Ford Escort RS Turbo This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Escort Rs Turbo Series 1 and 2.

Final drive ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 02:09 PM
  #1  
JimmyBoy's Avatar
JimmyBoy
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall
Default Final drive ratio

Bit of a hypothetical question, but say if your RST was to have around 320bhp and was to have a new gearbox bulit by CTS, then would you keep the original final drive ratio, or change it?

I personally think it would be wise to change it to a slightly lower ratio, because...

a) You'll have loads of torque, so it may (slightly) eliminate some of the wheelspin in 1st/2nd and probablly 3rd gear.
b) You would be able to obtain higher top end speed

I havent got all the details at hand of the standard final drive ratio and the available final drive ratio's from cts when building the box, but would just be interested in peoples opinions.

I presume christian has a different final drive to achive his 168mph top speed run as I think the standard box is limited to about 153, but im not sure what his final drive ratio would be.

Opinions ?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #2  
Badman38's Avatar
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 6
From: the land of oz slough
Default

i would 3.82 final drive not to my personal liking, i will be speaking to bernie about dropping to either 3.5 or 3.3 but it does all depend where peak power is, on most zvh for Instants going lower would help because peak power Achieved @ a low rpm but they have the torque to pull the gears.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #3  
Christian and Beccy's Avatar
Christian and Beccy
#1 in Spelling Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,329
Likes: 6
From: Norfolk
Default

I do have carefully considered ratio's. There are 2 sides to the coin.

Shorter ratio's will obviously make the car accelerate faster, but the power delivery could potentially smash the gearbox.

Alternatively, longer ratio's will make the car accelerate slower and in some ways be kinder to the gearbox. Although, the strain on the gearbox will be greater, so could just as easily strip gears.

If you go taller and get it wrong, the car will feel laggy and awful.

Also, don't expect to put a tall ratio in and just go and do 170mph.

I remember having Series 1 ratio's in mine and it was an absolute flying machine. But topped out before it went off the speedo. Now it goes off the speedo in 4th!!
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #4  
JimmyBoy's Avatar
JimmyBoy
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall
Default

I as just thinking that with that kind of power, it would be wise to choose a slightly taller final drive, but was just unsure of how you would go about deciding on an actual ratio so you get the most out of the potential of the power output.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #5  
orion_rst's Avatar
orion_rst
Time to play The Game HHH
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Malta
Default

What final drive ratio would you recommend for quarter-mile racing then? Bernie suggested to me either 4:1 or 4:26:1
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 06:38 AM
  #6  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

What's the 3.3 ratio drive like on a zvh running 300 bhp or would you stick to standard final drive
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 07:00 AM
  #7  
Karlos G's Avatar
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,185
Likes: 25
From: Suffolk
Default

IME Anything taller than the stock 3.82 feels horrible, I ran a 3.58 (IIRC) with 17" wheels and could do from 20mph to almost 120mph in 3rd, was like driving an auto!! I did have a theoretical top speed of 188mph though! lol
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 19, 2012 | 07:19 AM
  #8  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

So would it be a better alrounder to stick with standard
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 07:20 AM
  #9  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by escortrss1300bhp
What's the 3.3 ratio drive like on a zvh running 300 bhp or would you stick to standard final drive
u will need more power than that to pull a 3.3 final drive , stick to the 3.8 or if u want to gear it up put in a 3.5 , mine works really well with long gears
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 07:47 AM
  #10  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

What car would u get tha 3.5 from
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 07:49 AM
  #11  
Rogeyboy's Avatar
Rogeyboy
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 5
From: Essex
Default

Personally i prefer a longer ratio box and i think once rolling they are actually quicker up to a point, ie the series 2s 3.82 vs the series 1 4.?? In a series 1 or xr3i you are always changing gear and its revving its tits off at 70/80mph whereas the Series 2 is relaxed at cruise and you dont need to keep changing.
Eg - an Xr3i or series 1 won't do a genuine 60mph in 2nd (standard rev limit applied)
whereas a series2 turbo or orion 1.6i will, as they have taller final drives.

In gear the shorter box maybe quicker but from say 50-100 there will be an extra gearchange so it ruins the advantage?

Karlos - was the 3.58 from a diesel?

Im tempted to try a longer final drive (maybe the 3.58) for an even more relaxed cruise (circa 2500rpm @ 70mph) and so i can use 2nd on roundabouts etc, as i currently use 3rd and its just at the point of spool up so 1/2 way round i hit boost and it upsets the car.

IMO with 300bhp i'd go for the taller gears as the torque and power will pull thru nicely, and the shorter ratios will just be wheelspinning and hitting limiter etc.

Last edited by Rogeyboy; Apr 19, 2012 at 07:50 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 08:00 AM
  #12  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

Sweet were can I get tha 3.58 from
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 10:59 AM
  #13  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by Rogeyboy
Personally i prefer a longer ratio box and i think once rolling they are actually quicker up to a point, ie the series 2s 3.82 vs the series 1 4.?? In a series 1 or xr3i you are always changing gear and its revving its tits off at 70/80mph whereas the Series 2 is relaxed at cruise and you dont need to keep changing.
Eg - an Xr3i or series 1 won't do a genuine 60mph in 2nd (standard rev limit applied)
whereas a series2 turbo or orion 1.6i will, as they have taller final drives.

In gear the shorter box maybe quicker but from say 50-100 there will be an extra gearchange so it ruins the advantage?

Karlos - was the 3.58 from a diesel?

Im tempted to try a longer final drive (maybe the 3.58) for an even more relaxed cruise (circa 2500rpm @ 70mph) and so i can use 2nd on roundabouts etc, as i currently use 3rd and its just at the point of spool up so 1/2 way round i hit boost and it upsets the car.

IMO with 300bhp i'd go for the taller gears as the torque and power will pull thru nicely, and the shorter ratios will just be wheelspinning and hitting limiter etc.
true u are using all the power and torque instead of just spinnig up , i had a 3.5 bc and now im on a 3.4 in the mtx , think 3.5 is xr2 , tells in the haynes manualthe finial drives
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 06:41 PM
  #14  
Karlos G's Avatar
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,185
Likes: 25
From: Suffolk
Default

Yeah as Stu says it's from an XR2 (not XR2i), I personally hated it but each to their own, I think the original S2 RST ratio's are spot on.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 06:53 AM
  #15  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

I had a 3.3 in my last one an was mental
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 07:10 AM
  #16  
Rogeyboy's Avatar
Rogeyboy
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 5
From: Essex
Default

Define "Mental"
I didnt realise an XR2 had such a long final drive...
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 07:23 AM
  #17  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

Do not no y it went like that the chap at gear box said it was a 3.3 but was fast
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 07:27 AM
  #18  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

I just want tha 3.3 again I think but Dow no what car the 3.3 gearbox it came out of
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 08:04 AM
  #19  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

mk2 fiesta/ mk3 escort diesel i think and they mite be a different 6 bolt pattern on the diff aswel, cant remb

looked in to it a few years ago for mine but went for the 3.5 as gearing to 190+ on 16s @7.5k is more than enough

jamsport may still have the bits u need

Last edited by stuart collins; Apr 20, 2012 at 08:06 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 08:07 AM
  #20  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

Cheers I thought it was
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 08:13 AM
  #21  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

Would it work better with the 3.3 with s1 gears on or s2
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 08:19 AM
  #22  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

mine was a s1 box with 3.5 in it
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 08:28 AM
  #23  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

I have both sets of gears s1 an s2 just got to find out if they are the same or dif an if there dif would like to no what wil work better on 3.3 final drive
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 08:54 AM
  #24  
Rob_DOHC's Avatar
Rob_DOHC
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,790
Likes: 43
From: London
Default

I like the standard RST gearing, Im not sure what i have at the moment but its an IB5 from a 1.8 non turbo diesel van very close ratio's and its bloody annoying. Constantly changing gear, cant do 60 in 2nd (unless i raise the rev limit to nearly 7k)... A taller box will also load the engine up more and help spool up time in lower gears, I don't get max boost until 3rd gear as the load just isn't there, but that is 25psi in 3rd lol

Rob,
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 10:33 AM
  #25  
Rogeyboy's Avatar
Rogeyboy
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 5
From: Essex
Default

Rob u love abit of boost don't u... Im on a lowly 12-13psi , Car moves well as it is tho! I guess the stage 3 turbo helps!

I'd love to find an IB5 with the same (or at least similar) ratios to stock orion/rst. Or even with a little taller final drive!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 12:40 PM
  #26  
Rob_DOHC's Avatar
Rob_DOHC
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,790
Likes: 43
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by Rogeyboy
Rob u love abit of boost don't u... Im on a lowly 12-13psi , Car moves well as it is tho! I guess the stage 3 turbo helps!

I'd love to find an IB5 with the same (or at least similar) ratios to stock orion/rst. Or even with a little taller final drive!
tbh thats on a stage 2 t3... with a gt28 or stage 3 T3 my boost will be much lower, more like 20 probably.... That should be good for high 200's tho

The IB5 feels like a very positive improvement over all, and it didn't break when the car was on the road! But if I keep the escort I think an MTX75 swap is on the cards.

Rob,
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 03:06 PM
  #27  
Karlos G's Avatar
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,185
Likes: 25
From: Suffolk
Default

Originally Posted by Rogeyboy
Rob u love abit of boost don't u... Im on a lowly 12-13psi , Car moves well as it is tho! I guess the stage 3 turbo helps!

I'd love to find an IB5 with the same (or at least similar) ratios to stock orion/rst. Or even with a little taller final drive!
S2 RS Turbo
1st 3.15
2nd 1.91
3rd 1.28
4th 0.95
5th 0.76
FD 3.82

1.8 Escorts Inc Estate
3.15
1.93
1.28
0.95
0.76
FD 3.82

1.3 Ka PAS (What I run)
3.15
1.93
1.28
0.95
0.76
FD 4.06

Non PAS has a FD of 3.59 making each gear a bit longer.

Last edited by Karlos G; Apr 20, 2012 at 03:09 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 06:56 PM
  #28  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

Cheers
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 03:36 PM
  #29  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

so what everyones advise on a 3.3 final drive? on a 2.1 zvh stage 3 engine with cossi management pushing 300ish bhp
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 04:26 PM
  #30  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

put a 3.5 in it
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 06:35 PM
  #31  
Karl's Avatar
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 3
From: Derbyshire
Default

It's quite simple choosing what final drive you require.

Choose your realistic maximum top speed, wheel size and maximum engine rpm. From that work out your final drive required and choose the one thats nearest.

Our ERST top speed record with Oli's car was done on std gearing with 7600rpm limit for 174mph. Obviously if the engine did'nt rev as high we would have to have used a longer final drive.

Just do the maths and work it out, don't guess!
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 07:25 PM
  #32  
escortrss1300bhp's Avatar
escortrss1300bhp
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: west midz
Default

ok cheers just thought it mite get laggy with 3.3
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 10:51 PM
  #33  
Rob_DOHC's Avatar
Rob_DOHC
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,790
Likes: 43
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by Karl
It's quite simple choosing what final drive you require.

Choose your realistic maximum top speed, wheel size and maximum engine rpm. From that work out your final drive required and choose the one thats nearest.

Our ERST top speed record with Oli's car was done on std gearing with 7600rpm limit for 174mph. Obviously if the engine did'nt rev as high we would have to have used a longer final drive.

Just do the maths and work it out, don't guess!
Karl you seem to be making a passion ford come back recently, was having a good chat with your brother a while ago about his sunbeam, by chat I mean drool.

Im not so sure that choosing a final drive based around your maximum speed is the best way forward for a road car... probably a good starting point though. I would happily go for a car that cruised happily at 2500 rpm at around 60-70 if I was on the motorway a lot... clearly the car is never going to do 210mph though
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 07:27 AM
  #34  
Rogeyboy's Avatar
Rogeyboy
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 5
From: Essex
Default

Karlos - What shape escorts without pas, mk5 and 6 or just 5? Is that front starter aswell?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 01:54 PM
  #35  
Karlos G's Avatar
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,185
Likes: 25
From: Suffolk
Default

Originally Posted by Rogeyboy
Karlos - What shape escorts without pas, mk5 and 6 or just 5? Is that front starter aswell?
The PAS and NON PAS I was referring to are Ka box's mate (rear starter and hydraulic, but you can just take the gearset out if needed)....
Any MK5 Escort thats IB5 is front starter and cable IIRC.

Last edited by Karlos G; Apr 23, 2012 at 05:27 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 02:41 PM
  #36  
Rogeyboy's Avatar
Rogeyboy
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 5
From: Essex
Default

Sorry m8, missed that
Nice 1 cheers!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fiddy
Pictures, video & Photoshop Forum
21
Sep 29, 2015 06:10 PM
IainRS1700T
Cars for Sale
9
Sep 25, 2015 06:44 AM
Bransby
Ford Escort RS Turbo
2
Sep 21, 2015 05:29 PM
pabloXR
General Car Related Discussion.
9
Sep 21, 2015 12:42 PM
DAN@ADRIAN FLUX
General Car Related Discussion.
37
Sep 20, 2015 10:38 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 PM.