alter the car to accomodate how wheels work really, but you can tighten the shocks and stiffen the springs to make the shell move less, there is no give in unsprung weight.

probably not the best eplaination, but it's all positive.
the ideal is to have everything suspended on springs but this can't happen as contact is needed to the road on a rotating wheel.

cheers for that
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 04:48 PM
  #6  
fuzzy's Avatar
fuzzy
14000+ post superhero
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 17,461
Likes: 490
From: upside down in a field
Default

would a difference of say 2.5kg per corner saving in unsprung weight be a noticeable improvement in handling on a mildly tuned road car?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #7  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by fuzzy
would a difference of say 2.5kg per corner saving in unsprung weight be a noticeable improvement in handling on a mildly tuned road car?
No, just like losing say 30KG out of the spring weight wouldnt be noticeable on the road either realistically, anyone saying it would be is either a formula 1 test driver, or would also say a placebo made their car quicker, us mere mortals wouldnt notice it.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #8  
Spiky's Avatar
Spiky
Thread Starter
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
No, just like losing say 30KG out of the spring weight wouldnt be noticeable on the road either realistically, anyone saying it would be is either a formula 1 test driver, or would also say a placebo made their car quicker, us mere mortals wouldnt notice it.
i'm looking to do a 1:10 around combe once these are fitted
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:05 PM
  #9  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Spiky
i'm looking to do a 1:10 around combe once these are fitted
You have more chance of getting picked for the harlem globe trotters.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #10  
Spiky's Avatar
Spiky
Thread Starter
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
You have more chance of getting picked for the harlem globe trotters.

i was actually on the phone to them a hour ago
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:10 PM
  #11  
BM08's Avatar
BM08
Professional Waffler
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 27,883
Likes: 7
From: west midlands
Default

Take that sunstrip off, you might achieve your 1:10 then only messing
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #12  
Luca's Avatar
Luca
Lukesville
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,676
Likes: 5
From: Portsmouth
Default

I thought you meant how can you loose those chubby legs


Wheels im led to believe in being lighter will give benefit of
1) Making your wallet MUCH lighter.
2) Less energy will be required to accelerate the wheel.

Plimsoles help to! The lightest racing shoe on the market FACT
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #13  
rstdave's Avatar
rstdave
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 0
From: Bristol/Bath
Default

Every little bit helps as they say......personally i wouldn't bother with saving grams and the odd kilo here and there if you're not in some sort of race series with 1 make cars or something. Is it really gonna make that much difference against the massive variety of cars you get at trackdays?!
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:22 PM
  #14  
Luca's Avatar
Luca
Lukesville
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,676
Likes: 5
From: Portsmouth
Default

Originally Posted by rstdave
Every little bit helps as they say......personally i wouldn't bother with saving grams and the odd kilo here and there if you're not in some sort of race series with 1 make cars or something. Is it really gonna make that much difference against the massive variety of cars you get at trackdays?!

Power to weight WINS
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:24 PM
  #15  
Spiky's Avatar
Spiky
Thread Starter
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff
Default

Originally Posted by Luca
I thought you meant how can you loose those chubby legs


Wheels im led to believe in being lighter will give benefit of
1) Making your wallet MUCH lighter.
2) Less energy will be required to accelerate the wheel.

Plimsoles help to! The lightest racing shoe on the market FACT

firstly, if you saw my leg's you would see how far from chubby they are

Ł10 a wheel hardly hurts the wallet
and yeah, confirms what chip says above,

and power to weight is the only reason my car is mildly quick on track
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #16  
Drunken Master's Avatar
Drunken Master
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Default

I have been told that unsprung weight is like losing 4x's the amount of sprung weight from the car. Should notice a difference in braking and acceleration as less energy needs to be expended to move it. 5kg's per wheel is a good saving! Noticed a difference when changing to lightweight wheels on my car but that was 10kg per corner.

Last edited by Drunken Master; Sep 7, 2009 at 05:34 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #17  
fuzzy's Avatar
fuzzy
14000+ post superhero
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 17,461
Likes: 490
From: upside down in a field
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
No, just like losing say 30KG out of the spring weight wouldnt be noticeable on the road either realistically, anyone saying it would be is either a formula 1 test driver, or would also say a placebo made their car quicker, us mere mortals wouldnt notice it.
over on e30zone ive always argued against the "unsprung weight" argument when the bufties dismiss 17" alpina reps in favour of 15"bbs alloys. the difference is 17.5kg compared to 15kg, both with tyres. "they ruin the handling" etc etc.

Last edited by fuzzy; Sep 7, 2009 at 05:37 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #18  
thebigmacmoomin's Avatar
thebigmacmoomin
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 30
From: Devon
Default

You can get light weight wheels nuts aswell. Every little helps.

Andy
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 06:36 PM
  #19  
TT300's Avatar
TT300
400 N/A BHP
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Ash, Hampshire
Default

What wheels are they, C5 steels?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 07:35 PM
  #20  
cossiemanden's Avatar
cossiemanden
DANISH cosworth abuser
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: Holbćk, denmark
Default

If you take 5kg off pr wheel, then it will eaquel to about 80kg inside the car ca.
unofficial you say 5kg x 4 = 20kg x 4 = 80kg inside the car.
2,5kg x 4 = 10kg x 4 = 40kg inside car etc etc
I got this from an ex F1 driver (old friend) , dont know how much you can use this off course, but seems right.
It´s rotating mass so better for acc and breaking
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 07:51 PM
  #21  
orionmojo's Avatar
orionmojo
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by fuzzy
over on e30zone ive always argued against the "unsprung weight" argument when the bufties dismiss 17" alpina reps in favour of 15"bbs alloys. the difference is 17.5kg compared to 15kg, both with tyres. "they ruin the handling" etc etc.
I agree with the weight argument but thats not the only thing that can ruin handling.

Escort turbos drive so much better on 16"s than they do on 17"s. They just do.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #22  
fuzzy's Avatar
fuzzy
14000+ post superhero
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 17,461
Likes: 490
From: upside down in a field
Default

its a bit harsher due to the lower profile tyre but i prefer that. the rolling radius is the same.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #23  
orionmojo's Avatar
orionmojo
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by fuzzy
its a bit harsher due to the lower profile tyre but i prefer that. the rolling radius is the same.
yeah i spose.

but they just do i cant explain it.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 08:39 PM
  #24  
Drunken Master's Avatar
Drunken Master
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fuzzy
over on e30zone ive always argued against the "unsprung weight" argument when the bufties dismiss 17" alpina reps in favour of 15"bbs alloys. the difference is 17.5kg compared to 15kg, both with tyres. "they ruin the handling" etc etc.
I agree with them not just because the bbs are a much better quality wheel. Rep's are normally made of poor alloy. But the weight of a 17" tyre with a stiff sidewall is at least 10kg's so your weight doesn't add up. The 15" wheels will make the car more nimble and not as crashy as the 17's.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #25  
fuzzy's Avatar
fuzzy
14000+ post superhero
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 17,461
Likes: 490
From: upside down in a field
Default

both wheels were weighed so theres no question of not adding up, thats what they were . an alpina rep with tyre and a 15" bbs also with tyre. there was a 2.5kg difference. my argument was that 2.5kg difference in unsprung weight would not be noticable on a road car.

Last edited by fuzzy; Sep 7, 2009 at 09:34 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #26  
Drunken Master's Avatar
Drunken Master
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fuzzy
both wheels were weighed so theres no question of not adding up, thats what they were . an alpina rep with tyre and a 15" bbs also with tyre. there was a 2.5kg difference. my argument was that 2.5kg difference in unsprung weight would not be noticable on a road car.
Could be right weight wise just 7.5kg for a 17" rep is pretty light. Thing is the threads about a track car and 5kg per wheel WILL make a difference no doubt about it.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 10:05 PM
  #27  
rstdave's Avatar
rstdave
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 0
From: Bristol/Bath
Default

Originally Posted by orionmojo
yeah i spose.

but they just do i cant explain it.
Something else i don't agree with lol, always ran with 15's and after swapping to 17's (lightweight oz superleggera's) i really don't find the car drives any worse. I use the car on road and track and if i'm honest the extra width etc helps with traction on track i find. Hear loads of peole speak about the difference between 15's and 17's on rst's being night and day but i've just never found that.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2009 | 10:16 PM
  #28  
christophe's Avatar
christophe
15000
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnshire
Default

Remeber the 4x weight stuff is only for rotating components, wheels, brake discs, driveshafts, it doesn't apply to all the unsprung stuff, brake calipers etc
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wowk
General Car Related Discussion.
4
Mar 30, 2021 07:49 PM
steerfromdarear
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
28
Jan 29, 2016 06:14 PM
liamT74
General Car Related Discussion.
10
Sep 23, 2015 10:24 PM
pabloXR
General Car Related Discussion.
9
Sep 21, 2015 12:42 PM
Flatlinedan
Technical help Q & A
3
Sep 18, 2015 12:41 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:24 AM.