400bhp is not that much to ask, whats stopping it.
2.5" exhaust ? surely that will do ?
252deg duration cams?
GT2540R .86 hotside full boost 4k.
7.9:1 C/r
no AFR problems
no det problems.
mechanically sound engine
mapped

.
252deg duration cams?
GT2540R .86 hotside full boost 4k.
7.9:1 C/r
no AFR problems
no det problems.
mechanically sound engine
mapped

.
400bhp @ 1.2 bar?
I would have said that's a little too much to expect!
Also, I wouldn't have said that the torque diving like that is anything out of the ordinary.
Does the dyno its on give a boost plot?
I would have said that's a little too much to expect!
Also, I wouldn't have said that the torque diving like that is anything out of the ordinary.
Does the dyno its on give a boost plot?
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
400bhp @ 1.2 bar?
I would have said that's a little too much to expect!
Also, I wouldn't have said that the torque diving like that is anything out of the ordinary.
Does the dyno its on give a boost plot?
I would have said that's a little too much to expect!
Also, I wouldn't have said that the torque diving like that is anything out of the ordinary.
Does the dyno its on give a boost plot?
Your never gonna get 400bhp on that turbo at 1.2bar. On that turbo its a 2bar+ job really unless got mega lairly cams etc and a lot of luck.
2.5in exhaust isnt brilliant.
Rest of spec seems ok.
Cam timing?
2.5in exhaust isnt brilliant.
Rest of spec seems ok.
Cam timing?
Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
1.2bar held. no fluctuation. mapper is not the prob.
all parameters where optimal , act,egt,timing,afr etc etc
Originally Posted by Stavros
Your never gonna get 400bhp on that turbo at 1.2bar. On that turbo its a 2bar+ job really unless got mega lairly cams etc and a lot of luck.
2.5in exhaust isnt brilliant.
Rest of spec seems ok.
Cam timing?
2.5in exhaust isnt brilliant.
Rest of spec seems ok.
Cam timing?
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
1.2bar held. no fluctuation. mapper is not the prob.
all parameters where optimal , act,egt,timing,afr etc etc
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I think the exhaust needs looking at as well! Measure the back pressure, I bet it's the same as the boost pressure
.
.20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by Porkie
Head not up to the job of flowing enough air then?
Or are you SURE the cams are correct and timed right? Its not unheard of to get wrongly ground cams even brand new.
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I think the exhaust needs looking at as well! Measure the back pressure, I bet it's the same as the boost pressure
.
.Its not an ideal situation, but be suprised if a 2.5in is holding him back THAT much.
How far away from 400bhp are you now? Still at 336bhp yeah?
Ok, maybe it is the exhaust, didnt realise youd got that high already.
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by Porkie
Head not up to the job of flowing enough air then?
Originally Posted by Stavros
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I think the exhaust needs looking at as well! Measure the back pressure, I bet it's the same as the boost pressure
.
.Its not an ideal situation, but be suprised if a 2.5in is holding him back THAT much.
How far away from 400bhp are you now?
As i mentioned on vauxsport mate, it would be good to see the fuelling and timing maps.
IF its failing to flow the air anymore, it should be very obvious from a big drop in injector duty per cycle.
It certainly seems like a flow issue though of some sort, have you tried measuring the boost pressure just after the turbo and at the manifold and seeing what sort of drop you get through your IC and pipework etc?
IF its failing to flow the air anymore, it should be very obvious from a big drop in injector duty per cycle.
It certainly seems like a flow issue though of some sort, have you tried measuring the boost pressure just after the turbo and at the manifold and seeing what sort of drop you get through your IC and pipework etc?
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
might run it with the exhaust off at the cat replacement?
be noisy but atleast i can rule that out for undoing 3 bolts and a quick power run?
be noisy but atleast i can rule that out for undoing 3 bolts and a quick power run?
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
If lots of extra boost pressure fails to yield any extra power then you have most probably either:
1) Reached the TIP max.
The head cant flow anymore volume due to turbine housing/manifold.
2) Hit a huge flow restriction in teh exhaust.
The turbine cant flow any more volume due to backpressure in exhaust.
P.S: Both the above will normally show unusually high EGT's.
3) Hit a flow restriction in the inlet/head
Not easy to measure in absolute terms on a speed density system. Try measuring TIP and turn teh boost up to see if it raises.
4) You have run off the compressor map and into excessive compressor heating.
Have you measured the Air temps at the inlet when Mapping?
4) Camshaft misstiming is causing a massive drop in VE.
What are teh cams dialled in at? Is it laggier than expected?
One of the above will very likely be your problem.
1) Reached the TIP max.
The head cant flow anymore volume due to turbine housing/manifold.
2) Hit a huge flow restriction in teh exhaust.
The turbine cant flow any more volume due to backpressure in exhaust.
P.S: Both the above will normally show unusually high EGT's.
3) Hit a flow restriction in the inlet/head
Not easy to measure in absolute terms on a speed density system. Try measuring TIP and turn teh boost up to see if it raises.
4) You have run off the compressor map and into excessive compressor heating.
Have you measured the Air temps at the inlet when Mapping?
4) Camshaft misstiming is causing a massive drop in VE.
What are teh cams dialled in at? Is it laggier than expected?
One of the above will very likely be your problem.
Also, the turbo, it could be mismatched spec. This is quite common.
For example, we have just changed the exhaust housing on a turbo we were running on something to the next size down and made 30bhp more!
There is alot to turbo-spec'ing and mistakes are often made.
For example, we have just changed the exhaust housing on a turbo we were running on something to the next size down and made 30bhp more!
There is alot to turbo-spec'ing and mistakes are often made.
Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
Also, the turbo, it could be mismatched spec. This is quite common.
For example, we have just changed the exhaust housing on a turbo we were running on something to the next size down and made 30bhp more!
There is alot to turbo-spec'ing and mistakes are often made.
For example, we have just changed the exhaust housing on a turbo we were running on something to the next size down and made 30bhp more!
There is alot to turbo-spec'ing and mistakes are often made.
just i'm the guinea pig
Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
Also, the turbo, it could be mismatched spec. This is quite common.
For example, we have just changed the exhaust housing on a turbo we were running on something to the next size down and made 30bhp more!
There is alot to turbo-spec'ing and mistakes are often made.
For example, we have just changed the exhaust housing on a turbo we were running on something to the next size down and made 30bhp more!
There is alot to turbo-spec'ing and mistakes are often made.
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Lee, the inlet manifold is anothe suspect.
Have you given any thought to replacing it?
Have you given any thought to replacing it?
now i'm sure i'm correct by thinking that for more volume past a fixed size hole more pressure is required. hence turbo's. i realise i can run less boost but the same volume of air if the flow hole/tract in increased by size/flow characteristics. but hasn't this manifold already flowed enough volume at under 2 bar to give 400bhp over in sweden etc ?





