Originally Posted by wimwerf
you al remember martin's car.....it's 4wd. there wasn't a car which was faster to 60, 100 and top speed. it goes round corners like nothing on earth. you can't beat that with a 2wd.
If Martins car was converted to RWD with decent size rear tyre (10" rear wheels etc) then it would be faster round a track and faster top speed FACT.
0-60 & 100 I'll give ya because it's all over in the first 60ft.
All this bollox about 4wd being better handling makes me laugh!!
Why?? The have the same about of mechanical grip from the 4 tyres as a 4x4 car except they will arrive at the corner slower and understeer right round it
Ok, so they will drive out of the slower corners better but thats poor compensation in my eyes.
Originally Posted by Lee Reynolds
4X4 Tim imo. I dont see the point to all this bull shit ' arse end out action' people talk about...load of crap.....imo thats just an excuse to own a less inferior car because at the end of the day they A: either cant afford to buy a 4X4 or B:can buy one but cant afford to mod one.
ROFLMFAO............ What a cock
You drive a Sierra mate, as do I, superior my ass
I've driven pretty much every 4x4 performance car of the last 20 year inc saphs, intergrales, early Evos, GTiRs & Scoobs etc
Not one off them compare to a well set up RWD car in the dry IMO.
(and btw less inferior means better
)
Originally Posted by Lee Reynolds
IMO having 4 wheels coming out of corners and off roundabouts is fookin awesome....coming off a roundabout at 80 plus in third and it just fooking sticking there is more of a buzz than having to let off the throttle cos the arse end is coming out...WTF is that good for????
LOL........let off?? Pussy
Can you guess which option I voted for
