It wasn't that long ago that business leaders were telling us that they were getting people in with uni degrees who didn't actually have a fuckig clue, so by all rights only the smartest of the smart should be allowed to go to uni.

What I'd do is make sure that classes were segregated into levels again so that you had the smart kids in the smart class and learning more than te thick cunts who are only ever going to sign on and have kids and, these that show the best aptitude for learning then get pushed on to uni type status, if you only have 10% of your year being eligable to go to uni then you will only need that much time and the unis themselves can be more structued. Nonpoint in trying to cram in as many as possible when they aren't going to learn.

And yes I k ow those who can afford to pay their way will have it easy but you only get free school until you are 16 not fucking 35 like some cunts stay on for.

I do however also think that the brightest most talented pupils should be sponsered by the schools and, as a reslut of this they should be allowed to reclaim the cost of the uni fees back from the government depending on how well the student does at said uni, so getting a 2:2 would get you 50% of the money back but getting a full on best in breed would get all their money back bat least those who are smart get a leg up and those who are thcik get weeded out, no point I. Wasting an education on someone who doesn't want to learn is there, stick them in the army or some shit so they get a lesson I. Real life for their futures