he wasn't on his phone though, he proved he wasn't, but plod took no notice and the courts dismissed the evidence from his phone company that he hadn't made a call within hours of the incident

i'm not sure who it was though but someone will have a better memory than me and point you to the thread in question

i'm sure there was quite some concerns raised by it as loads of peole then claimed that, as it had been agreed by a judge that joe public could report anyone for being ont he phone and be believed this had set a preccedent that oculd then be followed, in law