Old 03-01-2011, 12:13 AM
  #49  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Will Pedley
Just as a comparison - i looked into making a 10,000rpm revving Zetec and found a suitable crank that would give safe mean piston speeds. I calculated the displacement of the engine using this crank and even on an 86mm bore the largest I could get it was around 1.55 litre. Torque dropped around 20lb/ft everywhere and power was poor at low engine speeds.

Compared to the 2.2 stroker crank i designed that would safely rev to 8000rpm and give around 15lb/ft more torque through the rev range on a theoretically standard engine, there seemed little point in having to uprate the valvetrain and lubrication system to take those extra 2000rpm.
Agreed, in order to get a decent rod ratio for those sort of rpm you would need to do what martin has done and make the block taller, and that doesnt appear to have been done on the engine in question.