still makes no sense,
my policy wording (and in fact every policy i have had)
states what vehicle is to be covered and that cover is only valid with the following named drivers.
the new owner isnt a name driver thus no insurance.
Plus many policies specifically say owned by you or access to you (ie Registered keeper) clauses too.
So it still makes no sense whatsoever that the insurance company are forced to pay out on an invalid policy for a driver they dont cover and a vehicle thats not covered anymore by the fact its no longer owned.
or is it a case where no legal involvement has been made and the dumb insurers just rolled over and paid out before having checked the details?? And hence now want payback??