I just been VTECH'ed!!
I went out in my mates Integra SiR, i forgot what engine he said it has because he was spouted off all this honda talk whilst i was trying to hold on for dear life
says its around 190bhp?
It went fookin well either way
nice sharp brakes, had some kind of sus kit and shocks on it so it cornered well aswell, nice motor
says its around 190bhp? It went fookin well either way
nice sharp brakes, had some kind of sus kit and shocks on it so it cornered well aswell, nice motor
I think there a b18c1 which is basically a 1.8 170bhp motor which are also in the civic vti estates and 5 door hatch's. As for saying it's basically a type-r engine he's talking bollox the only thing that it share's with a type-r engine is that there both 1.8's lol
Originally Posted by Alps Pacino
I think there a b18c1 which is basically a 1.8 170bhp motor which are also in the civic vti estates and 5 door hatch's. As for saying it's basically a type-r engine he's talking bollox the only thing that it share's with a type-r engine is that there both 1.8's lol
Heres a youtube link he sent me just now
His car is on the second run so you dont need to watch all 3mins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAVQpAXWKTw
Car hes against is a turbo so he didnt do too bad against it
Trending Topics
Dave_YD
The b18c5 which is the type-r motor makes 187bhp standard and is totally different from the other b18c motor's. So to get 190bhp from 1 i'm gessing he would be needing at least cam's and head work plus the obviouse breathing mods.
The b18c5 which is the type-r motor makes 187bhp standard and is totally different from the other b18c motor's. So to get 190bhp from 1 i'm gessing he would be needing at least cam's and head work plus the obviouse breathing mods.
Originally Posted by matts1
I own a CTR, to be honest i like it but it is NO substitute for the feel of boost coming on
But does blow up less than my old fords
But does blow up less than my old fords

This isnt a WOW OH MY GOD i want a vtech post, just saying nippy cars these and i was impressed, first ride in one
matts1
The problem with the way the civic feel's when it come's on the vtec is that there better off vtec than the older b series so the jump in power doent feel as agressive. I found the civis boaring and think the dc2 integra is far better as a drivers car.
The problem with the way the civic feel's when it come's on the vtec is that there better off vtec than the older b series so the jump in power doent feel as agressive. I found the civis boaring and think the dc2 integra is far better as a drivers car.
you wouldnt buy one to a caravan if you had one tho! youd buy one to rev to 9k in every gear! my mates just finished his civic vti, thor racing mapped it revs to 10k! sounds awsome!!
Originally Posted by NEEDFORSPEED
you wouldnt buy one to a caravan if you had one tho! youd buy one to rev to 9k in every gear! my mates just finished his civic vti, thor racing mapped it revs to 10k! sounds awsome!! 

Originally Posted by Nash
Originally Posted by Billy_RST
V-tec's are poo. Sorry has to be said.
Friend of mine has one. When it 'kicks in' it just makes a louder noise!
Friend of mine has one. When it 'kicks in' it just makes a louder noise!

Originally Posted by Billy_RST
V-tec's are poo. Sorry has to be said.
Friend of mine has one. When it 'kicks in' it just makes a louder noise!
Friend of mine has one. When it 'kicks in' it just makes a louder noise!

v techs certainly have no torque, don't like the constant rev the balls stuff myself, but some do like it, ace engineering though.
I towed a caravan 120 miles with a v tech, never again!!
tabetha
ps YES putting a towbar on cossie!!
I towed a caravan 120 miles with a v tech, never again!!
tabetha
ps YES putting a towbar on cossie!!
Billy_RST
I would rather have the car that does a low 14s 1/4 as standard, voted best ever FWD handling car ever made. Will still make standard power after 109k miles and take a pasting after pasting on track.
So do tell me whats so fucking good about an RST? Seeing as a CRX was making more power Nasp from a 1.6 than an RST did with a turbo.
I would rather have the car that does a low 14s 1/4 as standard, voted best ever FWD handling car ever made. Will still make standard power after 109k miles and take a pasting after pasting on track.
So do tell me whats so fucking good about an RST? Seeing as a CRX was making more power Nasp from a 1.6 than an RST did with a turbo.
RS Turbo:
Better Looks
Better Feel
Better Interior
Better Experience
Has a Turbo
Easy to work on
Anyway, i dont ant to start an argument about these wank hondas.
But if your such a closet honda lover, why you got a cossie and not a Civic Type-R?
Better Looks
Better Feel
Better Interior
Better Experience
Has a Turbo
Easy to work on
Anyway, i dont ant to start an argument about these wank hondas.
But if your such a closet honda lover, why you got a cossie and not a Civic Type-R?
i used to work at honda in exeter driving all kinds of honda from garage to garage i had some fun in the the accord type r flat out and one early civic type r but most honda are boring.yes they rev and rev but they are still granny carriers
Originally Posted by Billy_RST
RS Turbo:
Better Looks - Nope
Better Feel - Lmfao Nope
Better Interior - Yes unless you are talking about the Type-R
Better Experience - Nope
Has a Turbo - Yes give you that.
Easy to work on - In what way?
Anyway, i dont ant to start an argument about these wank hondas.
But if your such a closet honda lover, why you got a cossie and not a Civic Type-R?
Better Looks - Nope
Better Feel - Lmfao Nope
Better Interior - Yes unless you are talking about the Type-R
Better Experience - Nope
Has a Turbo - Yes give you that.
Easy to work on - In what way?
Anyway, i dont ant to start an argument about these wank hondas.
But if your such a closet honda lover, why you got a cossie and not a Civic Type-R?
You have obviously never driven an Integra and everyone can see this from your reply. Oh and i have owned one whats why i can comment, i have also been in plenty of RST over the years.
Originally Posted by Nash
Originally Posted by Billy_RST
RS Turbo:
Better Looks - Nope
Better Feel - Lmfao Nope
Better Interior - Yes unless you are talking about the Type-R
Better Experience - Nope
Has a Turbo - Yes give you that.
Easy to work on - In what way?
Anyway, i dont ant to start an argument about these wank hondas.
But if your such a closet honda lover, why you got a cossie and not a Civic Type-R?
Better Looks - Nope
Better Feel - Lmfao Nope
Better Interior - Yes unless you are talking about the Type-R
Better Experience - Nope
Has a Turbo - Yes give you that.
Easy to work on - In what way?
Anyway, i dont ant to start an argument about these wank hondas.
But if your such a closet honda lover, why you got a cossie and not a Civic Type-R?
You have obviously never driven an Integra and everyone can see this from your reply. Oh and i have owned one whats why i can comment, i have also been in plenty of RST over the years.
Oh im so sorry
Billy_RST

What you lited is just an opinion of what you prefer and not whats better ie looks better etc. The fact is in 1990 honda were getting 150bhp out of a 1.6 n/a engine that could do 300k miles easy and still be reliable, they had 2 piece drive shafts as standard, leather seats and a hell of a lot more modern interior that a series2 or a fiesta turbo.
eerrrrrrrr yeah. Honda that sounds like a bee or Escort with a T34 What would you rather
Put a t34 o a 1.6 vtec and then compare the 2. Have you ever owned a honda vtec?

What you lited is just an opinion of what you prefer and not whats better ie looks better etc. The fact is in 1990 honda were getting 150bhp out of a 1.6 n/a engine that could do 300k miles easy and still be reliable, they had 2 piece drive shafts as standard, leather seats and a hell of a lot more modern interior that a series2 or a fiesta turbo.
eerrrrrrrr yeah. Honda that sounds like a bee or Escort with a T34 What would you rather
Put a t34 o a 1.6 vtec and then compare the 2. Have you ever owned a honda vtec?
Originally Posted by Alps Pacino
Billy_RSTPut a t34 o a 1.6 vtec and then compare the 2. Have you ever owned a honda vtec?
You'd need to do do that to compare the two, the honda may have more power but still slow as fuck. They just sound like there moving. And no, i wouldn't waste money on a V-Tec. JAP CRAP
P.S Your avatar proves your an idiot
Oh and just realised your un funny picture dosent make sense.
The horse aint wearing blinkers. (Which i think your trying to get at)
Its wear eye protectiors to stop it getting a lance in the eye during jousting.
Idiot
The horse aint wearing blinkers. (Which i think your trying to get at)
Its wear eye protectiors to stop it getting a lance in the eye during jousting.
Idiot
Billy_RST
Do you genuinly believe a standard rst is quicker than a standard crx i-vt?
I would hardly saying tuning a vtec honda a waste of money especially in comparison to tuning an rst. It sounds like you obviously havent had anything to do with any tuned hondas at all cause if you did you would realise that for 10k you could have a 11's 500bhp crx.
Do you genuinly believe a standard rst is quicker than a standard crx i-vt?
I would hardly saying tuning a vtec honda a waste of money especially in comparison to tuning an rst. It sounds like you obviously havent had anything to do with any tuned hondas at all cause if you did you would realise that for 10k you could have a 11's 500bhp crx.
Billy_RST
There blinkers bell end look closely there fully covered at the sides and just mesh at the fronts. Horse's eyes are on the sides of there heads and not on the front like ours you know?
There blinkers bell end look closely there fully covered at the sides and just mesh at the fronts. Horse's eyes are on the sides of there heads and not on the front like ours you know?



