whats a classic shape 2.0 impretza like on fuel?

 

Lee's parents had a 2.0 137bhp non turbo scooby and it was pretty bad on fuel, and also ridiculously slow to boot.
think the main problem being it revved quite high anyway whilst driving yet it hit the limiter ridiculously early ( almost as low as their a3 diesel )

Sarah

 

All Subaru's are terrible on fuel My sister had a 2.0 sport and when she borrowed my Legacy turbo she said the turbo was actually better on fuel.

 

Must be worst of both worlds, slow and thirsty
Why people buy the non turbos I don't know lol.

 

high 20s, there is no reason to have a car THAT slow which is still shit on fuel IMHO

 

i have heard they they suffer real bad with turbo lag

 

Up to the limiter mate

 

like any permanent 4x4 they will suffer from poor economy caused by transmission drag. good cars though, very well built

 

hmmmm, it's the full time 4x4 i want it for with car like manners and fairly reliable is what i want! a turbo scooby is a bit excessive for what ineed it for!

thanks anyways!

 

terrible on fuel and v v v slow; quite well built, but much better motors out there

 

Used to enjoy racing my mates 2.0 Sport (turbo replica) in my 1.6 Mk3 Escort as I would always win..... and I could pretend to myself it was a real one

 

The only N/A Subaru Impreza worth having is 06-07 model. Other then that they are pointless, unless you drive 300 days in a year in snow.

 

great car if your a farmer,,,,,,, apart from that bollox to having one,,,, be better off buying a escort and putting a hole in the fuel tank IMO,,,,,,, would be better on fuel too im sure