Old Jun 4, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #27  
whybee's Avatar
whybee
prozac user
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: midlands
Default

Originally Posted by RobL
bollox,you dont know wtf youre talking about
football is far more physically demanding than rugby and footballers are also a hell of a lot fitter and are easily more at risk of injury
go do some knitting and let the men on here discuss the footy its obviously not your cup of tea

p*ssing myself laughing at this one! are you being serious or just fancy a bit of a laugh? "football more physical than rugby"???
have you ever played rugby? you do know which game we´re talking about don´t you? the funny shaped "football" looks like a football player has been using it to rest his feet on while he has his manicure! and roots touched up.
i grant you they musy run more than a rugby player but thats about it.
i dont think anyone made any comments saying football is easier or the training any easier, just purely game vs game. and in the context of which is more physically demanding. imagine haveing a "game" of football but with the opersition being allowed to hold your shirt everytime you try to run with the ball. imagine everytime you want to get past a defender they can crash into you and drag you down, now try that for a full match distance!

only someone who´s not tried both could make such an ill imformed and outlandish comment that its more work playing football, you did make a good fair few of us laugh though so cheers for that.

boots (check) shirt (check) hair band and earring tape (check)
Reply